There is no Califorina Code of Civil Procedure 1218(a) that obligates a US citizen to commit the crime of perjury upon order of the Court or face incarceration. On April 5, 2012, Judge Thomas Nugent FALSIFIED Sharon Kramer’s Sheriff Department record to make it appear she had violated a Contempt of Court Order and Judgment of January 19, 2012. This was to conceal that he unlawfully incarcerated her for refusing to sign a fraudulent document he ORDERED her to sign on March 9, 2012, under penalty of perjury – or go to jail; and to conceal that while Mrs. Kramer was unlawfully incarcerated for refusing to commit perjury, her civil contempt morphed into criminal contempt and a FALSE MISDEMEANOR was placed on her record.
The FRAUDULENT DOCUMENT that Mrs. Kramer refused to sign and for which she was unlawfully incarcerated was submitted to the Court on February 10, 2012 by Mr. Kelman’s attorney, It contained the sentence, “I do not believe that Dr. Kelman committed perjury”.
The inference was that Mrs. Kramer would be signing a document stating that she did not believe Bruce Kelman committed perjury when testifying as a witness in Oregon on February 18, 2005 and that she had falsely accused him of such in a writing of March 2005. She never accused him of such in the writing. The courts took her accurate writing (the first to expose how it became a fruad in policy that moldy buildings do not harm) and made it appear libelously false that she had accused Mr. Kelman of such, with the aid of Mr. Kelman’s attorney, Mr. Scheuer.
Had she signed the false document she was ordered to sign by Judge Nugent on March 9th, 2012; what she would have been signing off on, is that Bruce Kelman did indeed commit perjury to establish needed reason for Mrs. Kramer’s purported malice while strategically litigating against her to silence her of the fraud in his science and how it became public health policy for misleading the US courts to deny stakeholders’ responsibility for causation of environmental illness. She would have been signing off that All courts to oversee the litigation of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer suppressed the evidence that the author of mold issue policy for the US Chamber and ACOEM, Mr. Kelman, committed criminal perjury to shut up the first person, Mrs. Kramer, who exposed the fraud of the science behind those two papers and how they were connected to mass market the deceit.
HERE is the video of Bruce Kelman committing perjury to establish a false theme for Mrs. Kramer’s malice for him and the damage to her (and the public) because of it, plus his first attempt to get her to endorse his fraudulent science before he was cease litigating against her.
HERE is why Mrs. Kramer would not sign the fraudulent document she was required to sign on March 9th and was thus sent to jail by Judge Thomas Nugent. Sorry to say, but Judge Thomas Nugent is evidenced to be practicing criminal acts from the bench. He knows that by doing so, he is aiding to defraud the public over the mold issue while thousands of lives continue to be devastated because of it. He unlawfully incarcerated Mrs. Kramer because she refuses to be silenced of his, other Judiciary, their Clerks, Kelman’s, his attorney, Scheuer, and other bad actors’ unlawful roles in the matter. He incarcerated her for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury.
April 13, 2012
NOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE UNDER EXERCISED APPLICATION OF GUARANTEED CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED UNALIENABLE RIGHTS by Sharon Noonan Kramer
Judge Nugent & Bruce Kelman’s attorney, Keith Scheuer, are now trying to hold Mrs. Kramer in Contempt of Court for placing the direct evidence on the Internet of their conspiring to defraud, unlawful incarceration of her & falsification of Sheriff Dept record for her refusal to be coerced into perjury. Attached as exhibits 1 A-D; 2 A-D; and 3 A-B to the April 10, 2012 COMPLAINT by Kelman & Scheuer were Mrs. Kramer’s court filings as posted on this blog and others, providing the direct evidence that Judge Nugent unlawfully incarcerated her for refusing to commit perjury, gave her a false criminal contempt record while incarcerated and then a false civil contempt record when caught conspiring to defraud. Also attached as exhibit were professionals discussing the fraud of this Court and its continued adverse impact on the public on the AIHA LINKED IN CHATBOARD under the thread of “Let’s discuss the jailing of Sharon Kramer for contempt of court over her refusal to keep quiet about on the the author’s past statements concerning the ACOEM paper”. Scheuer signed a DECLARATION of April 10th under penalty of perjury that what he, Kelman and Nugent are unlawlfully doing, is lawful.
A new contempt of court hearing and a trial by a court with no jurisdiction, Judge Thomas Nugent, have been scheduled for June 2012. Mrs. Kramer attended the April 13th unlawful status conference hearings as an observer, without relinquishing her rights. On April 12th, Judge Nugent refused to remove Mrs. Kramer’s false Sheriff Department record, concealing he had incarcerated her for refusing to be coerced into perjury. There were nine court watchers in the room on April 12th who heard Judge Nugent threaten to incarcerate Mrs. Kramer again.
April 12, 2012
NOTICE TO JUDGE THOMAS NUGENT, NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, DEPARTMENT 30, TO CEASE & DESIST HARASSMENT OF SHARON KRAMER
To all parties and their attorney of record, please take notice that on April 12, 2012 at 9am there is an Exparte hearing in Department 30 of the North San Diego County Superior Court, Judge Thomas Nugent presiding. This 5TH NOTICE TO COURT of the need to immediately address the mishandling of contempt charges, libelous Sheriff Department Record and traumatizing, unlawful incarceration/harassment of Kramer to conceal Court et.al., misconduct while defrauding the public, may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me Short Link: http://wp.me/p20mAH-fg The four prior requests, Court’s four replies and correspondences with the San Diego Sheriff Department are read at same link. Some large pdfs may be slow to open. The following information and direct, uncontroverted evidence is found extensively in the case file of Kelman v. Kramer.
In March of 2005, Sharon “Kramer” was the first to publicly write of how it became a fraud in US public health policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm for the purpose of misleading the courts. She named the names of those involved and described how they were connected in mass marketing the deceit: Plaintiff Bruce “Kelman”, his company Globaltox (now known as VeriTox), the Manhattan Institute think-tank, the US Chamber of Commerce, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA) and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine “ACOEM”.
Kramer used the phrase, “altered his under oath statements” to describe Mr. Kelman weaseling on a witness stand in Oregon, February 18, 2005 to hide the trail of the deceptive mass marketing from the eyes of a jury. He was trying to say that the think-tank paid for hire US Chamber’s Mold Position Statement was not connected to the US medical policy setting ACOEM Mold Position Statement; while at the same time having to admit they were closely tied. The forced discussion of the two papers’ true relationship occurred after a prior testimony of Kelman’s from a case in Arizona was permitted into the Oregon trial over Kelman’s shouting of “ridiculous” when asked about the money involvement and the defense counsel’s objections. The phrase was used by Kramer in the sentence, “Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.”
Kelman and his business partner at Veritox, Bryan “Hardin” had authored both of the unscientific and fraudulent policy papers. The two men, who hold no medical degrees, had applied math extrapolations to data taken from a single rodent study and based solely on these calculations had professed they had proven all claims of illness and death from “toxic mold” were only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”. When serving extensively as prolific expert defense witnesses, they claim they have proven these illnesses “Could not be.” caused by the moldy buildings – based solely on their math extrapolations. Their conclusions have never been duplicated and their testimony is a scientific fraud on the courts.
Never the less, ACOEM – which is a trade association of workers comp physicians with several of their members making their livings denying the workplace caused injury – legitimized the science fraud in 2002, by making it appear to be the scientific understanding of thousands of learned physicians.
In 2003, the US Chamber then mass marketed it to the private sector stakeholders and to US Courts. Kelman states under oath that he and Hardin were paid by the think-tank to write the sentence for the US Chamber “Thus, the notion that ‘toxic mold’ is an insidious, secret ‘killer,’ as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is ‘junk science’ unsupported by actual scientific study.” for the express purpose that it could be shared with judges.
Kelman and Veritox sued Kramer in May of 2005 claiming her phrase “altered his under oath statements” was a maliciously false accusation of perjury. The case was Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer. North San Diego County Superior Court. All courts to oversee the case suppressed the evidence that Kelman committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice – reason for malice is a requirement in libel litigation. All courts suppressed the evidence that Kramer gave an unimpeached explanation of why she used that phrase.
False hearsay documents got into the jury room in August of 2008, causing a verdict for Kelman. Kramer prevailed over VeriTox. The Plaintiff Special Jury Instructions instructed the jurors that they had to find Kramer had malice for Kelman, personally, and her writing was incorrect. The trial judge, Lisa C Shall, was under public admonishment from the Commission on Judicial Performance “CJP” at the time of trial and was moved to Family Court. This was her last case to oversee in civil court. Since she has been in family court, many families have submitted complaints to the CJP. She is still on the bench.
After trial, the judgment document was falsified and anti-dated by her clerk, Michael Garland. Kramer was not acknowledged as a trial prevailing party on the document. What the Appellate Court then did on review in September of 2010 is one for the history books. Among other aspects, they fixed the Opinion to make it appear a judgment had been entered in Kramer’s favor. Then CCMS was falsified in December of 2010 to state Globaltox prevailed in trial, which made the electronic history of the case that all courts share, consistent with the fraudulent judgment document that was actually on record of only Kelman being the prevailing party in trial.
As a result of the courts practicing politics from the bench and willfully deeming the wrong party to be the malicious liar, thousands of lives have been destroyed by the inability to receive medical treatment or restitution for injury. Billions of dollars of insurer liability has been shifted to the tax payer because the insurer can feign generally accepted scientific proof that the moldy buildings do not cause illness and thus they are not financially responsible for the illnesses and deaths.
With the assistance of Kelman’s attorney, Keith “Scheuer” the Fourth District Division One “Appellate Court”, twice took Kramer’s accurate writing and made it appear to be a malicious lie. In their 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion and their 2010 “review” Opinion, they made it appear that Kramer falsely accused Kelman of getting caught lying on the Oregon witness stand about being paid by the think-tank to author ACOEM’s Mold Position Statement. They framed Kramer for libel.
But as hard as the courts may try, they cannot get around the direct evidence that Kramer’s writing accurately states Kelman was paid by the think-tank to author the US Chamber’s Mold Statement. And that ACOEM’s was “version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece”.
On March 9, 2012, this Court sent Kramer to jail for two nights for refusing to be coerced to commit criminal perjury and aid the courts to continue to defraud the public and US courts, by concealing their role in aiding the fraud to continue by what they have been doing to Kramer for now seven years. The Court sent Kramer to jail for refusing to sign an apology, under penalty of perjury, that she did not mean to accuse Mr. Kelman of perjury, knowing full well that she did not do that in her writing. The prior courts made her truthful writing appear that way, with this Court suppressing the evidence of it, in its case file. The proposed retraction Kramer refused to sign on March 9th was crafted by the architect of the framing of Kramer for libel with actual malice, Scheuer, onFebruary 10, 2012.
On March 26th and again on April 5th, the Court submitted false documents to the San Diego Sheriff Department that Kramer was lawfully incarcerated by the Court for violating the January 19th Contempt of Court Order. This was to conceal that Kramer was, in reality, sent to jail by this Court for refusing to commit the crime of perjury.
(Attached hereto as Exhibit 1, is the fraudulent retraction the Court required Kramer to sign to avoid incarceration along with the evidence of why she could not sign it without being a coerced criminal participant in defrauding the public.) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/ce5fe87905.pdf
(Attached hereto as Exhibit 2, is the Minute Order of March 9th, stating Kramer was sent to jail for refusing to sign the fraudulent retraction under penalty of perjury) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/d702f8ee18.pdf
(Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 are the Minute Orders of March 26th and April 5th that were sent from the Court to the Sheriff Department libelously stating Kramer was lawfully incarcerated for violating the January 19th Order of Contempt & April 3rd Minute Order of the Court refusing to remove the libel.) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/ef3990c4ce.pdf
(Attached hereto as Exhibit 4, is the transcript of the March 9th sentencing hearing showing the Honorable Thomas Nugent knows he incarcerated a never impeached US citizen for refusing to commit criminal perjury while aiding the courts to continue to defraud the public and that Kramer could not comply with the Contempt of Court Order to avoid incarceration at the hands of the compromised courts) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/ac0b9ecc72.pdf
(Attached hereto as Exhibit 5, is Kramer’s February 10th, Notice to Court of Inability to Comply With Unlawful Order & Judgment of Contempt, January 19, 2012) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/5002768ab6.pdf
Kramer used to have a net worth of approximately $3M. Now, she and her husband teeter on the verge of bankruptcy directly because of seven years of being framed for libel with actual malice by the compromised San Diego Superior Court and the compromised Fourth District Division One Appellate Court – while she is forced to watch thousands of lives continue to be destroyed by their criminal actions. The Court also knows that Kramer is a superior problem solver who has held up well considering she has suffered tremendous emotional damage and stress from being “in a hostile environment” and “subject and aligned to libel” for now seven years at the hands of the Court. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is the mental status examination of Kramer, submitted to the Court on February 10, 2012) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/41fcecfd34.pdf
This Exparte hearing in necessary for this Court to explain how it will be mitigating the damage to Kramer and her husband, including but not limited to libeling her in documents sent from the Court to the San Diego County Sheriff Department on March 26th and April 5th, 2012 to conceal that the Court unlawfully incarcerated Kramer for refusing to commit criminal perjury on March 9, 2012, which would have aided the courts to continue to defraud the public of billions of dollars.
April 11, 2012
SHARON KRAMER IS DEMANDING THE COURT, PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF COUNSEL & PUBLIC DEFENDER STOP HARASSING HER BY UNLAWFUL MEANS
Kramer is demanding that this Court immediately stop the harassment of her by unlawful means while aiding Kelman and the insurance industry to continue to defraud the public. The Court does not have jurisdiction to hold Kramer in contempt of court, sanction her or to hold a trial in the matter of Kelman v. Kramer.
According to California Code of Civil Procedure, no judgment is valid for any purpose until lawfully entered. The “Judgment Document” from Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer submitted to this Court by Kelman’s attorney, Scheuer, onNovember 4, 2010 upon which this entire case is founded, is fraudulent. The Court is aware of this fact and simply chooses to ignore the evidence while assuming unlawful jurisdiction and harassing Kramer by taking unlawful actions to conceal that the Court has no jurisdiction.
The Judgment Document was anti-dated twice by Clerk of the Superior Court, Michael Garland. In mid-October 2008 a dollar amount awarding costs to Kelman was filled in by Garland without dating and making it appear costs were awarded to Kelman on September 24, 2008. On December 18, 2008,Garland added his initials next to the dollar amount he had filled in on the document in mid October making it appear costs were first awarded in mid-December, 2008.
On November 4, 2010 Scheuer submitted it to this Court as the valid legal judgment document from the prior case. It is inconsistent with the Abstract of Judgment Scheuer obtained from the Courts December 30, 2008. It is inconsistent with the illegal Lien that Scheuer and Kelman placed on Kramer’s property onJanuary 20, 2009that falsely reflects interest accruing costs were awarded to Kelman onSeptember 24, 2008.
September 24, 2008 is three weeks before Kelman’s costs were even submitted by Scheuer in mid-October and, three months before Garland added his initials in mid-December to the document next to the awarding of costs he had filled in, in mid-October. In addition, Scheuer commingled his clients’ funds and submitted costs incurred by trial loser GlobalTox (and undisclosed owner, Bryan Hardin, whose being a party was concealed by the Fourth District Division One “Appellate Court” in the falsified Remittitur of December 20, 2012. Hardin is the sixth owner Veritox and a retired Assistant US Surgeon General, retired Deputy Director of CDC NIOSH. Kelman comes to the mold issue from Big Tobacco).
Stephen Kelly, Clerk of the Appellate Court falsified the Remittutur in December 2010 under seal of the State of California. The Appellate Court CCMS was then falsified to make it appear GlobalTox and thus Hardin were disclosed on the Certificate of Interested Parties that Scheuer had submitted to the Appellate Court in September of 2009. In reality, Kelman was the only disclosed “Respondent” on appeal.
The judgment document from Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer that this entire case is founded upon is inconsistent with the amended judgment of October 28, 2011. Kramer had to have the lower court acknowledge in a judgment that she prevailed in trial over Veritox (and Hardin) because the Appellate Court falsified the 2010 Appellate Opinion to state a judgment had been entered in Kramer’s favor when they knew it had not. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 7, is the letter Kramer sent to Kelly and Superior Court Clerk Michael Roddy on September 11, 2011, asking they undo the falsification of court documents and the awarding of costs to undisclosed parties.) This is one of the five letters for which Kramer was held in Contempt and unlawfully incarcerated. They are all read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/f8a1a9104b.pdf
On September 22, 2011 in this case, Kramer submitted a Motion To Nullify the Void Temporary Injunctive Relief Order that was granted by this Court on May 2, 2011 while knowingly relying of the fraudulent judgment document from the prior case submitted to the Court by Scheuer on November 4, 2010. The Court denied the Motion on October 21, 2011 and sanctioned Kramer $19,343.95 with no explanation given. The Court records were then falsified by this Court’s clerk(s) to state a tentative ruling was issued on October 20, 2011 regarding the denial. There was no such tentative ever issued. The Court has never explained in writing on what grounds it denied the Motion to Nullify or what document gives the Court jurisdiction to proceed with this case. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 & 9 collectively are relevant portions of Kramer’s Motion to Nullify and evidence of court clerks, Garland, Kelly, Lum and Karini falsification of the Court Record concealing judicial misconduct & lack of this Court’s jurisdiction.) Read online at:
KRAMER WAS NOT INCARCERATED FOR VIOLATION OF JANUARY 2012 CONTEMPT ORDER AS FALSELY STATED IN SHERIFF DEPARTMENT RECORD, APRIL 5, 2012
The Court’ unlawful incarceration of Kramer on March 12 to March 14, 2012 was not for violating the Contempt of Court “Order” of January 19, 2012 as libelous documents submitted to the Sheriff Department by the Court on March 26 and April 5, 2012 reflect. (See Exhibit 3) Prior to the incarceration, the Court was provided direct evidence that Kramer could not comply with the Order and why Kramer could not comply. (See Exhibit 5)
Kramer’s February 10, 2012 Notice of Inability to Comply includes declarations of website owners who refused to remove posts containing the words, “altered his under oath statements” in the best interest of public health. This is because the posts also show how what the courts have been doing to Kramer for now seven years has permitted the fraud of Veritox, ACOEM and the US Chamber to continue to destroy the lives of thousands. As stated in the Order & Judgment for Contempt, signed by this Court on January 19, 2012, and submitted to the Sheriff Department, while libeling Kramer of why she was incarcerated:
[Contempt Order quoting from the unlawful May 2, 2011 TIRO issued by this Court with no jurisdiction. The TIRO enjoins Kramer from republishing a sentence that is not even in her purportedly libelous writing of March 2005 containing words for which she was never sued. Kramer was only sued for five words, “altered his under oath statements” as used in the sentence, “Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand”.]
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, during the pendency of this action, defendant Sharon Kramer is enjoined and restrained from stating, repeating or publishing, by any means whatsoever, the following statement: ‘Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ while he testified as a witness in an Oregon lawsuit.”
1. Contemner, with full knowledge of the preliminary injunction, republished the defamatory statement by posting it on the Internet (i) on Katy’s Exposure website on September 13, 2011; (ii) on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom on November 3, 2011, which linked to an article on Katy’s Exposure website dated November 3, 2011: (iii) on the Katy’s Exposure website on November 4, 2011: and (iv) on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom on November 5, 2011, which linked to an article, also dated November 5, 2011 on the Katy’s Exposure website.
2. The preliminary injunction is a valid order. Kramer at all times was able to comply with its terms, and she willfully chose not to.
(c) That the contemer is sentenced to spend a total of five days in the San Diego County jail, pursuant to C.C.P. section 1218(a), which shall be suspended upon the condition that, prior to February 6, 2012, contemner publish a retraction on Katy’s Exposure website and on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom of the defamatory statement set forth in the preliminary injunction. Further, pursuant to C.C.P. section 1218(a), contemner is ordered to pay to Plaintiff the attorney’s fees and costs incurred by Plantiff in this action in the amount of $19,343.95.
The reason the Court wanted these five posts removed and why the website owners refused is because they provide the direct evidence of how the courts framed Kramer for libel over the words, “altered his under oath statements”, suppressed the evidence that Kelman committed perjury to establish malice, suppressed the evidence of falsified court documents and how this Court gagged Kramer from being able to write of it – while having no jurisdiction to do so. (See Exhibit 5 for website owners’ declarations submitted to court on February 10th).
KRAMER WAS INCARCERATED FOR REFUSING TO BE COERCED INTO CRIMINAL PERJURY BY COURT ON MARCH 9, 2012
Kramer was incarcerated by the Court for refusing to sign a fraudulent document she was ordered to sign under penalty of perjury by this Court on March 9, 2012. Her coerced signature to avoid unlawful incarceration would have aided to conceal this Court knows it does not have jurisdiction – among many other judicial, clerk, attorney and plaintiff misdeeds over the past seven years that have aided to defraud the public while harassing Kramer. From the transcript of March 14, 2012while the Court had Kramer appear before him, Scheuer and self professed public defender, Tracey “Sang” in shackles, chains and prison garb as a “courtesy” to Scheuer, after two nights of unlawful incarceration. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is the March 14th transcript) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/7d3aa647c3.pdf
THE COURT:….You know what my hope is – and I’m not asking you to respond. I’m not asking you to say anything. –But that is, it seemed to me in our last meeting I recalled you enve said that it wasn’t you who had accused the gentleman of perjury or of altering his testimony, it was rather counsel’s effort to try to make it sound that way. I don’t know if I remembered that right or not. If you did say that or if that’s how you feel. More importantly, I would really strongly urge that you give every consideration to agreeing to that proposal that Counsel made, which simply said “I did not mean that”.”I didn’t mean to suggest that”. I’m not saying you have to do that. I’m not. Don’t hear that from me. But you did hear the important thing.
MS. KRAMER: No. I did not hear the important thing. I didn’t hear an apology that the courts framed me for libel seven years ago and I’m sitting here in handcuffs for speaking the truth about a fraud in policy. If you want to send me back to jail, fine. But I’m not signing an apology for the court doing that.
THE COURT: Okay. That’s not a condition of anything.
Kramer’s signature on the required false retraction was no longer required by March 14, 2012 after she had been given a false criminal record and unlawfully incarcerated for refusing to commit criminal perjury on March 9th. The Minute Order of March 9, 2012 states:
Court addresses Ms. Kramer re: proposed retraction order. Ms. Kramer indicates that she will not sign the proposed retraction. Court finds Ms. Kramer in contempt and sentences her to five consecutive days in custody and directs her to report to the Los Colinas Detention Facility at9:00 am, March 12, 2012.
The proposed retraction for Kramer to sign was crafted by Scheuer. It states in relevant part:
“It was not my intention in writing the press release to state or imply that Dr. Kelman had committed perjury. I do not believe that Dr. Kelman committed perjury. I apologize to Dr. Kelman and his colleagues at Veritox, Inc., for all the statements that I have made that stated or implied otherwise. I sincerely regret any harm or damage I may have caused. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct “
CONTEMPT OF COURT HEARING WAS STAGED SHAM WITH GOAL OF DEEMING KRAMER CRIMINALLY AND MENTALLY INCOMPETENT AIDED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDERS’ OFFICE
The Contempt of Court hearing was held on January 6, 2012. Court appointed legal advisor, Tracey “Sang” Esq., spoke at the hearing without being sworn in as a witness. This was directly against Pro Per Kramer’s directive that Sang, who is not Kramer’s attorney of record and never has been, was not to speak at the hearing. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 11, is Kramer’s contempt of court affidavit of January 6th stating Sang was not to speak on her behalf at trial.) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/0d28f47383.pdf
On January 5, 2012, Kramer went to the Court exparte to try to stop the contempt hearing in which the Court lacked jurisdiction because the judgment document this entire case is founded upon is fraudulent. The Court stated it would address it s jurisdictional problems before the hearing – but never did and launched right into the attack that Kramer is mentally incompetent in need of Sang. (Attached hereto as Exhibits 12 & 13 are Kramer’s Exparte Motion of January 5th and transcript of the Exparte hearing) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/762a39504a.pdf
In the Contempt of Court trial of January 6th, it was Public Defender, Sang, who introduced the discussion of Penal Code 1368 which is what is used to deem a criminal defendant mentally incompetent and force the public defender to become their legal voice. The Court stated, “She [Kramer] has got to be charged with a misdemeanor” – before a mental evaluation of Kramer could take place under Penal Code 1368, with the obvious intent of wanting Kramer deemed mentally incompetent to hide the mass collusion by the Courts to defraud the public, by what they have been doing to whistleblower, Kramer, for now over seven years.
On April 9, 2012, Kramer asked Court appointed and “legal” advisor, Sang, the yes or no question, “Were you directed to bring up 1368 at the Contempt hearing?” Sang would not answer the simple yes or no question. (Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 in the transcript of the Contempt of Court hearing in relevant part) Read online at: http://freepdfhosting.com/3b54d6a257.pdf
While Kramer was unlawfully incarcerated between March 12th and March 14th , her civil contempt charge morphed into criminal contempt, a misdemeanor. If it were not for a private sector website, JailBase, Kramer would never have known that a false criminal charge was placed on her Sheriff Department record and she was vulnerable to being subjected to a Penal Code 1368.1 trial where she would have been deemed mentally incompetent by the “psych unit downtown” with Sang then becoming her Court appointed attorney of record.
The Contempt hearing was a set up with the magic words being said by both the Court and Sang to further a Kramer mental incompetency/criminal contempt defense for the Court’s et.al., colluding to defraud the public. In the words of the Court and Sang on January 6, 2012, conspiring with Scheuer to a false misdemeanor and mental incompetency of Kramer for refusing to be silenced of the courts framing her for libel, rewarding Kelman’s perjury and its continued adverse impact on the public:
THE HONORABLE THOMAS NUGENT:…I’m telling you if you have any influence with her, I would do anything I could to get her examined, if I can, by the psychiatric unit downtown. I was prepared to see if I could get that done today and, you know, people aren’t supposed to participate in criminal proceedings if they’re incompetent, and her competence, in my mind is a serious question.
DEFENDER OF THE PUBLIC SANG: I, too, have given thought to this very issue, Your Honor, and Counsel and I were discussing it before this hearing. What I am – as a criminal attorney, the mechanisms that I usually use in situations like this is a 1368.
THE HONORABLE THOMAS NUGENT: 1368. I know it well.
DEFENDER OF THE PUBLIC SANG: It’s really the only thing that I believe we have at our disposal.
THE HONORABLE THOMAS NUGENT She’s got to be charged with a misdemeanor. I just read this section …
THE HONORABLE THOMAS NUGENT: …I’ve tried with her. I remember the other case was when a fellow was off his medication and I told him I wanted no part of making his life more miserable for him than it already was. All he had to do was take his medication. Like talking to a wall. He wasn’t listening to that. Never did listen. They had to find him guilty. He did time. Tough stuff. If you can think of a way to create that defense [sic, of the Court, Kelman, Scheuer & Sang for their conspiring to defraud] I think that would be something that might be interesting….
Penal Code 1368 states, “(a) If, during the pendency of an
action and prior to judgment, a doubt arises in the mind of the judge as to the mental competence of the defendant, he or she shall state that doubt in the record and inquire of the attorney for the defendant whether, in the opinion of the attorney, the defendant is mentally competent. If the defendant is not represented by counsel, the court shall appoint counsel. At the request of the defendant or his or her counsel or upon its own motion, the court shall recess the proceedings for as long as may be reasonably necessary to permit counsel to confer with the defendant and to form an opinion as to the mental competence of the defendant at that point in time. (b) If counsel informs the court that he or she believes the defendant is or may be mentally incompetent, the court shall order that the question of the defendant’s mental competence is to be determined in a hearing which is held pursuant to Sections 1368.1 and 1369. If counsel informs the court that he or she believes the defendant is mentally competent, the court may nevertheless order a hearing. Any hearing shall be held in the superior court. (c) Except as provided in Section 1368.1, when an order for a hearing into the present mental competence of the defendant has been issued, all proceedings in the criminal prosecution shall be suspended until the question of the present mental competence of the defendant has been determined. If a jury has been impaneled and sworn to try the defendant, the jury shall be discharged only if it appears to the court that undue hardship to the jurors would result if the jury is retained on call. If the defendant is declared mentally incompetent, the jury shall be discharged.”
On March 26, 2012, the Court directed the Sheriff Department to remove Kramer’s false criminal contempt record under PC 166 that it had given Kramer on March 12, 2012, while incarcerated for refusing to commit criminal perjury. On March 26, 2012, the Court directed the Sheriff Department to replace the false criminal contempt with a false civil contempt under CCP1218(a). The Court and the Sheriff Department left the misdemeanor (for civil contempt) on Kramer’s record.
On March 28th, Ms. Debra “Duncan”, Supervisor of the San Diego Sheriff Department Records Department, sent an email to the Court asking if Kramer’s criminal record (for civil contempt) should reflect a misdemeanor or a felony. This email from the Sheriff Department to the Court indicates two unlawful actions while harassing Kramer to conceal the courts et. al., colluding to defraud:
1.) It was not a clerical error of the Sheriff Department that Kramer’s civil contempt charge morphed into criminal contempt while she was incarcerated. Had it been their clerical error, the Sheriff Department would have removed the misdemeanor from Kramer’s record when directed by the Court to remove the criminal contempt error on March 26, 2012; and
2.) The Sheriff Department was willing to leave a false misdemeanor on Kramer’s record even after being made aware this was a civil contempt matter. Kramer would have never known if not for the website JailBase and would have been vulnerable to a PC 1368.1 hearing. A false misdemeanor on Kramer’s Sheriff Department Record was/is required by the Court before they could/can attempt to deem Kramer mentally incompetent under PC1368 in need of Sang to conceal the seven years of unlawful actions by the courts, their clerks, plaintiff, plaintiff counsel, Sang and now it appears, the Sheriff Department; and
3.) This Court’s case file establishes the Court knows Kramer was framed for libel with actual malice by prior courts and Scheuer – over the first public writing of how it became a fraud inUSpublic health policy that moldy buildings do not harm. This Court was willing to go so far as to unlawfully incarcerate Kramer and falsify Sheriff Department records, while knowing its actions are aiding the billions in fraud to continue. This, with no jurisdiction over the case and ignoring that Scheuer submitted a judgment document that was falsified by the courts themselves in the prior case, as the sole foundation for the case.
There is a trial readiness conference scheduled for 10am on April 13, 2012. There will be no trial in this case. The Court does not have jurisdiction to hold such a trial because the judgment document from Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, upon which this entire case is founded is fraudulent. This Exparte hearing is necessary for the Court to explain its intent of how the San Diego County Superior Court, the State Appellate Court, the County Sheriff Department, the State Administration of the Court and the County Public Defender’s office will be mitigating their collective damages to Kramer, by subjecting and aligning her to libel for seven years.
District Attorney, Bonnie Dumanis is aware the Appellate Court framed Kramer for libel with actual malice and its aiding of the continuance of workers comp insurer fraud in California and in San Diego county. To date, Dumanis has taken no action to stop the criminal activity in San Diego county courts.
The State Bar knows, but claims to have lost the documents while simultaneously claiming they have reviewed the file.The Commission on Judicial Performance knows, but also claims there is no complaint in their file from 2009 (which provided the direct evidence all courts suppressed the evidence that Kelman committed perjury and Scheuer repeatedly suborned it to establish false theme for malice – including their Chairwoman, Justice Judith McConnell). San Diego Superior Court presiding Judge, Kevin Enright also knows what has unlawfully taken place in the courts that aids fraud to continue along with the continued harassment of Kramer by his courts; as does Clerk of the Superior Court, Michael Roddy.
It is necessary for the Court to explain what it will be informing the State Bar of Scheuer’s and Sang’s unlawful actions aided by this Court in furthering seven years of malicious litigation against Kramer while defrauding the public of billions of dollars. It is necessary for the Court to explain what punishment Kelman will be receiving for committing criminal perjury to establish needed reason for malice in libel litigation over a writing impacting public health, claims handling practices and mold litigations nationwide – for now seven years.
It is necessary for this Court to explain its intended actions to remove the libelous civil contempt of court of violating the January 19, 2012 Order of Contempt from Kramer’s Sheriff Department and Department of Justice record, as the reason for her incarceration.
April 10, 2012 __________________________________________
Sharon Kramer, Pro Per
DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER
On April 11, 2012, I emailed this Exparte Application to Scheuer. On April 9, 2012 I spoke to Scheuer and informed him of this Exparte hearing. He immediately fired back with a new contempt of court complaint of my placing the court documents on the Internet with the direct evidence that this Court incarcerated me for refusing to commit criminal perjury and falsified the Sheriff Department Records to conceal the unlawful incarceration – – not for violating the Order of Contempt. Scheuer’s newest complaint is attached as Exhibit 15) He did not attach exhibits. It may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me and at: http://freepdfhosting.com/d25bac26e7.pdf
This is not just going to go away. First the courts framed me for libel with actual malice over the first public writing of how it became a fraud inUS public health policy that moldy buildings do not harm – as they suppressed the evidence that the plaintiff committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice. They falsified many court documents, including the final judgment document from the case. They awarded costs to undisclosed parties by falsified Appellate Opinions of 2006 & 2010 and lower court falsified judgment of December 2008.
Then in a second case gagged me from being able to write of what prior courts had done by gagging me from writing the words for which I was framed by prior courts, “altered his under oath statements”. They found me in Contempt of Court for seeking help to stop the continued harassment and letting it be publicly known what was occurring – with the Court failing to establish jurisdiction and again, court records falsified to conceal the Court’s actions.
Then the Court unlawfully incarcerated me and gave me a false criminal record when website owners refused to take the evidence of the colluding to defraud off of the Internet in the public’s best interest. I was incarcerated for refusing to be coerced by the Court to commit criminal perjury. My signature would have absolved seven years of Judicial, clerk, attorney and plaintiff misconduct. .
Then, when removing the false criminal contempt record, the Court gave me a false civil contempt record to conceal that the Court had unlawfully incarcerated me for refusing to sign a fraudulent document, under penalty of perjury – not for violating the Contempt Order –as the Court left the false misdemeanor on my record.
When the Court was demanded by Kramer to remove the libelously false misdemeanor on April 5th from Kramer’s Sheriff Department and Department of Justice record, it replaced it with a false civil contempt of court record. In reality, this Court has no jurisdiction to hold Kramer in contempt of anything, civil or criminal, as the judgment document from the prior case that this entire case is founded upon is fraudulent.
I currently have a lien on my property for costs incurred by a party I prevailed over in trial with interest accruing from three weeks before costs were even submitted and three months before the judgment document this whole case is founded upon states costs were awarded. I owe $700 to undisclosed “Respondents” on appeal. I have a new lien in the amount of $19,343.95 for Contempt of Court with no explanation given. ClerksGarland, Kelly, Lum and Karini are all evidenced to falsified court documents regarding these awarding of costs to Kelman et. al.
While unlawfully incarcerated and given a false criminal record, I was traumatized by a “prophylactic experience” of being strip searched in jail. On March 9th ,Scheuer requested of the Court I be given a “prophylactic experience” and the Court guaranteed Scheuer I would have one.
I was further traumatized on the morning of March 14, 2012, when I was shackled to a drug addict for an hour bus ride, in the dark, from the Las Colinas Women’s Detention Center in Santee, California to the courthouse in Vista. I was made to appear before the Judge, Scheuer and compromised Public Defender, Sang, in handcuffs, chains, jail garb, unbrushed hair, no make up and very little sleep for two nights.
I was scared while housed for two nights in a dorm setting with approximately forty tweekers, prostitutes, shop lifters and heroine addicts because I dared to speak the truth of the defrauding of the US public and US courts over the mold issue, permitted to continue by the courts to oversee Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer and Kelman v. Kramer. The Court stated he notified Scheuer of the March 14th hearing as a “courtesy” so he could be there. The Court did not state why Sang, who I had expressly terminated on March 9, 2012 after twice asking the court to remove her, was notified and at the hearing.
On March 13, 2012, my clothes were ordered to be sent from the jail to the courthouse. I was oddly released from the Vistacourthouse – not the jail. This is an indication that the Court was intending to transfer me “downtown to the psych unit” while there was a false misdemeanor on my record and I was in unlawful custody – with Sang then becoming my court appointed “legal” voice.
God only knows what would have happened to me on that day if my husband, mother and sister had not been in the courtroom. My husband became aware of the hearing because it was posted as scheduled on the Sheriff Department website on Monday March 12th within hours of my arrival to the jail and being given a false criminal misdemeanor on my record
I am precluded from filing appeals for this Court’s down right criminal actions and continuing harassment by this Court, Scheuer and Kelman. Stephen Kelly, Clerk of the Appellate Court who falsified the Remittitur in December of 2010 and altered the CCMS to match; called me on October 5, 2011 and stated that the Presiding Justice -who was the first to frame me for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion, Justice Judith McConnell – would simply deem me to be a vexatious litigant.
One month after the first judge, Michael Orfield denied my anti-SLAPP motion while suppressing the evidence that Kelman committed perjury to establish false theme for malice, Governor Schwarzenegger endorsed the ACOEM Mold Statement, penned by Kelman and Hardin and a UCLA physician, Andrew Saxon, – into California Workers Comp policy under the guise of “workers comp reform”. What it really is, is a massive insurer cost shifting scheme while leaving sick workers and their families to fend for themselves.
When Justice Judith McConnell framed me for libel with actual malice in the Appellate anti-SLAPP Opinion of November 2006, Kelman was serving as an expert defense witness for the US Department of Justice to defeat federal liability for claims of illnesses in military housing.
In February of 2007, the late Senator Edward Kennedy, (Schwarzenegger’s uncle) and the US Democrat Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee, deleted from a Federal Government Accountability Office audit scope, looking into who had the conflicts of interests in setting policy over the mold issue. The audit was ordered at my urging.
On March 13, 2012, while I was unlawfully incarcerated for refusing to commit the crime of perjury to defraud the public, Kelman was serving as an expert for the Social Security Administration in Orange County, CA. He was hired to write a letter stating the SSA building was safe for the employees – based on his fraudulent toxicology model alone used to deny the plausibility of causation of individual illnesses from chemical exposures known to be present in the building and the ground upon which the building sits. There is an atypical amount of cancer and autoimmune diseases in the workers in this building. It is fraudulent to state that a modeling theory can prove the building is safe for them.
If I am lying about the courts framing me for libel with actual malice and all the above corruption to cover for prior corruption defrauding the public, it would be very simple to prove. One would only need to provide two pieces of evidence:
1. That I was ever impeached as to my belief that Kelman “altered his under oath statements” while obfuscating and flip flopping back and forth about the truth connection of ACOEM and the US Chamber in mass marketing the fraud, once forced to discuss the papers together in front of a jury.
2. That I had malice, personally for Kelman because I was “furious the science conflicted with my dreams of a remodeled home, so I launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputation of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox”. (I received approximately a half of a million dollars in my own mold litigation of long ago with Michael P. Orfield signing all three of the settlement agreements.)
All I have to do is keep telling the truth until some elected, appointed or hired government employee decides to do the job they are paid to do on behalf of the citizens of California and the United States, and shuts down the rampant corruption in California’s judicial branch and ancillary agencies by punishing those involved for their unlawful roles in the cases of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer and Kelman v. Kramer.
I declare under penalty of perjury in the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and executed by me this day,April 11, 2012 in Escondido, California.
Sharon Kramer, Pro Per