1 Yr Ago Today My Final Day Jailed, The Court Tried To Coerce Me Into Crime Again

Dear All,
**********
Again, thank you for the kind comments I have received in the past two days. The following one by a retired California judge particularly lifted my spirits as this nightmare of dealing with the corrupt California courts continues; and while I am forced to watch in horror as lives continue to be devastated all across the US from it.
***********
“[redated] So after having time to reflect on your situation: You are correct. Your fight is on EVERYONE’s behalf…and for that, I sincerely thank you. I applaud your willingness to take one (or two or five! for that matter)  for the “team”.  Not everyone can say that they are willing to walk the walk..but you can. [redacted] Like you, I hope to never lose my belief that one person can make a difference. Godspeed to you Sharon on this worthy cause.”
**********
This 3rd and final day of incarceration requires a little background to explain. By now, people should be asking themselves, “If this woman is lying about all the perjury, falsified court documents, relentless terrorizing, harassment and the courts colluding with the corporation of Veritox, Inc. (GlobalTox) and their attorney, Keith Scheuer, to try to silence her of how they have been defrauding the public over the mold issue — then why in eight years time have they only sued her for five words, ‘altered his under oath statements’?  And why would she fight so hard, even going to the brink of poverty and going to jail, to prove those words are true? Eight years of litigation against her over those five words only, that the courts themselves acknowledge are true?” C’mon!
******
From my March 2005 writing: ”Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.”

********
From Justice Judith McConnell’s 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion stating the above sentence within the writing is correct while stating a falsehood had been proven: The fact that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition  [sic, bench trial] testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from the poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt to deny payment. In sum, Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient evidence to satisfy a prima facie showing that the statement in the press release was false.”
*********
And why, in the second case has she been permanently enjoined from “republishing” a sentence she never published, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ when he testified in an Oregon lawsuit.”? Why have others been threatened by Scheuer and Kelman not to “republish” that sentence that is not even in the 2005 writing in question?
*********
Answer: They couldn’t gag me from writing the allegedly libelous sentence in my writing when Justice McConnell interpreted Kelman’s testimony in question exactly how I had written it. They desperately want us to quit blogging of the collusion to defraud and have been trying to intimidate people into silence. There is no question that Bruce Kelman “altered his under oath statements” and as such, no question I am not guilty of libel.
***********
So…between March 12 and March 14, 2012, in the matter of Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer, Case No. 37-2010-00061530 CU-DF-NC, I was jailed by the San Diego courts for refusing to be coerced into signing a false confession of being guilty of libel, under penalty of perjury. This means, the court sent me to jail for refusing to commit a crime to conceal that officiers of the courts, the plaintiffs and their attorney are the criminals.
**********
It was done under the false premise that the jailing was for my violating the Civil Contempt of Court Order of January 19, 2012.  Judge Nugent had ordered that Internet posts showing who all in the judicial branch knows of the framing, falsified court docs, adverse impact on the public, etc; be removed from the Internet. Those who the posts show know of the collusion to defraud include the Chief Justice of California, several members of the Judicial Council, including Justice Huffman who did the CYA for McConnell in the 2010 Appellate Opinion, and McConnell herself.
**********
Web site owners submitted affidavits in February 2012 saying they would not remove the truthful posts. So at that point, I could not have complied with the unlawful Civil Contempt Order even if I wanted to. As a result under C.C.P.1219(a), the court could not find me in contempt and jail me for refusing to do something I could not do.
********
I was not jailed for Civil Contempt of Court.  I was jailed for refusing to be coerced into the crime of perjury and sign a false confession crafted by Scheuer, “Retraction of Sharon Kramer”, to aid the officers of courts and plaintiffs to continue to defraud the public (and stay out of jail, themselves).
**********
Civil contempt is not a crime.  Yet somehow while I was incarcerated, my alleged civil contempt morphed into criminal contempt under Penal Code 166 and a false misdemeanor was placed on my record. Why?
*********
Because they needed it to appear I committed a crime before they could get me “to the psychiatric unit downtown” under Penal Code 1368 and deem me a mentally incompetent criminal who need representation assigned by the court. (aka, someone to say I am a mentally incompetent, criminal liar “on my behalf” for exposing mass scientific fraud aided to continue by the courts.)
*********
Below, is from the January 6, 2012 Civil Contempt hearing which I did not attend. The court was trying to force criminal public defender (double entedre), Tracey Sang, on me.  I refused to take her as counsel. This is a civil matter. The courts pretended she was my counsel anyway at the unlawful contempt hearing.
*******
In order for Penal Code 1368 to take effect and deem someone incompetent to represent themselves they must first be charged with a crime and their counsel must first recommend psychiatric evaluation to the judge. (please read the Penal Code 1368 link to understand just how diabolical the following really is!)
*********

January 6, 2012, Civil Contempt Hearing

JUDGE NUGENT to TRACEY SANG: I’M TELLING YOU IF YOU HAVE ANY INFLUENCE WITH HER, I WOULD DO ANYTHING I COULD TO GET HER EXAMINED, IF I CAN, BY THE PSYCHIATRIC UNIT DOWNTOWN. I WAS PREPARED TO SEE IF I COULD GET THAT DONE TODAY. AND, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE AREN’T SUPPOSED TO PARTICIPATE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IF THEY’RE INCOMPETENT, AND HER COMPETENCE, IN MY MIND, IS A SERIOUS QUESTION.

MS. SANG: I, TOO, HAVE GIVEN THOUGHT TO THIS VERY ISSUE, YOUR HONOR. AND COUNSEL [Keith Scheuer] AND I WERE DISCUSSING IT BEFORE THIS HEARING. WHAT I AM — AS A CRIMINAL ATTORNEY, THE MECHANISMS THAT I USUALLY USE IN SITUATIONS LIKE THIS IS A 1368.

THE COURT: 1368. I KNOW IT WELL.

MS. SANG: IT’S REALLY THE ONLY THING THAT I BELIEVE WE HAVE AT OUR DISPOSAL. (who is “WE”???)

THE COURT: SHE’S GOT TO BE CHARGED WITH A MISDEMEANOR (sic, this is Civil Contempt of Court). I JUST READ THE SECTION. BUT I’M NOT SO SURE THAT WE COULDN’T AT LEAST ATTEMPT TO GET HER EXAMINED. I’VE GOT THE PAPERS. YOU KNOW, IF WE COULD DOCTOR UP AN ORDER AND IF SHE WOULD GO, I’M NOT GOING TO DO THAT IF SHE SAYS YOU PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE THE COMPETENCE ISSUE, AND I’VE HAD A PRO PER CLIENT TELL ME THAT ONCE. AND I CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. I RESPECT HER AND I RESPECT HER RIGHTS IN EVERY WAY. I JUST HATE TO SEE HER GOING IN THE DIRECTION SHE’S GOING IN WHEN THERE’S SUCH AN EASY ANSWER FOR HER. YOU KNOW, MIGHT BE A LOT OF WAYS TO VOICE HER OPINIONS ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS WITHOUT REPEATING THE DEFAMATORY LANGUAGE THAT HAS BEEN ORDERED WRONG, DON’T DO IT ANYMORE. IT WOULD BE SO EASY, BUT YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW YOU’VE DEALT WITH IT ENOUGH TO KNOW THE PROBLEM. BUT YOU TELL ME. DO YOU THINK SHE WOULD BE WILLING TO BE EXAMINED?

MS. SANG: I CERTAINLY COULDN’T GIVE AN OPINION. MY GUESS WOULD BE NO.

THE COURT: THAT’S MY GUESS, TOO. OKAY. WELL, IT’S OUT THERE.

MS. SANG: NONETHELESS, IT IS CERTAINLY WITHIN THE COURT’S POWER TO ORDER IT. AND –

************
So…..On the morning of March 14, 2012, the jail guards came in and awoke me and my new Homies. Names were called out of those who were going somewhere – either to be released or had hearings scheduled. They called my name. I had no idea why. I was supposed to be learning tricks of illicit trades, playing hop scotch with prostitutes and listening to interesting stories of wayward women for five nights – not two.
************
Those who were to be released from custody were given their clothes. Even when there are hearings, inmates are returned to the jail and given their clothes there, for release of custody. They said my clothes had been sent to the Vista courthouse the day before. Did that mean I was not going to be released from custody but was going somewhere else from the Vista courthouse?
************
I was then shackled to a drug addict (not of Homie caliber) for a one hour bus ride in the dark from the jail to the courthouse. (I think they must chain people together so it would be harder to run if so inclined). I was put in this little room with windows to other little rooms in the bowels of the courthouse. I watched three young women chop up and snort something in the next room. They seemed extremely happy after they did it.
************
A sheriff came and got me.  I was taken through a maze of corridors that I never knew existed in the Vista courthouse.  I was delivered to Judge Nugent’s courtroom in prison garb, chains, no make up, unbrushed hair and very little sleep for two nights.  Although most of the women were very nice in jail, there were a few that caused me to sleep with one eye opened. One of the nice prostitutes was groped in her sleep by an extremely odd duck, on my first night in jail. 
***********
As I entered the courtroom the first smiling face I saw was criminal public defender,Tracey Sang’s, sitting at the defense table like she was my legal counsel.  I made her get up and move to the audience. Keith Scheuer was there. Judge Nugent had invited him to be there as a “courtesy” he claimed.  My husband, 91 year old mother and a sister were also there. No one had notified them. My husband had seen on the Internet that there was a hearing scheduled. 
***********
It does not make sense that Judge Nugent had Scheuer there, had Sang there at the defense table and had my clothes sent to the Vista courthouse – unless I was going somewhere else and the collusive hands of the trio. If the intent was just to release me from custody, my clothes would have remained at the jail like all the other women who had hearings and would be returned to jail for release. 
**********
Circumstances would indicate that they were intending to send me to the “psychiatric unit downtown” with Sang then becoming my forced counsel/silenced voice. I think Judge Nugent chickened out on the criminally mentally incompetent angle. By now, he had to be realizing what a compromised position his judicial peers had put him in and that I was not going to shut up no matter what he did. Plus, several people sent emails to the White House while I was in jail asking they intercede. “PLEASE send mass emails to OBAMA!” 
*******
On March 14th, Judge Nugent flat out lied and specifically stated I would be returned to the jail to be released — when he had ordered that my clothes be sent to the Vista courthouse. He  tried to coerce me one more time into signing the false confession. I refused, stated I would not defraud the public, and that this was a crime. Judge Nugent said “Right” it was just a wish that I would. I was then released directly from the courthouse, not the jail.
************
THE COURT: WE ALL KNOW I CALLED THIS MEETING FOR US BECAUSE OF THE DECISION THAT I MADE, AS I REFLECTED ON ALL OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THIS CASE, THAT YOU SHOULD BE RELEASED AT THIS TIME, AND THAT WILL BE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT. I INVITED COUNSEL TO BE HERE OUT OF COURTESY. THIS IS ULTIMATELY MY CALL AND THAT IS MY CALL.[as if it might be somebody else’s?] AND, HOPEFULLY, YOU’LL BE RELEASED FORTHWITH. I KNOW YOU’LL BE TAKEN BACK TO WHERE YOU JUST CAME FROM, AND I UNDERSTAND THE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE THAT YOU’LL BE RELEASED AT THAT TIME.[really? then why did you have my clothes sent to Vista?]
 
IT SEEMED TO ME IN OUR LAST MEETING I RECALLED YOU EVEN SAID THAT IT WASN’T YOU WHO HAD ACCUSED THE GENTLEMAN OF PERJURY OR OF ALTERING HIS TESTIMONY, IT WAS RATHER COUNSEL’S EFFORTS TO TRY TO MAKE IT SOUND THAT WAY. I DON’T KNOW IF I REMEMBERED IT RIGHT OR NOT. IF YOU DID SAY THAT OR IF THAT’S HOW YOU FEEL, MORE IMPORTANTLY, I WOULD REALLY STRONGLY URGE THAT YOU GIVE EVERY CONSIDERATION TO AGREEING TO THAT PROPOSAL THAT COUNSEL MADE, WHICH SIMPLY SAID “I DID NOT MEAN THAT.” I DIDN’T MEAN TO SUGGEST THAT. I’M NOT SAYING YOU HAVE TO DO THAT. I’M NOT. DON’T HEAR THAT FROM ME. BUT YOU DID HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING FROM ME.
 
MS. KRAMER: NO, I DID NOT HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING. I DIDN’T HEAR AN APOLOGY THAT THE COURT’S FRAMED ME FOR LIBEL SEVEN YEARS AGO. I’M SITTING HERE IN HANDCUFFS FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT A FRAUD AND POLICY. IF YOU WANT TO SEND ME BACK TO JAIL, FINE, BUT I’M NOT SIGNING AN APOLOGY FOR THE COURT DOING THAT.
 
THE COURT: OKAY. THAT’S NOT A CONDITION OF ANYTHING.
 
MS. KRAMER: NO, IT ISN’T.
 
THE COURT: IT WAS AN EXPRESSION OF MY WISH, THAT’S ALL I WAS INTENDING —
 
MS. KRAMER: NO. WHAT YOU’RE ASKING ME TO DO IS COLLUDE WITH THE FRAUD — WITH THE COURT TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC AFTER SEVEN YEARS.
THE COURT: RIGHT. BUT I’M NOT CONDITIONING MY DECISION THIS MORNING ON THAT. THAT’S NOT A CONDITION. IT WAS MERELY A WISH.
 
MS. KRAMER: THIS IS A CRIME. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF THAT I’M SITTING HERE LIKE THIS THIS MORNING.
************
On April 5, 2012, when Judge Nugent ordered the false criminal record I had been given while in jail be removed; he libeled me to conceal he put me in jail for refusing to commit criminal perjury to defraud the public.  He ordered that my false criminal contempt record under PC166 be replaced with a false civil contempt record under CCP1218(a).  He hand signed the fraudulent Minute Order and had it hand curriered to the Sheriff Department.
************
That is criminal under Government Codes for an officer of the court to falsify public records.  It is punishable by up to four years in prison, not including the aspect that it was done to conceal prior criminal misconduct of jailing a person for refusing to be coerced to commit perjury to defraud. I blogged about it and the fact that while I was in jail for refusing to commit perjury, Kelman was testifying as an expert defense toxic tort witness for the Social Security Dept in Orange County CA.
*********
What Scheuer and Nugent did next with no fear of anyone stopping them, is truly amazing. Scheuer filed a new contempt of court complaint for me putting the direct evidence on the Net of them jailing me for refusing to commit criminal perjury to defraud the public and then falsifying the Sheriff Dept record to conceal it. 
*********
Judge Nugent granted it, fined me $3K for putting the evidence of his conspiring on the Net, awarded Kelman over $8K in costs, ordered I must publish a false confession on the Internet for a sentence I never wrote, “Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ when he testified in an Oregon lawsuit.” or face more jail time. He then permanently enjoined me from ever writing of the matter again and left me in a position that I had to file an appeal to undo this mess.
************
The powers that be (Michael Roddy and Judge Robert Trentacosta) allowed Nugent finish out the dastardly deeds which caused me to have to appeal, then removed him from his courtroom. Skuttle butt is among the local judges is that Nugent was furious when they took his court from him.
**********
I had to file an intent to appeal under duress that goes right back to the same wicked woman who this entire second case is about trying to shut me up of how she and her justice peers framed me for libel to aid scientific fraud to continue in US courts, Presiding Justice of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Justice Judith McConnell.
************
After I filed, I then challenged her jurisdiction because the judgment from the prior case, sole foundation to this case is fraudulent and void as is the Remitittur from the prior case. She ignores the direct evidence that she has no subject matter jurisdiction. Justice Patricia Benke refuses to recall and rescind the fraudulent Remittitur concealing Hardin is an undisclosed party; and vacate the void judgment that McConnell is feigning gives her subject matter jurisdiction – just like Nugent did for two years.
***********
And McConnell is ordering my opening brief is due on March 21, 2013… in a case all about shutting me up that I can prove she is a political prostitute (not fit to be a Homie of my new Homies) who has no jurisdiction to order anything – other than dismissal of this case/vacate all orders, and reversal of her fraudulent 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion.
************
AND…it appears that the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) is intending to let the blame fall all on one old man, Judge Nugent, to conceal their are no less than six justices and eight judges in San Diego county, along with clerks, and the local DA involved in this fiasco –The local ring leader being Commissioner McConnell, who just stepped off the Commission as of February 28, 2013.
*********
imagesCA7GKE44In conclusion, if this true story of just how infected with moral turpitude the California legal system has become; and the Deliberate Indifference, at best, of the CJP does not anger you, then maybe this will. 
*********
Eight years after I first exposed the mass marketing of scientific fraud behind Kelman’s & Hardin’s extrapolations to conclude proof of lack of causation and the courts framed me for libel for it to keep it going; the United States government and their private sector partners are still using it to defeat their responsibility to military families made severely ill from substandard military housing; just like they were when McConnell first framed me for libel.  
**********
These are the families of the men and women who give their all, including their lives, to defend my and your Constitutional rights to speak the truth on behalf of the citizens of this country. Officers of the courts are to protect these rights which inturn protect the families of those who give their lives to protect us. Not abuse their power to retaliate in furtherance of the dishonorable interest of others. At this point in time, I fear greater threat to the Constitution and the American way by domestic terrorists disguised as judges more than I fear any foreign enemy.
********
HOW the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court justices and Keith Scheuer systematically framed me for libel with actual malice while knowing they were aiding Kelman’s and Hardin’s scientific fraud to continue in US courts and public health policy. DISGUSTING!!!!! 

*********
Advertisements

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s