Kelman v. Kramer MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THOMAS P. NUGENT “INSTANT JUDGE”

  DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THOMAS P. NUGENT, “INSTANT JUDGE”

          1. On March 9, 2012, the Honorable Thomas P. Nugent “INSTANT JUDGE” stated to me in open court that I had to sign a document which contains the sentence, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury” or report to the Las Colinas Women s Detention Center for five days of incarceration. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1[1] is the March 9, 2012 Transcript pp.2:13 -25, pp.7:17-28) [1] March 9, 2012 Transcript  http://freepdfhosting.com/402c0b63b8.pdf

          2. The document was crafted by Respondent Bruce J. KELMAN’s counsel, Keith SCHEUER. It was presented to INSTANT JUDGE on February 10, 2012, RETRACTION BY SHARON KRAMER. My signature was required under penalty of perjury to avoid incarceration. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2[2] is the proposed February 10, 2012 RETRACTION BY SHARON KRAMER submitted to INSTANT JUDGE by SCHEUER) [2]February 10, 2012 SCHEUER’s Proposed Retraction http://freepdfhosting.com/98b8547350.pdf

          3. On March 9, 2012 I refused to be coerced into criminal perjury by INSTANT JUDGE. I refused to sign the fraudulent February 10, 2012 RETRACTION under penalty of perjury, for being framed for libel with actual malice by KELMAN, SCHEUER and all courts to oversee the litigation of KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER; and then gagged from writing of it by INSTANT JUDGE in KELMAN v. KRAMER.  (See EXHIBIT 1 pp.4:23-28, pp.5, pp.6:1-7)[1] March 9, 2012 Transcript  http://freepdfhosting.com/402c0b63b8.pdf

          4. INSTANT JUDGE sentenced me to jail for refusing to be coerced to commit perjury and sign the fraudulent February 10, 2012 RETRACTION. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 3[3] is the March 9, 2012 Minute Order) It states I was incarcerated for refusing to sign the proposed retraction:[3] March 9, 2012 Minute Order http://freepdfhosting.com/ff3c5d5b9c.pdf

  Ms. Kramer indicates that she will not sign the proposed retraction. Court finds Ms. Kramer in contempt and sentences her to five consecutive days in custody and directs her to report to the Las Colinas Detention Facility at 9:00 am on March 12, 2012. 

          5. On April 5, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE issued, hand signed and sent a Minute Order to the San Diego County Sheriff Deparment directing them to remove the false misdemeanor that had been placed on my record as of March 12, 2012 while unlawfully incarcerated.

          6. On April 5, 2012, at the same time INSTANT JUDGE ordered the false misdemeanor removed from my Sheriff Department record, INSTANT JUDGE again libeled me and falsified my Sheriff Department Record to state that he had lawfully ordered me incarcerated for Civil Contempt of Court under CCP1218(a)

         7 On April 5, 2012 he attached as false exhibit to the Minute Order of why he had me incarcerated the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER  AND JUDGMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT, which states I was to be incarcerated if there was not a retraction of the words, “altered his under oath statements”  posted on two websites by February 6, 2012, the five words that KELMAN, SCHEUER and the courts had framed me for libel and found within the first public writing of how it became a fraudulent concept in public health, workers comp policy and US courts that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm.. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 4[4] is the April 5, 2012 Minute Order with the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER attached as false exhibit pp.4:22-28, pp.5:1-6 not the February 10. 2012 RETRACTION attached that I refused to sign under penalty of perjury and concealing this was the real reason I was unlawfully sent to jail by INSTANT JUDGE ) [4] April 5, 2012 Minute Order w/January 19, 2012 Revised Order attached http://freepdfhosting.com/3f9fe215eb.pdf

The below is criminal falsification of a public record by an officer of the court and malicious libel to conceal that a judge incarcerated a US citizen for refusing to be coerced into perjury which would have aided him and others to defraud the public; and conceal the citizen was framed for libel by the plaintiff, a California licenced attorney and several California jurists; and then the citizen s Sheriff Department record was libelously falsified to conceal what the judge had maliciously and unlawfully done to the citizen along with the continued harassment of her, damage to her and to the public because of it.

         8. On March 9, 2012, when INSTANT JUDGE had me incarcerated for refusing to be coerced to sign the fraudulent February 10, 2012 RETRACTION; and on April 5, 2012 when INSTANT JUDGE falsified my Sheriff Department Record to fraudulently state he had lawfully incarcerated me under CCP1218(a) for allegedly violating the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER while attaching it as false exhibit; INSTANT JUDGE knew I could not comply with the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER when he sent me to jail.  He knew I did not violate CCP1218(a).

         9. What INSTANT JUDGE ordered in the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER was for websites, which I do not own, to remove the evidence that KELMAN committed perjury in his declarations and SCHEUER repeatedly suborned it to establish needed reason for my purported malice while strategically litigating to silence me of an illicit interstate enterprise, Veritox, Inc. (formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc.); and that all courts to oversee KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER suppressed the evidence of KELMAN’s and SCHEUER’s criminal perjury and suborning of criminal perjury as they framed me for libel with actual malice in matters impacting public health  with many court documents falsified and altered along the way including the judgment document and Remittitur.

          10. (Attached hereto collectively as EXHIBIT 5[5] are the Declarations of Kevin Carstens  and Crystal Stuckey  submitted to INSTANT JUDGE on February 10, 2012)  They are the website owners who stated they refused to remove from their websites what INSTANT JUDGE directed in the January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER, in the name of public health and safety. I.e. the evidence the courts, KELMAN & SCHEUER framed me for libel with actual malice for the words, “altered his under oath statements” ; INSTANT JUDGE gagged me from writing of what they had done and the continued adverse impact on me, my family and the public because of it. [5] February 10, 2012 Carstens & Stuckey Declarations http://freepdfhosting.com/edfc066cb4.pdf

         11. The Carstens and Stuckey Declarations were submitted to INSTANT JUDGE by me on February 10, 2012 (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 6[6] is my February 10, 2012 NOTICE OF INABILITY TO COMPLY  WITH UNLAWFUL CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDER pp.4:11,pp.5, pp.6, pp.7:1-8,24-28) [6] February 10, 2012 Kramer s NOTICE Can t Comply  http://freepdfhosting.com/5002768ab6.pdf

         12. On April 5, 2012 INSTANT JUDGE libeled me and committed a criminal offense under Government Code 6203(a) which states, Every officer authorized by law to make or give any certificate or other writing is guilty of a misdemenaor if he or she makes and delivers as true any certificate or writing containing statements which he or she knows to be false when he falsified my Sheriff Department record to conceal massive collusion, unlawful incarceration and continued unlawful  harassment of me by INSTANT JUDGE, KELMAN and SCHEUER.        

          13. On April 12, 2012 in open court with several witnesses in the room, INSTANT JUDGE refused to remove the criminal and malicious libel from my Sheriff Department Record that is concealing he incarcerated me for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury, which INSTANT JUDGE knows my coerced signature would have aided to defraud the public. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 7[7] is the April 12, 2012 transcript pp.2:5-19, pp.4:9-14,16-19,24-28,pp.5:8-28,pp.6:7-20) http://freepdfhosting.com/a52191aa44.pdf 

          14. Also on April 12, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE stated, “I understand” “I understand” when I stated, “You have no jurisdiction” (EXHIBIT 7 pp.6:21-26) 

          15. On April 24, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE refused to answer my direct yes  or no  question if he has jurisdiction. (Attached hereto as EXHBIT 8[8] is the April 24, 2012 transcript pp.2:2-19,pp.3:7-17,pp.4:8-14). [8] April 24, 2012 Transcript http://freepdfhosting.com/e6187b801d.pdf

          16. On April 10, 2012, the evidence that INSTANT JUDGE incarcerated me for refusing to commit perjury and then falsified my Sheriff Department record to conceal what he had done as found as exhibit in my pleadings, were submitted by SCHEUER as exhibt of why I should be held in contempt of court again by INSTANT JUDGE. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 9[9] are my court exhibits and briefs, which are a matter of public record, that were attached to SCHEUER’s April 10, 2012 Contempt Complaint (also attached) of evidence of why I should be held in contempt and incarcerated again.) [9] April 10, 2012 Scheuer s COMPLAINT http://freepdfhosting.com/d25bac26e7.pdf   Two example exhibits to COMPLAINT are my court exhibits & briefs http://freepdfhosting.com/83abfb3864.pdf

         17. On April 24, 2012, the same day INSTANT JUDGE refused to answer my direct question of whether he has jurisdiction, INSTANT JUDGE accepted SCHEUER s complaint and my court exhibits as lawful evidence of contempt of court and set a new contempt of court hearing date and trial  in a case where he knows he has no jurisdiction. (EXHIBIT 8 pp.1:21-28)

         18. On March 9, 2012, before INSTANT JUDGE sentenced me to jail for refusing to be coerced into committing criminal perjury, he stated to me that a litigant in an entirely unrelated matter, Mr. Richard Shapiro , is disturbed  and no matter what I should  not associate with him. (EXHIBIT 1 pp.9:16-28)

         19. On April 12, 2012, Shaprio, who is not the one who is disturbed,  witnessed INSTANT JUDGE state he understood he does not have jurisdiction in KELMAN v. KRAMER.  (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 10[10] is the May 23, 2012 DECLARATION OF RICHARD A. SHAPIRO; also see EXHIBIT 7 pp.1:16-28) [10] May 22, 2012 Declaration of Shapiro http://freepdfhosting.com/9de751711d.pdf

         20. For good cause, Shapiro and I are both concerned for our own physicial safety and that of each others  if INSTANT JUDGE is able to continue to lay claim of jurisdiction to our cases and continue with his unlawful reign of terror. Mr. Shapiro states,

It appears to me very likely that said judge is attempting to hinder and tamper with my ability to perform witness duties in the Kelman v. Kramer cases, and have Mrs. Kramer perform the same in my two cases, the Shapiro v. Carlsbad, and the Shapiro v. Shapiro case, via highly contaminating unethical and illegal conduct by him which will easily and materially effect the outcome of these two litigants before him.   I feel absolute outrage to have to be going through this nightmare with a judge that is, for all intents and purposes, presumed to be an impartial, ethical individual who can and will decide the issues on the merits and the law, but despite this widely held reasonable presumption, delivers, behind a thin veil of all things good and right, grossly outrageous conduct toward litigants who personally offend him in some way.

          21. On March 14, 2012, prior to releasing me from unlawful custody, INSTANT JUDGE had me  humiliatingly brought before him, SCHEUER and the public defender  he forced on me as a legal advisor, Tracey SANG ; in handcuffs, chains, jail garb, no make-up, unbrushed hair and little sleep from being frightfully incarcerated for two nights in a communal setting with tweekers, prostitutes, heroine addicts and shop lifters.

          22. I became ill from the “prophylactic” experience INSTANT JUDGE assured SCHEUER on March 9th that I would have – of being unlawfully incarcerated with a segment of the population known to be high risk disease and criminal instability, for my refusing to be coerced to commit perjury; and then given a false Sheriff Department record by INSTANT JUDGE  along with many other terrorizing, emotionally traumatizing, unlawful and disgusting statements and actions by INSTANT JUDGE, KELMAN and SCHEUER. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 11[11] is my April 27, 2012, NOTICE TO COURT, ADMINISTRATION OF COURT & PRESIDING JUDGE OF COURT THAT SHARON KRAMER REQUIRES MEDICAL ATTENTION  RESULTANT FROM UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION, HARASSMENT & LIBELING BY THIS COURT WITH NO JURISDICION. pp.0:26-28,pp.5,pp.6,pp.7:1-12,22-28,pp.8:5-25,photo of illness & dr. evaluation) I hand delivered it to INSTANT JUDGE on April 27th, I called Mr. Roddy s office of the matter on May 1st. I did not contact the Superior Court Presiding Judge. In what can only be described as appauling deliberate indifference, I received no reply or offer of help from anyone. I am still sick. [11] April 27, 2012 Notice Requires Medical Attention. http://freepdfhosting.com/976a7ad8c6.pdf

          23. (Attached hereto as EXHIBIT 12[12] is the March 14, 2012 transcript pp.1:15-17,pp.2:3-5,10-28) On March 14, 2012, when INSTANT JUDGE had me brought before him , SCHEUER and SANG in a demeaning state of appearance for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury; INSTANT JUDGE again strongly urged that I sign the fraudulent February 2012 RETRACTION. When I stated. No. What you are asking me to do is collude with the fraud – with the court to defraud the public after seven years ,  INSTANT JUDGE replied, Right. But I’m not conditioning my decision this morning on that.  That’s not a condition.  It was merely a wish.  [12] March 14, 2012 Transcript http://freepdfhosting.com/8413b355a9.pdf

          24. After a long and illustrious career, it appears that INSTANT JUDGE may be losing his falculties and has become abusive, cruel and unusual in his later years.  When a judge states in open court that one litigant is disturbed ; then proceeds to sentence another litigant to jail for refusing to be coerced to commit perjury; then states the incarceration was just for his wish that the litigant would collude with the courts to defraud the public while trying to coerce her again; then falsifies the sheriff department record to conceal what he has done; then refuses to remove the GC6203(a) criminal and malicious libel from the citizen s public record; then threatens contempt of court and more traumatizing for the litigant s evidence of the judge et al., colluding to defraud by unlawful means while terrorizing the litigant; and  still is unable to ascertain that it is time to recuse himself of his own accord for dangerously eggregious bias; it would appear that perhaps it is time for INSTANT JUDGE to retire from the bench for the safety of the public and the safety of litigants who are made to come before him.

          This motion and declaration are submitted in accordance with CCP170.1(a)(6)(A)iii,170.1(a)(6)(B), 170.4(b) . I declare, under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. This declaration is executed on May 24, 2012 in Escondido, California.                                                                                

Sharon Kramer, In Properia Persona 

DECLARATION EXHIBITS IN ENTIRETY & CRONOLIGICAL ORDER

 January 19, 2012 REVISED ORDER & JUDGMENT FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT ……………………………EXHIBIT  4 http://freepdfhosting.com/3f9fe215eb.pdf

(Judge directs that the evidence I was framed for libel over the words, “altered his under oath statements” while the courts suppressed the evidence Kelman committed perjury to establish malice – and what high up judicial branch leaders know of it and its continued adverse impact on the public, must come off the interent or I am going to jail)

February 10, 2012 Kramer  NOTICE OF INABILITY TO COMPLY W/CONTEMPT ORDER…………. EXHIBIT  6 http://freepdfhosting.com/5002768ab6.pdf

(Judge knows I cannot comply with contempt order to avoid being unlawfully incarcerated)

February 10, 2012 Carstens & Stuckey DECLARATIONS……………………………………………………….. .EXHIBIT  5 http://freepdfhosting.com/edfc066cb4.pdf

(Website owners refuse to take the direct evidence off the Internet of the fraud, who all knows of it, and its continued adverse impact on the public)

February 10, 2012 Scheuer’s RETRACTION OF SHARON KRAMER (proposed)……………………….. EXHIBIT  2 http://freepdfhosting.com/98b8547350.pdf

(states I must apologized for being framed for libel and that I do not believe Kelman committed perjury – or go to jail)

March 9, 2012 TRANSCRIPT……………………………………………………………………EXHIBIT  1 http://freepdfhosting.com/402c0b63b8.pdf

(Judge sends me to jail for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury and defraud the public)

March 9, 2012 MINUTE ORDER……………………………………………………………………………EXHIBIT  3 http://freepdfhosting.com/ff3c5d5b9c.pdf

(States I was sent to jail for refusing to sign SCHEUER’s fraudulent February 10, 2012, document)

March 14, 2012 TRANSCRIPT…………………………………………………………………..EXHIBIT 12 http://freepdfhosting.com/8413b355a9.pdf

(Judge says I no longer have to collude to defraud – he will let me out of jail)

April 5, 2012 MINUTE ORDER To Sheriff w/REVISED ORDER falsely attached…………………………..EXHIBIT  4 http://freepdfhosting.com/3f9fe215eb.pdf

(Judge faslifies my incarceration record and fraudulently attaches the January 19th Contempt of Court order to conceal he had me incarcarated for refusing to sign SCHEUER’s February 10, fraudulent apology for being framed for libel with actual malice)  THIS IS CRIMINAL!!!!!!!

April 10, 2012 SCHEUER s COMPLAINT w/ evidence of Jurists  Criminality In Kramer s Public Record Pleading Exhibits as Exhibit for Contempt COMPLAINT                           .EXHIBIT  9 http://freepdfhosting.com/d25bac26e7.pdf 

http://freepdfhosting.com/83abfb3864.pdf

(Submits a new contempt complaint and attaches the evidence the Judge sent me to jail for refusing to be coerced into perjury – and then falsified my Sheriff Department record to conceal what he had done)

April 12, 2012 TRANSCRIPT……………………………………………………………………EXHIBIT  7 http://freepdfhosting.com/a52191aa44.pdf 

(Judge states that he understands he does not have jurisdiction over this case)

April 24, 2012 TRANSCRIPT……………………………………………………………………EXHIBIT  8 http://freepdfhosting.com/e6187b801d.pdf

(Judge will not answer “yes” or “no” whether he has jursidiction.  Proceeds to set a new contempt of court hearing for end of June, based on SCHEUER’s submitted complaint with the evidence Judge unlawfully incarcerated me and falsified my record to conceal what he has done and continues to do.)

 April 27, 2012 NOTICE OF NEED FOR MEDICAL CARE…………………………………………………………. EXHIBIT 10 http://freepdfhosting.com/976a7ad8c6.pdf

(I was made sick while incarcerated.  I am extremely fearful for my safety because of what I KNOW they are going to do next – incarcerate me again to conceal their criminality.  I am extremely fearful for my physical safety if in custody of this Judge again)

May 23, 2012 SHAPIRO DECLARATION………………………………………………EXHIBIT 11 http://freepdfhosting.com/9de751711d.pdf   

(Sharipo submits a declaration that he fears for his safety, too, because he is a witness to what Judge has been doing to me that is CRIMINAL and continues to aid to defraud the public, while concealing MUCH CORRUPTION in the California Judicial Branch) 

Sharon Noonan Kramer

2031 Arborwood Place

Escondido, CA 92029

(760) 746-8026

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH DISTRICT


Sharon Kramer                                   Petitioner                 v.BRUCE J. KELMAN                                  Respondent
Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NCPETITIONER SHARON KRAMER S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY INSTANT JUDGE  MEMORAMDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES; & DELCARATION OF SHARON KRAMER  Thomas P. Nugent Presiding,Department 30

       MOTION TO DISQUALIFY HON. THOMAS P. NUGENT INSTANT JUDGE 

     This Motion To Disqualify Hon. Thomas P. Nugent INSTANT JUDGE may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me http://wp.me/p20mAH-hu It is for good cause and timely filed under Codes of Civil Procedure 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii)[1],170.1(a)(6)(B)[2],170.4(b)[3],664[4], 664.5(b)[5],Government Codes 6200(a)(c)[6],6203(a)[7].

May 24, 2012             _______________________________________________________________________

Sharon Kramer, a natural born woman & sovereign individual in Properia Persona  

[1] CCP170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii) A person aware of the facts might reasonably entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to be impartial.

[2] CCP170.1(a)(6)(B) Bias or prejudice toward a lawyer [litigant] in the proceeding

[3] CCP170.4(b). if a statement of disqualification is untimely filed or if on its face it discloses no legal grounds for disqualification, the trial judge against whom it was filed may order it stricken.

[4] CCP 664 When trial by jury has been had, judgment must be entered by the clerk, in conformity to the verdict ….In no case is a judgment effectual for any purpose until entered.

[5] GC 664.5(b) Promptly upon entry of judgment in a contested action..in which a prevailing party is not represented by counsel, the clerk of the court shall mail notice of entry of judgment to all parties who have appeared in the action..and shall execute a certificate of such mailing and place it in the court’s file in the cause

[6] GC 6200(a)(c) Every officer having the custody of any record.. or of any paper or proceeding of any court, filed or deposited in any public office… is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code for two, three, or four years if, as to the whole or any part of the record,…paper, or proceeding, the officer willfully does or permits any other person to do any of the following: (a)..secrete (c)Alter or falsify

[7] GC 6203(a) Every officer authorized by law to make or give any certificate or other writing is guilty of a misdemeanor if he or she makes and delivers as true any certificate or writing containing statements which he or she knows to be false. 

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

I.

Background

A. Summary of recent events requiring the disqualification of INSTANT JUDGE.

          1. On March 9, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE stated to Petitioner, Sharon Kramer that a litigant in entirely unrelated matters[8][9], who Kramer did not know, Richard Shapiro  was disturbed . He said, NO MATTER WHAT, YOU DON’T WANT TO SPEND A LOT OF TIME WITH MR. SHAPIRO. HE S DISTURBED… “

          2.  INSTANT JUDGE then disturbingly proceeded to sentence Kramer to jail for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury and sign a fraudulent document that was submitted to INSTANT JUDGE on February 10, 2012 by Respondent Bruce KELMAN’s counsel, Keith SCHEUER [10].[11] 

          3. INSTANT JUDGE, KELMAN & SCHEUER were trying to coerce Kramer into apologizing for being framed for libel with actual malice in KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER[12], enjoined by INSTANT JUDGE from writing of it in KELMAN v. KRAMER[13], and its continued adverse impact on Kramer and the public.

          4 While unlawfully incarcerated from March 12 to March 14, 2012, for refusing to be coerced to sign a document on March 9, 2012 stating I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury. and thus unlawfully strip searched; Kramer became ill from being in a communal setting and made to clean the bathrooms used by approximately eighty from a segment of the population known to be at high risk for bacterial, fungal and viral diseases. I.e. tweekers, prostitutes and heroine addicts. She also acquired painful shingles, an illness commonly known to be caused by stress.

          5. On April 27, 2012 she requested that INSTANT JUDGE provide her with payment for medical care[14], as she is now indigent from the courts trying to destroy her to conceal they have been aiding fraud in insurer claims handling practices & toxic torts, nationwide, by what they have been doing to her for seven years of framing her for libel over the first public writing of how it became a fraudulent concept in US public health policy and workers comp policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm  for the purpose of misleading US courts to limit financial liability of building stakeholders. KELMAN, SCHEUER and the courts have done everything possible to try to silence, discredit and destroy Kramer for speaking the truth.

          6. Kramer received no reply or help from INSTANT JUDGE or the Superior Court Clerk, but did receive a taunting email from SCHEUER on May 9, 2012.[15] She is still physically ill, experiencing fear and anguish of what INSTANT JUDGE will do to her next to demean her, and trying to self-treat from lack of funds.

          7.  On April 5, 2012, while ordering the removal of the libelous misdemeanor that was placed on Kramer s Sheriff Department record on March 12, 2012 while she was unlawfully incarcerated by INSTANT JUDGE (and after Kramer made four of five exparte motions, he do so[16] – with a libelous misdemeanor and civil contempt still on her record); INSTANT JUDGE falsified Kramer s Sheriff Department record again[17] to state he had lawfully incarcerated her for civil contempt of court under CCP1218(a). He attached and sent to the Sheriff Department, the January 19, 2012 REVISED CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT AND JUDGMENT as false exhibit that Kramer was incarcerated for violating this order  concealing that INSTANT JUDGE had unlawfully incarcerated Kramer for refusing to be coerced to sign the fraudulent proposed apology for being framed for libel with actual malice that was submitted to INSTANT JUDGE by SCHEUER on February 10, 2012.

          8. In oral argument, April 12, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE refused to remove the libel from Kramer s record. [18]

          9. The March 9, 2012 Transcript (see fn 11) shows Kramer was incarcerated by INSTANT JUDGE for refusing coercion to conceal corruption and ineptitude in the Judicial Branch, State Bar and Commission on Judicial Performance aiding KELMAN with continuance of fraud in insurer claims handing practices and toxic torts, nationwide. She refused to apologize for being framed for libel with actual malice, impacting public health and was sent to jail. From the transcript of March 9, 2012

INSTANT JUDGE:.and at our last hearing [sic, February 10th] I was impressed with what is characterized as a retraction by Sharon Kramer, a very brief two page document, which will be filed with the Court, inviting you to simply say it was not your intention in writing the press release to state or imply that Dr. Kelman committed perjury.  It goes on “I do not believe that Dr. Kelman committed perjury. I apologize to Dr. Kelman and his colleagues at Veritox, Inc. for all statements that I have made that stated or implied otherwise. I sincerely regret any harm or damage that I may have caused.” All that was necessary was for you to agree to that and we wouldn’t be here today. But you chose not to, and that’s your right, certainly your right, but you leave me with absolutely no alternative, and I think you know that: and so therefore, I will be remanding you to custody of the Sheriff for five days.

………………….

MRS. KRAMER: Your Honor, you’re skipping a key point in all of this. I never accused Mr. Kelman of committing perjury. My writing is 100 percent correct. Mr. Scheuer and the Courts made it look like my writing falsely accused him of lying about taking money for the ACOEM mold statement, your Honor. My writing accurately states the money was for the US Chamber of Commerce.

…………………….

MRS. KRAMER: I’ve saved thousands of lives from this paper. I’ll always be proud of this paper you’re going to put me in jail for. It was the catalyst that caused change. Because I have a degree in marketing, I brought it to light how this false concept marketed into policy was harming so many. From there the Wall Street Journal went on to write about it. From there I was able to get a Federal Government Accountability Office Audit that knocked his clients right out of the Federal policy. His client tells in court that it’s scientifically proven these illnesses “Could not be.” So I got a Federal audit and it all started from this paper that you’re going to put me in jail for that has taken seven years of my life to be framed for libel; it’s cost my family everything.  I’ll always be proud of this paper, and I’ll go to jail for it if you want me to, but’ I’m not the one who accused Mr. Kelman of perjury.  Mr. Scheuer made it look that way, and the court wrote I had accused him of lying about being paid for the ACOEM paper, when I didn’t.

INSTANT COURT: You and I both know I don’t want you to go to jail. How many times have I said that and you acknowledged it. But here’s the only question that I’m afraid that we’re left with. Is today convenient?

MRS. KRAMER:  Well we have another problem, your Honor: by law you can’t order me to jail for something that I can’t do.  You’ve got me sentenced to five days in jail for these posts….. the court order says I have to retract these statements from two websites. Both of the website owners submitted declarations to you saying, No, they’re not taking them down

INSTANT COURT:Or you could simply agree to this. [sic sign the fraudulent apology, crafted by Scheuer for being framed for libel with actual malice by the courts as they suppressed the evidence KELMAN committed perjury to establish manufactured theme for malice, while knowing they were aiding a science fraud to continue in toxic torts, nationwide]

……………………….

MRS. KRAMER: It’s not lawful for you to do that.

………………………….. 

MS. KRAMER: I do understand completely, your Honor. You’re asking me to apologize for being framed for libel and spending seven years defending the truth of my words. [the first public writing of how it became a fraudulent concept in public health and workers  comp policy that it was proven moldy buildings do not harm for the purpose of misleading US courts. The science fraud was penned by KELMAN and his business partner, Bryan HARDIN  KELMAN committed perjury to establish a needed theme for Kramer s purported malice while strategically litigating to silence her. All courts suppressed the evidence. INSTANT JUDGE then gagged Kramer from being able to write of what prior courts hand done, knowing full well what he was doing and the impact on the public.]

       10. After willfully and unlawfully ordering Kramer to be incarcerated, causing her bodily harm and emotional trauma for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury; below is the direct evidence[19] of malicious libel on her public record to conceal what INSTANT JUDGE has unlawfully done. Below is the direct evidence of a criminal offense by INSTANT JUDGE under GC 6200(a)(c) & GC 6203(a) to conceal he had a United States citizen incarcerated for refusing to be coerced to commit criminal perjury in a effort to unlawfully shield compromised courts, KELMAN & SCHEUER while forsaking his oath to lawfully protect public health & safety and protect the Constitution of the United States he is sworn to uphold:

          11. In late March 2012 and upon Mr. Richard Shapiro becoming aware that on March 9, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE had said he was disturbed in a case not related to his, and not one with which to associate (and then established INSTANT JUDGE is disturbed by his sentencing a US citizen to jail for refusal to be coerced into criminal perjury); Shapiro submitted a supplement to his Motion to Disqualify INSTANT JUDGE for blatant bias and disrespect for the Constitution in the cases Shapiro has before INSTANT JUDGE.

          12. On May 4, 2012, Kramer submitted a declaration for Shapiro supporting INSTANT JUDGE is indeed biased, is operating outside the law, is a threat to the public and the Constitution, and stating her concerns that INSTANT JUDGE is now a physical threat to Shapiro because of what Shapiro knows of INSTANT JUDGE sentencing Kramer to jail for refusal to commit perjury and then falsifying her Sheriff Department record to conceal the unlawful, libelous, malicious, physically harming and continuing emotionally terrorizing of Kramer by INSTANT JUDGE, KELMAN and SCHEUER.[20]

          13. On April 12, 2012, as added threat of potential reason to tamper with Kramer s now witness, Shapiro; INSTANT JUDGE saw Shapiro witness INSTANT JUDGE state, ‘I understand’ ’I understand’ in reply to Kramer s statement, I am not showing up in your courtroom tomorrow. You do not have jurisdiction.  {see fn 18]

         .14. INSTANT JUDGE knows he is flying without the net of judicial immunity for making rulings and sentencing Kramer to jail for refusal to commit perjury, etc., because he knows he does not have subject matter jurisdiction in KELMAN v. KRAMER.[21]  This makes him an even greater threat of more bodily harm to both Kramer and her witness, Shapiro, should he be able to lay claim over their cases.

          15. On April 24, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE refused to answer Kramer s direct ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question of whether he has jurisdiction[22] with several court watchers in the room  and then proceeded to reschedule a trial date and new contempt of court hearing for the end of June 2012.

          16. Kramer had hoped that in light of recent events, INSTANT JUDGE would have experienced a prophylactic effect [23] and epiphany of understanding the need for him to stop harassing her; acknowledge the evidence he is unlawfully suppressing in his case file of Kramer being framed for libel with actual malice by prior courts with many documents falsified along the way; and dismiss the case of his own accord.

          17. No epiphany to stop conspiring to defraud the public and terrorizing Kramer by abusive and unlawful means seems to have set in for INSTANT JUDGE. On May 17, 2012, Kramer became aware that INSTANT JUDGE submitted a VERIFIED STATEMENT[24] on May 14, 2012 in the Shapiro matters

          18. In his VERIFIED STATEMENT, INSTANT JUDGE continued his wile and flat out lied under oath by stating, ”I know of no facts or circumstances that would require my disqualification or recusal in the caseThis, while knowing he made the biased and disturbed  comment of Shaprio at the same time he sent Kramer to jail for refusing coercion into perjury; that Shapiro witnessed INSTANT JUDGE state I understand  when Kramer said he had no jurisdiction, and that Kramer is concerned for Shapiro because of it.

          19. These facts coupled together with the fact that on April 27, 2012, Kramer witnessed INSTANT JUDGE (again) use the Sheriff Department for stage props before a packed, captive audience as he sets the stage that Shapiro is criminally disturbed; causes reasonable suspicion of future tampering with Shapiro to portray him as not credible of what he knows of INSTANT JUDGE s unlawful and terrorizing behavior in KELMAN v. KRAMER, should INSTANT JUDGE keep jurisdiction of Shapiro s cases. [see fn 17 & 24] .

          20. On May 18, 2012, upon becoming aware of the perjury in INSTANT JUDGE s VERIFIED STATEMENT; Kramer wrote a second declaration[25] on behalf of Shapiro providing the direct evidence that INSTANT JUDGE is a bold faced liar  with statements made of “I know of no facts or circumstances that would require my disqualification or recusal in the case “ This, while falsely inferring he had the Sheriffs in the courtroom on March 9, 2012 because of the Shapiro case, when in reality they were there for the next case to be heard before INSTANT JUDGE to intimidate Kramer into coerced perjury. On May 18th, Kramer again voiced concerns for Shapiro s physical safety, her physical safety, public health & safety, and the Constitution should INSTANT JUDGE be able to tamper with her witness, Shapiro, by keeping jurisdiction of his cases.

          21. As a result of his May 14, 2012 false statements indicating that no epiphany will be occurring anytime soon for INSTANT JUDGE that he is not above the law, on Monday, May 21, 2012, Kramer began  this Motion of the need for INSTANT JUDGE to be disqualified from KELMAN v. KRAMER in accordance with CCP170.4(b),170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii),170.1(a)(6)(B),664,664.5(b),GC 6200(a)(c),6203(a)[See fn 1-7]

          22. In her motion, Kramer could have included “conspiring with plaintiff, plaintiff counsel and all courts to oversee the matter of KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER to defraud the public while trying to conceal mass corruption in the California legal system by being a willing participants in malicious litigations against public participation, carried out by unlawful means for seven years, while holding one captive, physically and psychologically abusing them to conceal it.” as additional reason INSTANT JUDGE needs to be disqualified in KELMAN v. KRAMER under whatever penal codes apply when a judge  with no jurisdiction  is caught conspiring to defraud the public, unlawfully incarcerating US citizens, falsifying public records and giving the appearance of intent to tamper with a witness to have him deemed incompetent and not credible.

         23. INSTANT JUDGE is demonstrating an alarming pattern. Like his attempts to falsely prove Shapiro is disturbed  at the January 6, 2012 Contempt of Court hearing[26]  INSTANT JUDGE displayed dangerous bias toward Kramer and an intent to have Kramer wrongfully found to have committed a misdemeanor so he could “get her downtown to the psychiatric unit” and be deemed disturbed and mentally incompetent — to discredit her and in need of the corrupt public defender advisor her forced on Kramer, Tracey Sang, to obviously then become Kramer s legal (silenced) voice. From the transcript of the January 6, 2012 civil contempt hearing:

INSTANT JUDGE (to Sang): I’m telling you if you have any influence with her [sic Kramer], I would do anything I could to get her examined, if you can by the psychiatric unit downtown. I was prepared to see if I could get that done today and you know people aren t suppose to participate in criminal proceedings if they re incompetent, and her competence, in my mind, is a serious question.

SANG: I too, have given thought to this very issue, your Honor. And Counsel and I were discussing it before this hearing. What I am  as a criminal attorney [sic, double entendre], the mechanisms that I usually use in situations like this is a 1368.

INSTANT JUDGE: 1368. I know it well.

SANG: Its really the only thing that I believe that WE have at our disposal.

INSTANT JUDGE:She s got to be charged with a misdemeanor. I just read this section but I m not so sure that we couldn t at least attempt to get her examined. I ve got the papers. You know if we could doctor up an order and if she would go. I m not going to do that if she says you people are the ones that have competence issues and I ve had a Pro Per client tell me that once and I can’t do anything about that.

……….

INSTANT JUDGE: If you can think of a way to create that defense, I think that would be something that might be interesting. [All who are booked into San Diego County jails are given a criminal record. They claim inability to record incarceration for non-criminal offenses. Emails indicate Sang was aware of this fact On March 12th a misdemeanor went on Kramer s record. On March 13th INSTANT JUDGE had Kramer s clothes sent to Vista indicating he was intending to send her to the psych unit on March 14th]

         24. In late April 2012, Kramer spoke Sang and asked her if she was directed to bring the Penal Code 1368 to INSTANT JUDGE s attention at the Contempt hearing – a requirement for to be put it into play. Defender of the Public. Sang, refused to answer Kramer’s direct “yes” or  “no” question.

         25. On January 6, 2012, Kramer’s instincts told her to appear for the Contempt hearing not in person, but by declaration[27]: Kramer stated her reason of not appearing is person was her fear of bodily harm from INSTANT JUDGE because of all the evidence he is suppressing of INSTANT JUDGE, KELMAN, SCHEUER and the courts to oversee KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER defrauding the public via malicious libel litigations against her. To quote from Kramer’s January 6th appearance at the contempt hearing by declaration:

I am not physically appearing before any judge with unbridled Contempt of Court and incarceration power, who is i.) suppressing the uncontroverted evidence in his case file that all prior courts suppressed the evidence the plaintiff committed perjury in a prior case to establish needed reason for malice, ii.) is suppressing the evidence that the plaintiff s attorney repeatedly suborned the perjury, and iii.) is suppressing the evidence that the prior courts in the prior case, KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, framed me for libel over a writing impacting public health and safety…..This court s Temporary Injunctive Relief Order (TIRO), is precluding me from writing and evidencing the corruption of prior courts by stopping me from writing the exact words for which I was framed for libel in the prior case, “altered his under oath statements” I am fearful for my physical safety that this court will unlawfully incarcerate me, indefinitely, for contempt of court.

          26. Upon becoming aware that INSTANT COURT, Sang, SCHEUER and KELMAN were conspiring at the January 6, 2012 Civil Contempt hearing to give Kramer a criminal record and to have Kramer deemed mentally incompetent to conceal the mass corruption and ineptitude; Kramer had a mental status evaluation of herself performed by Dr. Lorna Schwarz[28] to thwart off this attack. On January 21, 2012, Dr. Schwarz wrote of Kramer:

Previous testing had revealed her to have extremely well developed problem solving skills and it appears that this ability continues. Her thinking was organized. Her judgment was intact. …DIAGNOSIS Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Being aligned and subject to libel 6 [sic, for seven years by courts]

          27. A person knowledgeable of the facts would reasonably conclude that after a long and illustrious career, INSTANT JUDGE has shamefully  allowed himself to become the Poster Child of what happens when the unwritten code of the California legal system, Speak With One Voice “SWOV” , supercedes all Canons of Judicial Ethics, Business & Professions Codes and mandates of state agencies who are to police the system s ethics. As a result, SWOV & INSTANT JUDGE have become an unlawful danger to society, to Kramer, to Shapiro and to the Constitution that officers of California courts are sworn to uphold. The fact that Kramer must put all online to try to protect herself is evident of SWOV bias & harassment.

[8] RICHARD SHAPIRO V. CITY OF CARLSBAD Case No. 37-2010-00060267-CU-CR-NC  T. P. Nugent

 [9] RICHARD SHAPIRO v. JUDY SHAPIRO Case No. 37-2009-00056400-CU-MC-NC Hon. Thomas P. Nugent

[10] February 10, 2012 SCHEUER’s Fraudulent Proposed Apology http://freepdfhosting.com/42577068fb.pdf

[11] March 9, 2012 Transcript from KELMAN v. KRAMER  http://freepdfhosting.com/402c0b63b8.pdf

 12] May 2005 to presentBRUCE KELMAN & GLOBALTOX, INC., v. SHARON KRAMER No.GIN044539, Five superior & six appellate court jurists presiding. See court fraud: http://freepdfhosting.com/99805ff490.pdf

[13] November 2010 to present KELMAN v. KRAMER in violation of CCP 664 & CCP664.5(b). It s sole foundation documents are the 2008 fraudulent judgment document from KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER that was antedated twice; does not reflect that KRAMER prevailed over GLOBALTOX in trial; was not properly noticed under CCP664.5(b); is inconsistent with the December 2008 Abstract of Judgment & January 2009 Lien that awards costing incurred by trial losing party, GLOBALTOX to KELMAN with interest accruing from three weeks before KELMAN s cost were submitted by the same attorney who submitted fraudulent judgment document to INSTANT JUDGE, SCHEUER; was unlawfully accepted in 2009 by the Presiding Justice of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court  to give her jurisdiction for her peers to conceal what she unlawfully had done in the anti-SLAPP Opinion of November 2006 to make the false finding of libel with actual malice – knowing she was aiding science fraud to continue in policy. September 2010 Opinion was falsified to state a judgment that was never entered to conceal they knew they had no jurisdiction and that there was an undisclosed party to the litigation all along, Bryan HARDIN. CCMS & December 2010 Remittitur were then falsified & altered by their clerk to conceal what the justices had done, again knowing they were aiding toxic tort fraud, nationwide. The lower court amended the judgment 10.28.11. It is still not accurate. INSTANT JUDGE knows he does not have subject matter jurisdiction because he knows the foundational documents upon which the entire case is founded are fraudulent under CCP 664, 664.5(b) & GC 6200(a)(c) and 6203(a) and B&P 6068. His CCMS/ROA was falsified on October 21, 2011 in GC 6200(c) violation to state a tentative ruling that was never written regarding his lack of jurisdiction, had been published. INSTANT JUDGE has never been able to state how he has jurisdiction. On April 12, 2012 he answered I understand I understand when Kramer stated he does not. He then proceeded the very next day to set a June 2012 trial date & new contempt hearing with the direct evidence of his unlawful incarceration & falsification of public record in Kramer s legal filing being submitted by SCHEUER as exhibit of Kramer s alleged contempt of court. On April 24, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE refused to answer Kramer’s direct yes or no question if he has jurisdiction.

[14] April 27 Request for Medical Care http://freepdfhosting.com/976a7ad8c6.pdf

[15] May 9, 2012 SCHEUER taunting email http://freepdfhosting.com/3d9ee29180.pdf

[16] April 5, 2012 Four Exparte Request, Demand To Remove Libel  http://freepdfhosting.com/d9a210111d.pdf   

[17] April 5, 2012  Minute Order directing the removal of misdemeanor restating libelous Civil Contempt under CCP1218(a), attaching January 19, 2012 Contempt Order http://freepdfhosting.com/3f9fe215eb.pdf

 18] April 12, 2012 Transcript, JUDGE knows he has no jurisdiction http://freepdfhosting.com/a52191aa44.pdf    

[19] April 5, 2012 Minute Order as sent from Instant Judge to SD Sheriff   http://freepdfhosting.com/072abeb560.pdf

[20] May 4, 2012 Kramer Declaration 4 Shapiro, bias of JUDGE  http://freepdfhosting.com/d767245f01.pdf

[21] October 21, 2011 Motion 2 Nullify, Falsified CCMS & Transcript http://freepdfhosting.com/d07e87d051.pdf

[22] April 24, 2012 Transcript, http://freepdfhosting.com/e6187b801d.pdf

[23] March 9, 2012 Transcript [see fn 18 re: prophylactics ] SCHEUER:”…I am hopeful that a jail experience will have some sort of prophylactic effect.” COURT: “Why do you think I’m doing this because I like it? That’s of course is not my reason.” SCHEUER: “Understood. But my thinking is the earlier she goes, the sooner the prophylactics set in.”

March 14, 2012 Transcript  http://freepdfhosting.com/8413b355a9.pdf   COURT: “…I would really strongly urge that you give every consideration to agreeing to that proposal that counsel made… I’m not saying you have to do that. I’m not. Don’t hear that from me. But you did hear the important thing from me . KRAMER: No, I did not hear the important thing. I didn’t hear an apology that the courts framed me for libel seven years ago and I’m sitting here in handcuffs for speaking a truth about a fraud in policy. If you want to send me back to jail, fine, but I’m not signing an apology for the court doing that. COURT: Okay, that’s not a condition. It was merely a wish. ….It was an expression of my wish. That’s all I was intending. KRAMER. No. What you are asking me to do is collude with the fraud – with the court to defraud the public after seven years. COURT: Right. But I’m not conditioning my decision this morning on that. That’s not a condition. It was merely a wish. KRAMER: This is a crime. You should be ashamed of yourself.

[24] May 14, 2012 Instant Judge Verified Statement in Shapiro http://freepdfhosting.com/ffcc104e66.pdf

[25] May 18, 2012 Second Kramer Declaration 4 Shapiro http://freepdfhosting.com/bfe4e5397c.pdf

[26] January 6, 2012 Contempt hearing, INSTANT JUDGE wants Kramer deemed criminally incompetent & plots to give her a false misdemeanor to be able to do so. http://freepdfhosting.com/fb5ce0b73e.pdf

[27] January 6, 2012 Kramer s Declaration for Contempt hearing. http://freepdfhosting.com/852b40f9da.pdf

[28] January 21, 2012, Dr. L. Schwarz evaluation of Kramerhttp://freepdfhosting.com/310df951b2.pdf

B. The greater issues of KELMAN & courtroom science fraud that SWOV & INSTANT JUDGE aid to continue by unlawful means.

          1. The following uncontroverted evidence is found extensively in INSTANT JUDGE s case file, but is suppressed in all rulings, orders and judgments he has made.

          2. On March 9, 2005, Kramer, who holds a degree in marketing, was the first to publish on the subject of how it became a fraudulent concept in public health policy for the purpose of misleading US courts to deny liability for causation of illness that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm. KELMAN and his company, GlobalTox, Inc., (now known as VERITOX , Inc.) are central figures to the massive scam.[29]

          3. KELMAN & his business partner, Bryan HARDIN are well connected toxicologists with PhDs. In 2001, they applied math extrapolations to data they took from a true researcher s single, high dose, acute exposure, rodent study[30]. They professed their monotoxicity calculations alone proved the lack of causation of illness from multiple toxigenic molds that are often found in water damaged buildings.[31]

          4. The duos’ conclusion from their monotoxicity risk model has never been duplicated and has been discredited many times over as an unscientific nonsequitor for the purpose of misleading courts.[32]

          5. Regardless of science, they were able to get the nonsequitor mass marketed into public health and workers  comp policy and to the courts  and then make their livings off the backs of the sick from their one trick pony science while serving as expert defense witnesses in toxic torts. By it being legitimized by a dysfunctional medical trade association and the US Chamber of Commerce the courts listened to their garbage science .

          6. Thousands of lives have been unnecessarily devastated[33] over the past seven years directly because of it being aided to continue by INSTANT JUDGE s and SWOV courts  unlawful actions of repeatedly rewarding KELMAN s and SCHEUER s perjury to discredit the validity of Kramer s words in the ongoing saga of Bruce Kelman et al., tries to silence, discredit and destroy Sharon Kramer for daring to speak the truth and save lives .          

          7. As INSTANT JUDGE and SWOV courts know, KELMAN states under oath when serving as a well paid professional naysayer and purveyor of doubt in toxic torts that his calculations prove illnesses from moldy buildings, Could not be. The levels at which we see effects is just to great   KELMAN and HARDIN have never seen effects in humans. They are PhDs  not medical doctors. It is science fraud to claim their calculations can be used by themselves to prove anything regarding individuals  human health effects.

           8. As INSTANT JUDGE is aware, SWOV courts involved in KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, know KELMAN s science has been discredited many times over when used to deny causation of illnesses[34].

          9. In May 2005, KELMAN sued Kramer for the phrase in her March 9, 2005 expose , altered his under oath statements , claiming it was a maliciously false accusation of perjury.[35] 

          10. INSTANT JUDGE knows that from 2005 to 2010, all SWOV courts suppressed the evidence that Kramer gave an unimpeached explanation that she chose that phrase to describe KELMAN obfuscating and flip-flopping on a witness stand in Oregon, February 18, 2005, in an unsuccessful attempt to hide the connection of those involved, how they systematically marketed the false science into policy and how it is used in the court to deny liability for causation of illness. KELMAN altered back and forth of the relationship of ACOEM to the US Chamber once forced to discuss the fraudulent marketing scheme in detail in front of the Oregon jury by a prior testimony of his from Arizona being allowed into the Oregon trial.[36] 

          11. INSTANT JUDGE knows that all SWOV courts to oversee the libel litigation of KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER suppressed the evidence that KELMAN committed perjury to establish a fictitious theme of Kramer harboring malice for KELMAN personally, and suppressed the evidence that SCHEUER repeatedly suborned it while knowing they were aiding the fraud to continue.[37][38][39],[40],

          12. INSTANT JUDGE knows the SWOV courts took KELMAN s falsely stated reason for Kramer s purported personal malice (to write of a fraud in policy harming thousands) at face value; never asking it be corroborated even when Kramer begged they do so. They, like INSTANT JUDGE, suppressed Kramer s twenty-two pieces of uncontroverted evidence[41] it was perjury & suborning of perjury by KELMAN and SCHEUER used to meet the second pronto establish libel with actual malice. (not including the video of it)       

          13. The Fourth District Division One Appellate Court  twice,[42][43] made it appear that Kramer had falsely accused KELMAN of getting caught on the Oregon witness stand lying about being paid by a think-tank to author the 2002 mold position statement of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine ACOEM . Kramer made no such accusation. She correctly wrote KELMAN was paid by the think-tank to author the 2003 mold position statement of the US Chamber of Commerce, of which ACOEM s was another version.[44]

          14. INSTANT JUDGE knows his SWOV peers falsely made it appear that Kramer s writing (the first to expose the fraud in policy to mislead courts) was inaccurate to fraudulently establish the first prong required to prove libel — while they suppressed the evidence Kramer gave an unimpeached explanation for the use of the phrase, altered his under oath statements  and that KELMAN committed perjury to establish false theme for malice and meet the second prong of libel.[45]

          15. Beginning on May 2, 2011, INSTANT JUDGE enjoined Kramer[46] from being able to write of what the SWOV courts had done to her and its continued adverse impact on her and the public by enjoining her from writing the sole cause of action words, altered his under oath statements,  under the false pretense she had been lawfully found guilty of libel w/actual malice by SWOV courts. On May 6, 2011, SCHEUER mailed a threat of litigation to a blog owner in Texas not to write of the deceit of himself, KELMAN, INSTANT JUDGE and SWOV courts.         

          16. On May 2, 2011 when INSTANT JUDGE enjoined Kramer, he knew if she could not write the sole cause of action of the prior case she also could not write of the events involving the sole action that caused the SWOV unlawful finding of libel with actual malice; and its continued adverse impact on Kramer and the public because of it.On April 5, 2011 Kramer informed INSTANT JUDGE before he signed the Temporary Injunctive Relief Order on May 2, 2011, he was unlawfully aiding SWOV and would be aiding to continue to harm the public, unlawfully in violation of the Constitution.

          17.  Specifically Kramer wrote on April 5, 2011[47]:

ONE JUDGE issuing an order acknowledging the defendant s irrefutable evidence presented to him of the plaintiff s criminal perjury used to establish false reason for malice while strategically litigating and now trying to conceal crimes by an injunctive relief motion in this judge s court, will forever change the world and the California judicial system for the better.

It is as simple as that to instantly save the lives of many and restore integrity to California s judicial hierarchy that is out of control. To not acknowledge the irrefutable evidence of prior improvidently entered orders, would be aiding with the continuance of billions of dollars of fraud, advantageous to the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce and aiding with the demise of Democracy in the California judicial system.

          18. On July 15, 2011, INSTANT JUDGE indicated it was frivolous  and threatened to sanction Kramer when she asked that SCHEUER be made to corroborate stated reason for malice in the prior defamation case that is the sole foundation for the second defamation case before INSTANT JUDGE.[48]

          19. On September 11, 2011, realizing as of July 15, 2011 their was no question INSTANT JUDGE was an SWOV judge  not an autonomous one – and having nowhere to turn for help, because the Appellate Court justices, including the exChair of the Commission on Judicial Performance and exChair of the Executive Committee of the Judicial Council, have played a major role in the fraudulent SWOV; Kramer sent letters to key Judicial Council members[49] seeking their help to stop the continued harassment. On September 13, 2011, the letters were placed on two websites[50].

          20. On October 5, 2011, instead of help Kramer received a threatening phone call from the Clerk of the Appellate Court that if she pursued legal action for his directly evidenced GC 6200 violations of falsifying the Remittitur and CCMS; the Presiding Appellate Justice would deem Kramer to be a vexatious litigant [51]

           21.On October 12, 2011, instead of help Kramer received a contempt of court complaint from SCHEUER and KELMAN for placing the direct evidence on the Internet of how SWOV is aiding them to defraud the public. Again ignoring the First Amendment, INSTANT JUDGE accepted the complaint as valid.[52]

          22. Kramer also received over $19,000 in sanctions from INSTANT JUDGE  with no jurisdiction – who at no time stated reason verbally or in writing for the sanctions and whose CCMS was falsified to state a tentative was published regarding his lack of jurisdiction and denial of Kramer s motion to Nullify the Void TIRO, when no such tentative ruling was ever written. (See fn 18)

          23. January 6, 2012, the Contempt hearing read between the lines, they wanted the direct evidence of SWOV courts conspiring with KELMAN off of the Interent  or Kramer would go to jail.

          24 On January 19, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE signed the REVISED ORDER FOR CONTEMPT AND JUDGMENT[53]. He ruled that Kramer must remove the evidence from the Internet. This, under the fraudulent pretense because Kramer s September 11, 2011 letters to judicial branch leaders/posts contained the words, altered his under oath statements ; and that Kramer had been legally found guilty of libel for them by SWOV courts and thus, legally enjoined from writing them by INSTANT JUDGE on May 2, 2011,.

          25. On February 10, 2012, Kramer submitted declarations of the website owners to INSTANT JUDGE stating they refused to remove the direct evidence of INSTANT JUDGE, SWOV, KELMAN and SCHEUER continuing to unlawfully harm the public while harassing Kramer.[54][55] At that point, INSTANT JUDGE knew he had no legal grounds to incarcerate Kramer for contempt of a court order with which she could not comply under CCP1218(a) and 1219(a).

          26. On February 10, 2012SCHEUER submitted the fraudulent apology he had crafted for Kramer to sign. On March 9, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE sentenced Kramer to jail for refusing to be coerced into criminal  perjury. On April 5, 2012 INSTANT JUDGE falsified Kramer s Sheriff Department record to conceal what he has done.  

          27. On April 10, 2012 SCHEUER filed a new Contempt of Court Complaint[56]

          28. Among exhibits of evidence[57] of why Kramer should be held in contempt are Kramer s pleadings and the website owners  declarations that are public record court filings providing the direct evidence INSTANT JUDGE unlawfully incarcerated a US citizen for refusing to be coerced into perjury then falsified her court  and Sheriff Departement records to conceal it.

          29. April 24, 2012 Like the Emperor s New Robe INSTANT JUDGE accepted complaint as lawful[58].

          30. Because of the magnitude of the fraud, the positions of those involved and in the fact that Shapiro’s safety is now also at stake, the prophylactic effect on Kramer from INSTANT JUDGE’s proven ability to cause bodily harm, lie under oath and falsify public records when caught in unlawful acts with SWOV courts et al., is that she KNOWS it is imperative INSTANT JUDGE be made to stop his reign of terror over her and his complete lack of respect for the Constitution he is sworn to uphold.

II

What Is At Stake For The Public And Has Been For Seven Years

     1. INSTANT JUDGE, like SWOV Appellate Jurists, knows that if it is acknowledged KELMAN committed perjury while strategically litigating against the first person to publicly write of how KELMAN and others misapply monotoxicity risk models, by themselves, to deny liability for causation of environmental and chemical injury, this science fraud that is used to sell doubt for causation of individuals  illnesses will IMMEDIATELY cease to be able to be used in US courtrooms.

     2. INSTANT JUDGE knows that if it is acknowledged KELMAN committed perjury while strategically litigating against the first person to publicly write of how KELMAN and others misapply monotoxicity risk models, by themselves, to deny liability for causation of environmental and chemical injury, that there are many in the California judicial branch and State Bar who will be exposed for conspiring to defraud the public by unlawful means, by what they have collectively been doing to Kramer for now seven years.

III

Argument

          There is dire need and good cause for INSTANT JUDGE to be disqualified in KELMAN v. KRAMER. Any person, who is aware of the fact that INSTANT JUDGE had Kramer incarcerated for refusing to be coerced into perjury and sign a fraudulent document which states, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury”.  – when the evidence is all over INSTANT JUDGE s files that KELMAN did commit perjury and all SWOV courts suppressed the evidence – and then falsified Kramer s Sheriff Department record in violation of GC 6200(a)(c) and GC 6203(a) to conceal the unlawful misconduct defrauding the public; would entertain reasonable doubt INSTANT JUDGE would be able to be impartial in further dealings with Kramer under CCP170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii).

          INSTANT JUDGE is aware he does not have subject matter jurisdiction under CCP 664 and CCP 664.5(b) because he knows the judgment document submitted to INSTANT JUDGE by SCHEUER from the prior case as the sole foundation for this case is known by INSTANT JUDGE and SWOV to be fraudulent and not consistent with the jury verdict, the abstract of judgment, lien, statements made in the 2010 Appellate Opinion, or the amended judgment and amended CCMS as of October 28, 2011. Like the judgment document from KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, the December 2010 Appellate Court Remittur is also known by INSTANT JUDGE to be fraudulent and in violation of GC6200(a)(c) and GC 6203(a). On April 12, 2012, INSTANT JUDGE stated in open court I understand  when Kramer stated he does not have jurisdiction. On April 24, 2012 he refused to answer the direct yes  or no  question of whether he has jurisdiction.

          Kramer continues to fear for her personal safety from a man who has already unlawfully locked her up, made her ill and then lied to the Sheriff Department about what he had done  not unlike Jeffrey Dahlmer when his victim was not believed, could get no help and could not get free of his abuser. Currently, INSTANT JUDGE is conspiring with KELMAN and SCHEUER to hold a new contempt of court hearing in which the evidence of Kramer s purported contempt is in reality the evidence of INSTANT JUDGE incarcerating Kramer for refusal of coercion into perjury and falsification of her record. This is scheduled in conjunction with a bench trail in June of 2012. Kramer has not been personally served the Order to Show Cause. She is fearful that her abuser will have her jailed when she does not appear for the unlawful trial.

IV

Conclusion

     Thomas Nugent, Bruce Kelman, Keith Scheuer and SWOV are unlawful threats to the Constitution and to the public. There can be no doubt that INSTANT JUDGE could ever be impartial or unbiased when dealing with Kramer while trying to conceal his and others  unlawful misconduct. INSTANT JUDGE must be disqualified from KELMAN v. KRAMER. He has become a threat to her personal safety for daring to speak the truth of a fraud in public health policy that was aided to continue by his unlawful actions and the actions of his peers. All involved should be investigated for conspiring to defraud the public, not as mere exercise or vindication, but to save many lives in the future and to remove the dishonorable from California s legal system and judicial branch.

 

May 24, 2012                                                                                                                          Sharon Kramer, In Properia Persona

[29] March 9, 2005 Kramer’s writing exposing the fraud of mold issue http://freepdfhosting.com/1e8b814e86.pdf

[30] October 21, 2002 ACOEM legitimizing the science fraud http://freepdfhosting.com/74478c4cad.pdf

July 2006 anti-SLAPP App Ct knew it is fraud (see pdf pg 3) http://freepdfhosting.com/dc748c7054.pdf  

[31] July 2003 US Chamber furthers KELMAN s & HARDIN s http://freepdfhosting.com/a8baea5e37.pdf   garbage science  that ACOEM legitimized in 2002 http://freepdfhosting.com/bb400631a3.pdf  

[32] January 9, 2007 WSJ expose  on KELMAN, HARDIN, ACOEM, garbage science and the courtroom http://www.drcraner.com/images/suits_over_mold_WSJ.pdf

[33] September 2008 GAO Audit, 2010 WHO Report, 2007 Berekely Labs Report, 2010 Surviving Mold Book

[34] January 2010 Appellate Jurists know Kelman s science is garbage http://freepdfhosting.com/bb0e5c38e9.pdf 

[35] May 2005 Original complaint http://freepdfhosting.com/8c13f498d7.pdf

[36] September 30, 2010 Excerpt Petition for Rehearing http://freepdfhosting.com/a6aa4ee318.pdf

[37] July 2002, KELMAN was retained as an expert defense toxicologist in Kramer s mold litigation with her insurer, the remediator and lab of long ago concerning a botched remedation. (2002-2003), Mercury Casualty Insurer v. Michael Kramer et.al. North San Diego County Superior Court, Hon. Michael Orfield presiding. Mercury sued the Kramer family for not accepting $30K. Kramers countersued. Kramer s eldest daughter was born with Cystic Fibrosis. The Kramer family made no claims of toxic illness or acquiring life threatening illnesses . In July of 2002, KELMAN wrote to Mercury s attorney, that a physician with detailed knowledge of the child must be consulted to determine the safety of the home. INSTANT COURT & SWOV suppressed this evidence: http://freepdfhosting.com/4fffd38808.pdf   & http://freepdfhosting.com/aca23df2d4.pdf

[38]In December 2003, the Kramer’s received nearly a half a million dollars in settlement from the cross complainants in Mercury. Judge Michael B. Orfield oversaw the entire case & signed the three settlement agreements. In 2005, when overseeing KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, Judge Orfield (who retired right before trial) was the first judge to suppress the evidence KELMAN committed perjury to establish false theme for malice, claiming to have given a malice causing testimony in Mercury that KELMAN never even gave. Judge Orfield suppressed the evidence of KELMAN s perjury and SCHEUER s suborning of it again when denying Kramer s Motion for Summary Judgment in 2008 as did the Appellate Court in the 2006 anti-SLAPP.

[39] Between 2005 & 2008, in KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER, KELMAN falsely wrote three times in declarations to establish needed theme for malice, lying of his role in Mercury, KELMAN falsely wrote, “I testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life threatening illnesses she [sic Kramer] claimed.”

[40] SCHEUER, who there is case law established because of his antics of character assassinating the opposition to gain advantage, falsely wrote in his briefs to establish fictitious theme for Kramer s malice (2005 to 2010), “Dr. Kelman testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life threatening illnesses she claimed. Apparently furious that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled home, Kramer launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputation of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox “ Roston v. Edwards (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 842 [179 Cal.Rptr. 830] Defendants, in their zeal to present a portrait of plaintiff Roston…that would enhance their position, made reference to a multitude of cases which were inappropriate for consideration.The presentation of such matter, if designedly done, is certainly to be discouraged. One might mistake it for an attempt to inflame the court against a party to the action. Inflamming atty,SCHEUER. INSTANT JUDGE knows there was ZERO evidence Kramer had malice for KELMAN because of the Mercury case. INSTANT JUDGE knows there was much evidence KELMAN committed perjury and SCHEUER suborned it to establish false portrait of Kramer having personal malice.

[41] 22 Pieces of Evidence are in INSTANT JUDGE s File of his peers suppressing evidence of KELMAN s perjury and SCHEUER s suborning to establish malice. They are Bate Stamped for App.Ct. 3 from attys and a scientist who was not permitted to testify in trial: http://freepdfhosting.com/f5eaf8f057.pdf   

[42] Fraud, 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion. “This testimony supports a conclusion Kelman did not deny he had been paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a paper, but only denied being paid by the Manhattan Institute to make revisions in the paper issued by ACOEM. He admitted being paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a lay translation. The fact that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from the poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt to deny payment. In sum, Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient evidence to satisfy a prima facie showing that the statement in the press release was false.  

[43] SWOV CYAing in September 2010 “Case Review” Appellate OpinionIn a prior opinion, a previous panel of this court affirmed an order denying Kramer s motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute.  In doing so, we largely resolved the issues Kramer now raises on appeal. In our prior opinion, we found sufficient evidence Kramer s Internet post was false and defamatory as well as sufficient evidence the post was published with constitutional malice. 

[44] Kramer’s March 25 accurate writing: Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne s attorney of Kelman s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.  He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure &..In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries  associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[45]  January 6, 2012 The above evidence is found in Kramer’s appearance by affidavit for INSTANT JUDGE s Contempt of Court hearing and as a reason she feared bodily harm from INSTANT JUDGE for his suppressing this and the evidence of SWOV courts concealed KELMAN s perjury to establish malice while aiding fraud to continue in policy and US courts: http://freepdfhosting.com/852b40f9da.pdf  

[46] May 6, 2011 SCHEUER mailed INSTANT JUDGE’s May 2, 2011 TIRO gagging Kramer from writing of SWOV fraud, to a blog owner in Texas to threaten her with litigation if she wrote of the matter. Also attached the fraudulent 2008 Judgment from KELMAN & GLOBALTOX v. KRAMER. http://freepdfhosting.com/8ef97038b9.pdf

[47] April 5, 2011 Kramer told INSTANT JUDGE he was defrauding public & shielding SWOV if he gagged her. http://freepdfhosting.com/736fe820eb.pdf  

[48] July 14, 2011 INSTANT JUDGE stating frivolous  SCHEUER be made to produce corroborating evidence of stated reason for malice in a defamation case while misstating facts  http://freepdfhosting.com/0ff6bd09c7.pdf

[50] September 13, 2011, Letters as posted on Internet http://wp.me/plYPz-3aV

[51] October 5, 2011, Kramer’s follow up fax to Kelly regarding his threat: http://freepdfhosting.com/7bffe13cb0.pdf 

[52] October 12, 2011 SCHEUER Complaint w/letters as exhibit:  

[53] January 19, 2012  Order & Judgment For Contempt http://freepdfhosting.com/7e3d770de9.pdf

[54] February 10, 2012 Kramer s Notice of Inability to Comply http://freepdfhosting.com/5002768ab6.pdf

[55] February 10, 2012 Declarations of Carstens & Stuckey, http://freepdfhosting.com/edfc066cb4.pdf

[56] April 10, 2012 Scheuer s Newest Complaint for Contempt http://freepdfhosting.com/d25bac26e7.pdf 

[57] April 10, 2012 Complaint Exhibits are evidence of JUDGE’s crime  http://freepdfhosting.com/83abfb3864.pdf 

[58] April 24, 2012 Transcript  http://freepdfhosting.com/d6d94f411f.pdf  

This document may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me Short link: http://wp.me/p20mAH-hu

End of May 30, 2012 Post

********************************************************************************

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Kelman v. Kramer MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THOMAS P. NUGENT “INSTANT JUDGE”

  1. “Instant Judge” belongs in a fast food joint flipping hamburgers. He can falsely accuse the hamburgers of being tacos all he wants, and no one gets hurt.

  2. OMG, It sounds to me like they ARE TRYING to kill her. to know that this hurrassment is already affecting her health than to put her in jail, in that filthy place when they know she has already been though a water damaged home exposure, is insane.
    someone needs to do something, this lady has been through more than most people could bare. they are makeing her ill and risking her life by putting her in such a filthy place. I pray for you Sharon, and God help us all when Judges are allowed to harm people like this and no one is doing nothing about it.
    GOD, HELP US!
    is this what people get these days for standing up for truth and justice? criminals and killers run free while the courts are busy playing games with someones life because they dared to speak the truth about how water damaged buildings really do make people ill, and show the proof of how that has been denied for many years for the sake of money? because they dared to speak out about something most people are already very aware of, that money is being put above the lives and health of the people who’s fathers and grandfarthers fought for this country and our freedom.
    WAKE UP PEOPLE OUT THERE !

  3. Reblogged this on Katy's Exposure and commented:

    Add your thoughts here… (optional)Sharon Kramer was ordered to be jailed by Judge Thomas Nugent on March 9th for refusing to be coerced to defraud public. On April 5th, he falsified the sheriff department record to conceal what he had done. On June 8th, he going to do it again with the evidence of what he did being the alleged evidence that Kramer is in contempt of court for letting it be known that the court is colluding with Kelman & Scheuer to defraud the public and trying everything possible to silence Kramer. SHE FEARS FOR HER SAFETY.

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s