On March 12th, 2012, the Honorable Thomas Nugent incarcerated Sharon Kramer at the Los Colinas Womens Detention Center in Santee, California for refusing to commit perjury on March 9, 2012 when ORDERED to do so by the Court or spend five days in jail. Her signature on the fraudulent retraction Judge Nugent was trying to coerce Mrs. Kramer to sign for something she did not do, would have absolved seven years of judicial -including Judge Nugent, clerk, attorney and plaintiff misconduct that has aided to defraud the public of billions of dollars over the mold issue. They collectively framed Mrs. Kramer for libel with actual malice over the first public writing of how it became a fraud in public health policy that it was scientifically proven moldly buildings do not harm, then tried to silence her of writing of what they had done and its continued adverse impact on the public.
While unlawfully incarcerated by Judge Nugent, Mrs. Kramer was physicially violated by strip search; bused from the jail while chained to a drug addict & forced to appear before Judge Nugent in shackles, chains & jail garb. Never charged with a crime, she was given a false criminal record – misdemeanor – for alleged civil contempt of court for refusing to commit perjury as ordered to do by Judge Nugent.
On April 3, 2012, the Court informed Mrs. Kramer by MINUTE ORDER if she wanted the false criminal record Judge Nugent had given her removed, she would have to do it by motion. The earliest a motion could be heard is August of 2012.
On April 5, 2012 Mrs. Kramer made a DEMAND of Judge Nugent that he remove her false criminal record. Obviously, Mrs. Kramer is not the criminal in this twisted rendition of jusitce for daring to speak the truth in America against the interests of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce.
This 4th NOTICE TO COURT regarding its actions over alleged Contempt of Court is a matter of public record. It may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me Short Link: http://wp.me/p20mAH-cUSome pdf links are large and may take several seconds to open.
NECESSITY FOR EXPARTE HEARING
Defendant Sharon “Kramer” has submitted three requests between March 23rd and April 2nd that the Court grant an Exparte hearing regarding how it will be mitigating its damages to her for unlawful incarceration for refusing to sign a fraudulent document under penalty of perjury – and then placing a Civil Contempt of Court on her Sheriff Department and Department of Justice records as of March 26th.- while removing the false Criminal Contempt that was placed on her record on March 12, 2012. The three prior requests be read online at: http://wp.me/p20mAH-cU
As of April 4, 2012; Kramer became aware that she still has a false misdemeanor, criminal record, and that the Court has known this since no later than March 28, 2012. The Court was informed of the misdemeanor remaining on Kramer’s record, even after the criminal contempt was removed, by an email sent to the Court from Ms. Debbie Duncan, Operations Supervisor of the San Diego Sheriff Department.
The Court is aware this false misdemeanor could preclude Kramer from being able to obtain a California real estate license. Kramer was never even charged with a crime, let alone found guilty of one, a misdemeanor. The Court seems motivated to have Kramer have a false misdemeanor on her record with the intent of then deeming her mentally incompetent and need of court appointed counsel.
IT APPEARS IT WAS THE COURT’S INTENT TO FALSELY GIVE KRAMER A CRIMINAL RECORD, MISDEMEANOR TO TRY TO DEEM HER MENTALLY INCOMPETENT IN NEED OF COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL, TRACEY “SANG”
March 9, 2012, Kramer noticed the court of the express termination of Sang as her court appointed legal advisor. Read online at http://freepdfhosting.com/52f989deef.pdf is Kramer’s express termination of Sang as a legal advisor onMarch 9, 2012. Twice before Kramer had asked that Sang be removed from the case and that the Court and Sang stop misrepresenting she was Kramer’s Counsel.
January 12, 2012and January 18, 2012, after viewing the Proposed Order of January 10th and Revised Proposed Order of January 17th, both prepared by Scheuer, Kramer submitted objections to the Court trying to force Sang on her. Kramer’s Motions regarding misrepresentations in the Order and Revised Order regarding Sang may be read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/f00eb3eb5e.pdf (January 12) and http://freepdfhosting.com/7c6e1fc461.pdf (January 18)
January 6, 2012 The reason Kramer expressly terminated Sang stems from the Contempt of Court hearing. Sang, who is not a party to the litigation and is retained as no one’s legal counsel testified at the hearing without being sworn in as a witness. She gave testimony adverse to Kramer’s best interest. Sang was in favor of the Court attempting to deem Kramer mentally incompetent with the acknowledgment that she must first be charged with a misdeamenor before the Court could order such.
Sang stated in the trial that she, too, has reservations of Kramer’s mental state and had discussed this with Scheuer before the contempt hearing. At no time had Sang ever mentioned mental issues to Kramer and in fact, had commended her stating in an email, “You do good work”. (Read online at http://freepdfhosting.com/4a4b7b80ed.pdf is the transcript of the Civil Contempt of Court hearing, January 6, 2012). In relevant part it states:
COURT:… I HAVE SEEN AND HEARD FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, IF THIS WERE A TRUE CRIMINAL CASE, PEOPLE VERSUS, I WOULD BE ORDERING HER DOWN TO THE PSYCHIATRIC UNIT FOR AN EXAMINATION, NOT THAT SHE NEEDS INSTITUTIONALIZATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT IF SHE’S NOT COMPETENT TO GO FORWARD IN THESE PROCEEDINGS, SHE HAS A RIGHT TO SAY THAT AND HAVE SOMEONE SAY IT FOR HER…..
MS. SANG: I, TOO, HAVE GIVEN THOUGHT TO THIS VERY ISSUE, YOUR HONOR. AND COUNSEL AND I WERE DISCUSSING IT BEFORE THIS HEARING. WHAT I AM — AS A CRIMINAL ATTORNEY, THE MECHANISMS THAT I USUALLY USE IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS IS A 1368.
THE COURT: 1368. I KNOW IT WELL.
MS. SANG: IT’S REALLY THE ONLY THING THAT I BELIEVE WE HAVE AT OUR DISPOSAL.
THE COURT: SHE’S GOT TO BE CHARGED WITH A MISDEMEANOR. I JUST READ THE SECTION. BUT I’M NOT SO SURE THAT WE COULDN’T AT LEAST ATTEMPT TO GET HER EXAMINED. I’VE GOT THE PAPERS. YOU KNOW, IF WE COULD DOCTOR UP AN ORDER AND IF SHE WOULD GO….,
Kramer appeared by affidavit on her own behalf for the Contempt hearing as is her legal right to do. After reading the transcript of the Contempt hearing, Kramer was forced to spend $600.00 to quickly have a mental status exam on January 12, 2012 with Dr. Lorna Swartz to thwart off the “Nice Lady, But Criminally Crazy” defense of the court, Sang, Scheuer and Kelman for colluding to defraud the public and concealing seven years worth of judicial, clerk, attorney and plaintiff misconduct.
January 21, 2012 the examination results, which were submitted to the court on February 10, 2012, find Kramer quite competent and doing well considering she has been “aligned and subject to libel” for now seven years at the hands of the court. The January 21, 2012 mental status evaluation of Kramer may be read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/299bc42586.pdf
January 6, 2012, Read online at http://freepdfhosting.com/5681a3dffc.pdf is Kramer’s appearance at the Contempt of Court hearing by affidavit. In relevant part it reads:
1. I am not physically appearing before any judge with unbridled Contempt of Court and incarceration power, who is i.) suppressing the uncontroverted evidence in his case file that all prior courts suppressed the evidence the plaintiff committed perjury in a prior case to establish needed reason for malice, ii.) is suppressing the evidence that the plaintiff’s attorney repeatedly suborned the perjury, and iii.) is suppressing the evidence that the prior courts in the prior case, KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, framed me for libel over a writing impacting public health and safety.
This court’s Temporary Injunctive Relief Order (TIRO), is precluding me from writing and evidencing the corruption of prior courts by stopping me from writing the exact words for which I was framed for libel in the prior case, “altered his under oath statements”.
2. The direct evidence in this court’s case file is that the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court framed me for libel in their 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion to make my writing appear false. Then in their 2010 Appellate Opinion suppressed the evidence of what they had done in 2006. In their unpublished anti-SLAPP Opinion of November 2006, made it appear that I had accused Kelman of getting caught on the witness stand lying about being paid by the Manhattan Institute think-tank to make edits to a position statement for a medical trade association, theAmericanCollegeof Occupational and Environmental Medicine, ACOEM:
Ms. Debbie Duncan of the Sheriff Department sent an email to the Court on March 28, 2012, asking the Court of its intent to remove the false misdemeanor from Kramer’s record. As of April 4, 2012, no action had been taken by the Court to remove. Please notify the Sheriff Department to remove the false misdemeanor from Kramer’s record and direct them to notify the Justice Department to do the same. Please send Kramer a copy of Court directing the removal of her false criminal record, misdemeanor.
April 5, 2012 _______________________________________
Sharon Kramer, Pro Per
DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER
This is not just going to go away. First the courts FRAMED ME for libel with actual malice over the first PUBLIC WRITING of how it became a fraud in US public health policy that moldy buildings do not harm – as they suppressed the evidence that the plaintiff COMMITTED PERJURY to establish needed reason for malice. They FALSIFIED many court documents.
Then in a second case GAGGED ME from being able to write of what PRIOR COURTS had done by gagging me from writing the words for which I was framed by prior courts, “altered his under oath statements”. They found me in CONTEMPT OF COURT for SEEKING HELP to stop the continued HARRASSMENT and letting it be PUBLICLY KNOWN what was occurring.
Then the Court unlawfully INCARCERATED ME and gave me a FALSE CRIMINAL RECORD when WEBSITE OWNERS REFUSED to take the evidence of the colluding to defraud off of the Internet in the public’s best interest.
Then, when removing the false criminal record, gave me a false civil contempt record to conceal that the Court had unlawfully incarcerated me for refusing to sign a FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT, under penalty of perjury, which would have absolved all the misconduct and aid to further defraud the public –as the Court left the false misdemeanor on my record.
False documents were written by the Clerk of the Court on MARCH 26th and hand delivered to the Sheriff Department further attempting to conceal my unlawful imprisonment on the part of the Courts – while giving me a false record of purportedly violating a lawful Contempt of Court Order under CCP1218(a).
[sic, I am precluded from filing a Writ. It would go to Justice Judith McConnell, Presiding Justice of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court. I have been informed by her clerk, Stephen Kelly, in a TELEPHONE CALL he made to me on October 5, 2011, that Justice McConnell would just deem me to be a vexatious litigant should I pursue legal action for his criminal GOVERNMENT CODE 6200 Violations, of falsifying Appellate Court documents. Judge Nugent’s unlawful actions, SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE, imprisonment for refusing to commit perjury, attempt to have me deemed mentally incompetent with the aid of court appointed legal advisor and false criminal record are aiding to conceal. All of this is supposedly because I used the words, “altered his under oath statements” seven years ago — as I dared to ACCURATELY DESCRIBE Bruce Kelman trying to conceal how ACOEM, the US Chamber of Commerce the Manhattan Institute think-tank, a disreputable US Congressman from California, and his company, Veritox, were connected in defrauding the public over the mold issue for the purpose of MISLEADING US COURTS. In seven years time, no one can even state what I supposedly falsely accused Mr. Kelman of committing perjury of by the use of those five words – which are the only ones for which I have ever been sued. The Courts framed me to make it appear I falsely accused him of lying about being paid to author ACOEM’s Mold Statement. My writing accurately states he was paid by a think-tank to author the US Chamber’s Mold Statement. Thousands of lives have been unnecessarily devastated by the Courts involved practicing politics – not law – to point that they would incarcerated a US citizen for refusing to commit perjury that would absolve their misdeeds.]
I declare under penalty of perjury in the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and executed by me this day, April 5, 2012 in Escondido, California.
Sharon Kramer, Pro Per
THREE PRIOR REQUESTS to Judge Nugent to mitigate his damage for unlawfully incarcerating Kramer for her refusal to commit perjury, traumatizing her and giving her a false criminal record – without even being charged with a crime.
UPDATED April 6, 2012
Dear Ms. Duncan,As promised, below is the link to the blog of what Judge Nugent has gotten the San Diego Sheriff Department involved in. Anything you and Sheriff Gore could do to rectify the situation would be greatly appreciated. I am traumatized and fearful of what Judge Nugent will do next to conceal his, other judiciary and court clerk unlawful (actually criminal) misconduct.Katy’s Exposure Blog Exposing Environmental Health Threats & Those Responsible Short link: http://wp.me/plYPz-3lOThank you in advance for your help,Sharon Noonan Kramer
Submitted To Court, March 28, 2012 ~ 2Nd REQUEST FOR EXPARTE RE: COURT’S INTENT TO MITIGATE DAMAGE TO SHARON KRAMER FOR UNLAWFULLY INCARCERATING FOR HER REFUSAL TO COMMIT PERJURY, ORALLY ORDERED BY COURT ON MARCH 9, 2012
Submitted To Court, March 23, 2012 REQUEST FOR EXPARTE RE: COURT’S INTENT TO REMOVE FALSE CRIMINAL RECORD OF DEFENDANT SHARON KRAMER
Return to HOME PAGE