“There is nothing frivolous about California judiciaries working in concert to suppress direct evidence of perjury and suborning of perjury while knowing their. actions are abetting massive hate crimes against the environmentally disabled and dying in a scheme for insurers to shift their financial responsibility for the illnesses onto taxpayers; and with court clerks falsifying legal documents to conceal the judiciaries’ roles in aiding it to continue as all legal system policing agencies turn a blind eye to the mass corruption of the California courts in deliberate indifference. As a United States citizen I have a right and a duty to say this and to provide the public with the irrefutable evidence that it is true. Yet, I was jailed and harmed in March of 2012 for exposing this corruption in California courts aiding the insurer fraud and hate crimes of epic proportion. I have now been court ordered to publish on the internet that this is not true, to pay the courts for exposing their fraud and to never write of the matter again or face more incarceration. It is all true and I can prove it — and no intimidation tactic will ever coerce me into silence. Too many lives and the Constitution are at stake.” Sharon Noonan Kramer
Appellate Court Kelman v. Kramer NOTICE OF APPEAL (in pdf)
“TO ALL DISCLOSED AND UNDISCLOSED PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Sharon “Kramer”, hereby appeals from the order denying her “MOTION TO VACATE VOID CORAM NON JUDICE ‘JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION’ in Criminal Violation of C.C.P 1209(b)” pursuant to Codes of Civil Procedures 1209(b), 337.5(b), 391(b), 657.1, 657.4, 657.6, 657.7, 664, 664.5(b); Government Codes 6200(a)(c) and 6203(a)(b); Business and Professions Codes 6068(c)(d)(f)(g); and Penal Codes 422.55(a)(1)(7), 422.55(b), 422.6(a). Notice of August 31, 2012 MINUTE ORDER on said motion in this case, “Kelman v. Kramer”, was mailed to Kramer from the Court on September 4, 2012.
Dated: September 28, 2012 Sharon Kramer, Appellant
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (in pdf w/working links)
Please take notice of the following attached evidence:
1.) that on October 5, 2011, the Clerk of the Fourth District Division One “Appellate Court”, Stephen “Kelly”, called Sharon “Kramer” on the telephone and threatened her that Presiding Justice of the Appellate Court, Justice Judith McConnell, would deem Kramer to be a vexatious litigant should Kramer pursue legal action for Kelly’s provable falsification of the December 20, 2010 Remittitur under the seal of the State of California and provable alteration of the electronic case record “CCMS” to match the falsified Remittitur of the foundational case to this case, Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc., v. Sharon Kramer, (“Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer”) Appellate Case No. D054496. (Attached hereto as Exhibit  [1a] is Kramer’s follow up fax of October 5, 2011 to the October 5, 2011 telephoned threat to Kramer from Kelly, who is also California Judicial Council member and Administration of the Office of the Courts employee.)
This falsification of court records is central to the continuance of malicious litigation against Kramer by the plaintiff(s) and officers of the court, with no subject matter jurisdiction. Contrary to Kelly’s threat, under California Code of Civil Procedure 391(b) Kramer is not a vexatious litigant. She has not filed multiple lawsuits, nor did she initiate this lawsuit or the suit upon which this suit is founded via the evidence of falsified legal documents being suppressed by the courts. The motions she has filed in her defense are not frivolous or vexatious in an attempt to stop harassment of her. Kramer has a right, without fear of retaliation from the courts and denial of her Constitutional rights, to appeal unlawful clerk, plaintiff and officer of the court actions.
2.) that many of these unlawful actions have been carried out, coram non judice, because the entire case of Kelman v. Kramer is founded upon falsified court documents, i.e., judgment and remittitur from the prior case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer. (Attached hereto as Exhibit  is Department 28, North San Diego Superior Court amending the judgment on October 28, 2011, in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer – one year after the case of Kelman v. Kramer was initiated by Bruce “KELMAN” and his attorney Keith “Scheuer” – which is founded solely on the void judgment of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer.)
3.) that the amendment to the judgment is also one year after the Appellate Court falsely stated in their September 2010 Opinion that a judgment had been entered in Kramer’s favor and she was awarded costs; then refused to recall and rescind the fraudulent and void remittitur to correct the void judgment on record. (Attached hereto as Exhibit  is page one of the fraudulent Appellate Opinion and refusal to recall and rescind the falsified remittitur).
4.) that even with the lower court amendment in 2011 after the erred Opinion of the Appellate Court in 2010 and refusal to correct legal error; the judgment on record in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer continues to be void to be used for any purpose under C.C.P. 664 (as it was when this Court accepted jurisdiction, January 2009). It was ante-dated twice aiding the case Abstract of Judgment dated December 30, 2008 and the Lien of January 19, 2008, recorded by California licensed attorney, Scheuer, against Kramer’s property to award Scheuer’s commingled, interest accruing costs incurred by his trial loser client, GLOBALTOX, to Bruce KELMAN, with interest accruing from three months, September 24, 2008, before they are stated as awarded on the void judgment, December 18, 2008; and three weeks before the commingled costs were even submitted by Scheuer and his client, KELMAN, on October 16, 2008. (Attached hereto as Exhibit  is the Abstract & Lien obtained by attorney Scheuer stating interest accruing costs were awarded to Kelman on September 24, 2008 – not December 18, 2008 as stated on the known void judgment – and stating interest accruing costs were awarded three weeks before they were even submitted on October 16, 2008.)
As the Appellate Court is well aware, the fraudulent judgment from Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, is the sole foundational legal document to the case of Kelman v. Kramer as submitted by the same attorney, Scheuer, on November 4, 2010; with the entire purpose of the second case to permanently enjoin Kramer from exposing the officers of the court’s and their clerks’ misconduct in the first case used to force a false finding of libel with actual malice, thereby willfully discrediting the validity of Kramer’s accurate writing over a matter impacting public health, insurer claims handling practices and toxic torts nationwide. (Attached hereto as Exhibit , is the fraudulent judgment of the first case as submitted falsely under penalty of perjury by Scheuer and KELMAN as true and accurate, as the foundational legal document for the second case, November 4, 2010)
September 28, 2012 Sharon Kramer
DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER, UNDER DURESS (in pdf w/working links)
The courts, KELMAN and Scheuer have been harassing me for now seven years for daring to speak the truth in America when it is adverse to the interest of big business. They framed me for libel with actual malice in the first case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer , over the first public writing, mine in March 2005 , of how it became a fraud in policy that it was scientifically proven by Bruce KELMAN and undisclosed party to the litigation, Bryan “HARDIN”, that moldy buildings do not harm. As this Court is well aware, the duo’s simple twist of never vetted exposure science is the foundation for an epic fraud perpetrated on the United States public on behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce and used to sell doubt of causation of environmental illness, disability and death. It is a bonifide hate crime for profit. As this Court is well aware, their science has been deemed not current accepted science to be used as proof to deny liability causation of individuals’ illnesses and disabilities. Never the less, the courts have willfully aided it to continue and have tried every trick in the book to silence and discredit Kramer.
This Court suppressed the evidence that Mr. Kelman committed perjury to establish false theme for malice and suppressed the evidence that Mr. Scheuer repeatedly suborned it in both their 2006 and 2010 appellate opinions – while knowing their unlawful actions were aiding the science fraud to continue in many U.S. courts and insurer claims handling practices adverse to public interest.
In this second case, the courts have tried by hook or by crook in relentless character assassination, intimidation tactics and even bodily harm that would do the Mafia proud, to stop me from writing of what they did in the first case that has aided the continuance of insurance fraud and hate crimes against the environmentally disabled, by trying to permanently enjoining me from writing the words for which I was framed. If I cannot write those words, the courts know that I also cannot write of how and why the courts did it and the continued adverse impact on me, my family, the environmentally disabled, the taxpayer and the Constitution because of it.
The situation has now deteriorated to the point that I have been ordered by a court with no subject matter jurisdiction (because the foundational document to the case is known to be fraudulent) to commit perjury on the internet and publish a false confession of being guilty of libel for a sentence I never even wrote, “Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ while he testified as a witness in an Oregon lawsuit,”; and to never write of the matter again.
This unlawful enjoinment is for the purpose of concealing the courts, including this court, framed me for libel with actual malice over the sentences, “Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand. He admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of ‘toxic mold’ exposure”. (for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce);   as they suppressed the evidence that KELMAN committed perjury to establish libel law required reason for malice and suppressed the evidence that Scheuer repeatedly suborned the perjury. The continued adverse impact on me, my family, the environmentally disabled, the taxpayer and the discouragement of citizens to speak the truth in America without fear of retaliation when the speech is adverse to illicit interests of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce and affiliates, has been horrendous. Plainly stated, it is billions in insurer fraud aided to continue by the unlawful and unethical actions of this and other courts.
Presiding Justice McConnell falsely deeming me to be a vexatious litigant at this juncture and as threatened by her clerk she would do; would be further abuse in an attempt to conceal officer of the court misconduct by making it impossible for me to file pleadings without first posting a $25,000.00 bond. I no longer have $25,000.00 directly because of the misconduct of the plaintiffs, clerks and officers of the courts, including Justice McConnell, working in concert to defraud the public by character assassination and retaliation – and is exactly why I need to file pleadings to stop the continued damage to myself, my family and the American public resultant from the courts practicing politics from their benches – not law.
This NOTICE OF APPEAL, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE & DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER UNDER DURESS may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.Me http://wp.me/p20mAH-kE, under the blog title of “San Diego Appellate Court ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL & REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE” with working links to court documents in lawful accordance with C.C.P.1209(b) which states,
“A speech or publication reflecting upon or concerning a court or an officer thereof shall not be treated or punished as a contempt of the court unless made in the immediate presence of the court while in session and in such a manner as to actually interfere with its proceedings.”
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and executed by me this 28th day of September, 2012. Sharon Kramer”
Superior Court, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Department 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO VACATE VOID JUDGMENT OF SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 LAST AMENDED OCTOBER 28, 2011 (in pdf w/working links)
“As merely one example of the relentless harassment of KRAMER, in January of 2012 KRAMER was found in contempt of court by DEPT 30 for placing the letters she sent to the Judicial Council in September of 2011 outlining the fraud in K & G v. K and exactly how she was framed for libel for the words, “altered his under oath statements” on the internet in the post titled “Is The California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…..And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?” 
DEPT 30 held Kramer in contempt  and attempted to falsely deem her a mentally incompetent criminal for these letters being on the internet.  When she then posted on the internet the latest of what DEPT 30, KELMAN and SCHEUER were doing that was harassing her to defraud the public and why they were doing it; DEPT 30 found her in contempt again, July 2, 2012, for the evidence being on the net, sanctioned her and permanently enjoined her from ever writing of it again, coram non judice. (The silencing of Kramer will not be happening any time soon)
One day after the July 2nd unlawful judgment, order and permanent injunction was signed in DEPT 30, on July 3, 2012 This Court sent a letter to the Judicial Council  also voicing concerns of abuse of tax dollars via CCMS and ramifications of loss of autonomy within the CA judicial branch. But This Court and none of the other approximately 400 judges who also voiced concern similar to KRAMER’s were sent to jail; caused bodily harm; caused emotional distress; fined $30K; or deemed criminally malicious and mentally incompetent liars or ordered never to write of the matter again. (Sidebar: It would be a strong bet that the Judicial Council, AOC and CJP would liked to have done all of the above to these judges who are exposing waste and ineptitude of CA judicial branch and AOC)”
September 20, 2012 Sharon Kramer
“The August 31, 2012 Minute Order fining Kramer for putting the evidence on the Internet that the JUDGEMENT AND ORDER FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION and Many rulings, judgments, fines, sanctions, etc., are not only unlawful and void, they are disgustingly criminal when it is known to This Court how many lives are continuing to be harmed and some even lost because of it; and it is an attempt by This Court, corum non judice, to stop the mass corruption in the California judicial branch from coming to public light via the internet. When the courts are so severely compromised from the top down, public light is the only hope citizens have to obtain justice. In lawful accordance with C.C.P.1209(b) and the Constitution of the United States, Kramer will continue to lawfully post the evidence on the internet of the weapon of mass destruction for the Constitution of the United States that the California judicial branch has become; including the words for which she was framed for libel “altered his under oath statements”, while the courts suppressed the evidence Kelman commit perjury to establish malice and Scheuer repeatedly suborned it – until someone does something about the corrupt courts of California. The Judgment and Order for Civil Contempt and Permanent Injunction must be vacated. It is void. It is issued coram non judice. It is C-R-I-M-I-N-A-L. And This Court is fully expected to suppress the evidence again that proves it while many stand by in deliberate indifference while lives continue to be devastated daily.
September 9, 2012 Sharon Kramer”
Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive, California courts!