Kelman v. Kramer ~ 2nd Request For Exparte Re: Court’s Intent To Mitigate Damage To Sharon Kramer For Unlawfully Incarcerating Her For Refusal To Commit Perjury…

Orally Ordered By Court Which Would Absolve Seven Years of Judicial, Clerk & Atttorney Misconduct and Unexplained $19,343.95 Lien On Her Name

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

UPDATED April 6, 2012                       

In a message dated 4/6/2012 10:18:46 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, SNK1955@aol.com writes:
Dear Ms. Duncan,
 
As promised, below is the link to the blog of what Judge Nugent has gotten the San Diego Sheriff Department involved in.  Anything you and Sheriff Gore could do to rectify the situation would be greatly appreciated. I am traumatized and fearful of what Judge Nugent will do next to conceal his, other judiciary and court clerk unlawful (actually criminal) misconduct.
 
Katy’s Exposure Blog Exposing Environmental Health Threats & Those  Responsible  Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3lO
Thank you in advance for your help,
Sharon Noonan Kramer 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  

Submitted To Court, April 5, 2012 4th NOTICE TO COURT RE: EXPARTE HEARING OVER COURT MISHANDLING OF CONTEMPT ORDER & DEMAND FOR REMOVAL OF FALSE MISDEMEANOR ON RECORD OF SHARON KRAMER
 
Minute Order of April 3rd 3rd COURT DENIAL TO GRANT AN EXPARTE HEARING
 
Submitted To Court, April 2, 2012 3rd REQUEST FOR EXPARTE, RE: COURT’S INTENT TO REMOVE MARCH 26, 2012 LIBELOUS SHERIFF DEPARTMENT CONTEMPT OF COURT RECORD & DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER
 
Minute Order of March 29th 2nd COURT DENIAL TO GRANT AN EXPARTE HEARING
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Submitted To Court, March 28, 2012 ~ 2Nd REQUEST FOR EXPARTE RE: COURT’S INTENT TO MITIGATE DAMAGE TO SHARON KRAMER FOR UNLAWFULLY INCARCERATING FOR HER REFUSAL TO COMMIT PERJURY, ORALLY ORDERED BY COURT ON MARCH 9, 2012 

Minute Order of March 26th  Ist COURT DENIAL TO GRANT AN EXPARTE HEARING

 

Submitted To Court, March 23, 2012  REQUEST FOR EXPARTE RE: COURT’S INTENT TO REMOVE FALSE CRIMINAL RECORD OF DEFENDANT SHARON KRAMER

EXHIBIT  1. ~How Civil Contempt of Court Morphed To False Criminal Contempt & A Fraudulent Misdemeanor On Mrs. Kramer’s Record 

EXHIBIT  2. ~ March 9, 2012 ~ Why Kramer Refused To Commit Perjury & Defraud Public While Aiding To Conceal Seven Years Of Judicial, Clerk & Attorney Misconduct By Signing The Fraudulent Retraction (huge pdf, see below for break down of the unlawful actions)

EXHIBIT  3. ~ March 9, 2012 ~ Courts Incarcerated Kramer Because She Refused To Sign The Fraudulent Retraction Which Would Have Absolved Judicial, Clerk & Attorney Misconduct. 

EXHIBIT  4. ~ March 9, 2012 ~ Sentencing Transcript – Court Knew It Was Unlawful To Send Kramer To Jail 

EXHIBIT  5. ~ January 19, 2012 ~ Revised Order & Judgment States Nothing Of Kramer Having To Sign Kelman’s Proposed (fraudulent) Retraction, Submitted To Court On February 10, 2012

EXHIBIT  6. ~February 5, 2012 ~ Declaration Of Kevin Carstens Stating Evidence Of Court Corruption Harming Public Will Not Be Removed From 2800 Member Support Group, Sickbuilidngs@YahooGroups.Com  

EXHIBIT  7. ~ February 6, 2012 ~ Declaration Of Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure, Stating Evidence Of Court Corruption Harming Public Will Not Be Removed From Katy’s Blog 

EXHIBIT  8. ~  March 1, 2012 ~ Transcript of ExParte Hearing Called By Court 

EXHIBIT  9. ~  December 7, 2011 to March 12, 2012 ~ HOW The Court & Sheriff’s Department Went From Civil Contempt To Criminal Contempt To A False Misdemeanor On Kramer’s Record 

EXHIBIT 10. ~  March 14, 2012 ~ After Kramer Had The False Misdemeanor On Her Record She Was No Longer Required To Sign The False Retraction For Which She Was Unlawfully Incarcerated.

EXHIBIT 11. ~ January 6 & January 21, 2012 ~ Contempt Of Court Transcript In Which They Were Going For A Mental Incompetency Of Mrs. Kramer Defense For Judicial Misconduct  & Mental Status Evaluation Of Mrs. Kramer Stating She Is Doing Well Considering The “Hostile Environment Of Being Aligned And Subject To Libel”

EXHIBIT 12. ~ February 23, 2012  ~ $19,343.95 Lien On Kramer’s Name, No Explanation Given By Court

EXHIBIT 13. ~ October 20, 2011 ~ Falsification of Court Case Management System “CCMS” Stating a Tentative Ruling Was Issued 

EXHIBIT 14. ~  October 20, 2011 ~ Evidence That No Tentative Ruling Was Issued – No Explanation Given Why The Court Would Not Nullify The Order Which Stopped Kramer From Being Able To Write Of What The Courts Are Doing That Is Defrauding The Public.

EXHIBIT 15. ~  September 11, 2011 ~ Excerpt of Letter To Clerk Of Appellate Court RE: His Falsification Of The Remittitur, December 20, 2011 & Falsified Alteration of CCMS September 9, 2009 in Kelman & GlobalTox v Kramer.  (This Letter from Kramer to the Clerk of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court was submitted as exhibit by Kelman on October 17, 2011 as to why Kramer should be held in Contempt of Court. It caused a call from the Clerk to Kramer on October 5, 2011 with a threat that Justice McConnell would deem Kramer to be a vexatious litigant, should she pursue legal action for the Clerk record falsification. What the Clerk Was Aiding To Conceal By This Falsification is MASSIVE FRAUD over the mold issue, implicating the involvment of the Federal Government by concealing that a retired Deputy Director of CDC/NIOSH – who is also a co-owner of Veritox & co-author of ACOEM’s & US Chamber’s Mold Position has been an undisclosed party to the litigation since the beginning in 2005.  This Government Code 6200 Violation by the Clerk is concealing that in both the 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion and the 2010 Appellate Opinion they suppressed the evidence of the CDC NIOSH link – Bryan Hardin – being an undisclosed party, Government Code 6200 violations are criminal and pushable by up to four years in prison)

EXHIBIT 16. ~January 11 & January 17, 2012 ~ Omission that Scheuer – not the Court – Wrote the Proposed Order & Judgment and Revised Order & Judgment.  (Kramer brought this and other omissions in the electronic case file to the Court’s attention, March 9, 2012.  While other omissions were corrected, these two were not.

Submitted to Court as Exhibit 2, on March 23, 2012:

APPENDIX OF WHY MRS. KRAMER COULD NOT SIGN MR. KELMAN’S PROPOSED “RETRACTION BY MRS. KRAMER” WITHOUT COMMITTING PERJURY, DEFRAUDING THE PUBLIC & AIDING TO CONCEAL JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT. She was incarcerated on March 12, 2012 for refusing to sign the below by oral order of the court on March 9, 2012.

NO RETRACTION by Sharon Kramer

INABILITY TO SIGN ”retraction by Sharon Kramer” without committing perjury & defrauding the public

APPELLATE COURT crafted opinions to make a writing appear to have made an accusation of perjury that it did not make

HOW THE SAN DIEGO COURTS FRAMED A US CITIZEN FOR LIBEL OVER A WRITING IMPACTING PUBLIC HEALTH & BILLIONS OF INSURANCE INDUSTRY DOLLARS – NOW HAVE INCARCERATED FOR REFUSAL OF SILENCE AND REFUSAL TO SIGN A FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY – WHICH WOULD HAVE ABSOLVED SEVEN YEARS OF JUDICIAL, CLERK & ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT.

2006 & 2010 APPELLATE OPINIONS omitted fourteen key lines from the middle of Mr. Kelman’s testimony in Oregon

ALL COURTS SUPPRESSED evidence of Mrs. Kramer’s unimpeached explanation for the phrase, “altered his  under oath statements”

MRS. KRAMER’S WRITING accurately states the think-tank money was for theUSChamber Mold Statement 

THE 2006 Anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion falsely made it appear Mrs. Kramer accused Mr. Kelman of lying about being paid for the ACOEM Mold Statement

THE 2010 OPINION concealed what judicial peers had done in 2006 to frame Mrs. Kramer for libel

MR. KELMAN’S ATTORNEY’S role in making it falsely appear Mrs. Kramer accused Mr. Kelman of lying about being paid to author the ACOEM Mold Statement

THIS COURT IS AWARE that Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer want Mrs. Kramer gagged from being able to write of how prior courts and Mr. Scheuer framed her for libel over the words, “altered his under oath statements”

MR. KELMAN DID commit perjury – in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer to establish false theme for malice

THIS COURT KNOWS Mr. Kelman’s testimony as an expert defense witness in mold litigation is not based on accepted science 

PRIOR TO ISSUING the temporary injunctive relief order, this Court was provided evidence of the continued adverse impact on the public if Mrs. Kramer was stopped from writing of what prior courts had done

MRS. KRAMER is unable to sign proposed retraction without committing perjury, defrauding the public, concealing judicial misconduct & aiding to defile the Constitution

RETRACTION by Justice Judith McConnell, Chair of th California Commission on Judicial Performance

DECLARATION of Sharon Noonan Kramer

Return To HOME PAGE

Advertisements

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s