For good cause and for the sake of public health; Sharon Kramer, (“Appellant”) Under Duress, and the laws of California require Presiding Justice Judith McConnell (“PJ”) be disqualified from this case; including ordering appeal dismissal in concealment of PJ’s bias and prior judicial misconduct to defraud the US public.
This felony act is expected because Appellant refuses to file an opening brief by the date PJ’ court ordered under Rule 8.220(a)(1) on March 6, 2013 — which was March 21st. PJ & Justice Patricia (“Benke”) are concealing that their court has no subject matter jurisdiction.
By law, PJ is required to be disqualified from issuing any judicial rulings or administrative assignments in this matter. She has repeatedly refused to prove her court’s subject matter jurisdiction upon Appellant’s repeated challenges, which provide the direct evidence that PJ’s court has none. PJ cannot truthfully claim she is unbiased or has no financial interest in this case in which all orders, judgments, liens and sanctions need to be vacated. It is in PJ’s personal interest not to vacate these and to criminally dismiss the appeal, coram non judice.
Footnote 1: The predicate defamation case to this case was filed in May of 2005, Superior Court Case No. GIN044539 Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer. In November 2006, Case No. D047758, PJ, two justices & Respondents’ Counsel collusively framed Appellant for defamation in the anti-SLAPP Opinion. In September 2010 Case No. D054496, Benke & two more justices concealed it upon alleged review and concealed the 2008 case judgment is falsified, ante-dated & void to be used for any purpose. This 2nd harassing case is founded on that Void Judgment. In March 2012 Appellant was jailed for refusal of coercion into a false confession. In April 2012 the court ordered the Sheriff Department record falsified to cover up why Appellant was jailed & what PJ, Benke, et.al., have done to Appellant to aid Respondents to defraud the public via scientific fraud upon US courts abetted by collusively criminal acts in these matters. Respondents are toxic tort defense witnesses.
Footnote 2: Penal Code 134 states, ”Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.”
Motion, Memorandum of Points & Authorities and Declaration Under Duress of Sharon Noonan Kramer (This is a large pdf file with working links. It will take several seconds to open) Proof Of Service To California Judicial Council & Commission On Judicial Performance.
Highlight: Transcript of March 14, 2012 North San Diego Superior Court, Judge Thomas P. Nugent Presiding.
The Court: WE ALL KNOW I CALLED THIS MEETING FOR US BECAUSE OF THE DECISION THAT I MADE, AS I REFLECTED ON ALL OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THIS CASE, THAT YOU SHOULD BE RELEASED AT THIS TIME, AND THAT WILL BE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT. I INVITED COUNSEL TO BE HERE OUT OF COURTESY. THIS IS ULTIMATELY MY CALL AND THAT IS MY CALL. [as if it might be somebody else’s?] AND, HOPEFULLY, YOU’LL BE RELEASED FORTHWITH. I KNOW YOU’LL BE TAKEN BACK TO WHERE YOU JUST CAME FROM, AND I UNDERSTAND THE ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE THAT YOU’LL BE RELEASED AT THAT TIME. [This judge had Appellant’s clothes sent to the Vista courthouse the day before with statements made in January 2012 that he wanted to get Appellant to the “psychiatric unit downtown” under Penal Code 1368. But first she needed a criminal record – for alleged civil contempt.] IT SEEMED TO ME IN OUR LAST MEETING I RECALLED YOU EVEN SAID THAT IT WASN’T YOU WHO HAD ACCUSED THE GENTLEMAN OF PERJURY OR OF ALTERING HIS TESTIMONY, IT WAS RATHER COUNSEL’S EFFORTS TO TRY TO MAKE IT SOUND THAT WAY. I DON’T KNOW IF I REMEMBERED IT RIGHT OR NOT. IF YOU DID SAY THAT OR IF THAT’S HOW YOU FEEL, MORE IMPORTANTLY, I WOULD REALLY STRONGLY URGE THAT YOU GIVE EVERY CONSIDERATION TO AGREEING TO THAT PROPOSAL THAT COUNSEL MADE, WHICH SIMPLY SAID “I DID NOT MEAN THAT.” I DIDN’T MEAN TO SUGGEST THAT. I’M NOT SAYING YOU HAVE TO DO THAT. I’M NOT. DON’T HEAR THAT FROM ME. BUT YOU DID HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING FROM ME.
Ms. Kramer: NO, I DID NOT HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING. I DIDN’T HEAR AN APOLOGY THAT THE COURT’S FRAMED ME FOR LIBEL SEVEN YEARS AGO. I’M SITTING HERE IN HANDCUFFS FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT A FRAUD AND POLICY. IF YOU WANT TO SEND ME BACK TO JAIL, FINE, BUT I’M NOT SIGNING AN APOLOGY FOR THE COURT DOING THAT.
The Court: OKAY. THAT’S NOT A CONDITION OF ANYTHING.
Ms. Kramer: NO, IT ISN’T.
The Court: IT WAS AN EXPRESSION OF MY WISH, THAT’S ALL I WAS INTENDING
Ms. Kramer: NO. WHAT YOU’RE ASKING ME TO DO IS COLLUDE WITH THE FRAUD — WITH THE COURT TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC AFTER SEVEN YEARS.
The Court: RIGHT. BUT I’M NOT CONDITIONING MY DECISION THIS MORNING ON THAT. THAT’S NOT A CONDITION. IT WAS MERELY A WISH.
Ms. Kramer: THIS IS A CRIME. YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF THAT I’M SITTING HERE LIKE THIS THIS MORNING.
April 5, 2012: Minute Order in which the Court libeled Appellant to falsely make it appear she was lawfully jailed for violating the January 19, 2012 Civil Contempt Order under C.C.P1218(a). This, to cover up that she was really jailed for refusing to be coerced into criminal perjury by signing the false confession, “Retraction of Sharon Kramer” – to conceal that six Appellate Justices: Judith McConnell, Cynthia Aaron, Alex McDonald, Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman and Joanne Irrion, framed a United States citizen, Appellant, for libel and concealed that Kelman committed perjury to establish malice, while concealing parties to the litigation and falsified court documents. The April 5, 2012 Minute Order was written when the Court was ordering Appellant’s false criminal record she was given under Penal Code 166 while jailed, to be removed and be replaced with an equally libelously false civil contempt record under C.C.P.1218(a) — to conceal the criminal conspiracy to defraud and relentless tormenting of Appellant by PJ, Benke, Respondents, Counsel, et.al.
February 10, 2012: Appellant Notice To Court proving that the Court knew that Appellate could not comply with the unlawful January 19, 2012 Civil Contempt of Court Order, even if she wanted to. Website owners refused to remove the truth from their websites of PJ, Benke, et.al., colluding to defraud the public . The Court did not incarcerate Appellant for violating this unlawful order with which the Court knew she could not comply under C.C.P.1219(a). Appellant Notice To Court (Pg 0,8) & Declarations of Kevin Carstens (Pg 0,1, 4) & Crystal Stuckey Pg (0,4)
March 9, 2012: Minute Order proving Appellant was incarcerated for refusing to sign the false confession and the statement that she does not believe Kelman committed pejury, “Retraction of Sharon Kramer”. “Mrs. Kramer indicates she will not sign proposed retraction.”
In lawful accordance with Code of Civil Procedure 1208(a), this matter may also be read at our sister blog, “Just Answer The Damn Question!” It is under the blog title of: “In YOUR 2006 Opinion, did YOU state that Dr. Kelman admitted payment from the Manhattan Institute after being confronted with his Kilian testimony’? – OR- Are YOU conspiring to silence me because YOU framed me for defamation for writing ‘Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.’? Just Answer The Damn Question, Justice Judith McConnell!”
See answer to “Damn Question!” there.
Read HOW the justices acknowledged the writing is correct with one stroke of the pen; then made it falsely appear to have made a malicious allegation it did not make with the next — aka, framed a US citizen to aid and abet scientific fraud to continue.