May 23, 2013

Fourth District Division One Appellate Court Clerk Kevin J. Lane & Scott Busskohl, Deputy Clerk Fourth District Division One Appellate Court Fax (619) 645-2495

Administrator of the Courts Director Steven Jahr Fax (415) 865-4244

California Supreme Court Clerk Frank McGuire Fax (415) 865-7183 

San DiegoSuperior Clerk of the Court Michael Roddy (Mailed)

Counsel for the Commission on Judicial Performance, Karen Clay, fax (415) 557-1266

Chair of the Judicial Council, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sayauke (Mailed)


Kelman v. Kramer Appellate Case No. D062764  Supreme Court Case No. S210102

In lawful accordance with C.C.P. 1209(b) this document and the referenced linked evidence may be read online at ContemptOfCourtFor.ME under the blog title “APPELLATE COURT CLERKS, CEASE AND DESIST FROM ISSUING A FRAUDULENT REMITTITUR AIDING TO CAUSE ME MORE HARASSMENT, TERRORIZING AND BODILY HARM, CORAM NON JUDICE” Short link:

Mr. Busskohl, Mr. Lane, Mr. Jahr, Mr. McGuire, Mr. Roddy, Ms Clay and Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke,

               As per a conversation of May 22, 2013, Mr. Busskohl informs me that he and the Clerk of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Mr. Lane, will be issuing the remititter back to the lower court on May 26, 2013; even though Justice McConnell has refused to prove her court has subject matter jurisdiction to issue any documents other than to recall and reverse of her fraud upon the court, 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion.[1] 

              If the remittitur issues, plaintiff attorney, Keith Scheuer, has stated in writing that he, plaintiffs and the courts will continue to harass me for my refusal of silence of the extrinsic fraud upon the court in this and the predicate case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, aiding the plaintiffs to defraud the United States public of billions of dollars over the mold issue.  (Attached hereto are 1.) the evidence that Veritox are expert witness contractors of the U.S. Department of Justice, $1.3M in federal contracts; 2.) (2.a) the mass marketing of their scientific fraud;  3.) I exposed  how it was mass marketed into policy and courts and who was involved in my 2005 writing – for which the courts framed me for libel with actual malice for the words “altered his under oath statements” and concealed that Bruce Kelman committed perjury to manufacture reason for malice; 4.) the scientific fraud being used by Veritox on behalf of their client, the US DOJ, against military families sickened by moldy military housing.)

Scheuer wrote in a brief of December 2012,

Once her pending appeal is resolved, Plaintiff will apply again for an Order to Show Cause why she should not be held in contempt, yet again.”

                (See files of EMERGENCY “PETITION” FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FILED UNDER DURESS[6] [7], to the California Supreme Court, STATEMENT FOR REASON FOR EMERGENCY[8] pages 3 & 4 and referenced exhibits) I know this to be a threat of more bodily harm and incarceration by criminal co-conspirators, under the color of law; and so do the courts.              

              Yesterday, when politely but directly discussing with Mr. Busskohl that it is criminal for clerks of the courts to issue known fraudulent court documents and that Justice McConnell was putting him a position of committing a crime if he issues a known fraudulent remittitur; Mr. Busskohl stated Justice McConnell would no let anything happen to him.  He is just a clerk who cannot make such decisions as not to sign his name and issue known fraudulent court documents.

               This is false that clerks of the California courts must issue known fraudulent court documents simply because the judiciaries they work for are corrupt. I informed Mr. Busskohl that the Nuremberg defense does not apply under California law when it comes to clerks of the California courts issuing known fraudulent court documents – being fully aware of their aiding fraud, terrorizing, harassment and the defrauding of the public to continue. Mr. Busskohl is well aware that should the remittitur issue by signature of his hand; he and Mr. Lane are placing me in more harms way by criminal acts, perpetrated under the color of law.

               Since 2005, all courts to oversee these matters have suppressed the evidence that plaintiff (and U.S. DOJ contractor) Bruce Kelman committed perjury to manufacture reason for my alleged malice while strategically litigating against public participation; and with the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court justices being those most easily provable to have suborned the perjury, intentionally. (See PETITION pages 23-25)

               I was jailed in March of 2012 by Judge Thomas Nugent for refusing coercion to sign a document crafted by Scheuer containing the sentence, “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury.” All know I wholeheartedly believe Kelman committed perjury with all courts suppressing the evidence of it.  I was jailed for refusing coercion into perjury. (See PETITION pgs 3-5, 26-29)

              Also concealed by the Appellate justices and others, the 2008 judgment[9] from the predicate case, sole foundation to this case, is void on its face.  It was altered by the Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court, Michael Garland. First he changed the void judgment without initialing and dating to record a fraudulent abstract/lien.  Then he backdated at a later date for the lower court to falsely claim loss of jurisdiction. (See PETITION pages 2-6)

              A void judgment cannot be used for any purpose.  The courts have been harassing, jailing and attempting to coerce me into perjury without jurisdiction in this second case since 2010 based on fraudulent documents by clerks of their courts.  Lying by omission, the judiciaries repeatedly ignore the direct evidence that the judgment is void upon my repeated challenges. Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be ‘assumed’, it must be proved to exist.” Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751.211 P2s 389 (Emphasis Added)

             The 2010 Appellate remittitur [10]from the predicate case is fraudulent and awards costs to undisclosed “Respondents”. (See PETITION pages 7-9)

             The fraudulent 2010 remittitur conceals that the Appellate justices, plaintiffs and their attorney have been concealing Bryan Hardin, 2001 retired US assistant surgeon general and deputy director of CDC NIOSH and sixth owner of Veritox; has been an improperly undisclosed party to these litigations all along. (See PETITION page7)

               Should a new fraudulent remittitur issue back to the lower court at the hands of Clerk of the Court Lane and Deputy Clerk Busskohl, it would be known to them that they were issuing a fraudulent court document while knowing their acts are placing  me in jeopardy of more physical harm and causing me great fear and emotional distress, by courts with no subject matter jurisdiction; and while aiding the continuance of the defrauding of the public.

               Courts are constituted by authority, and they cannot [act] beyond the power delegated to them.  If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.  They are not voidable, but simply void, and thiseven prior to reversal.”  Elliott v. Lessee of Piersol, 26 U.S. (1 Pet.) 328, 340; Old Wayne Life Assn. v. McDonough, 204 U.S. 8, 27 S.Ct. 236

              Should this occur, I am going to be forced to sue the following employees of the Administrative Offices of the Courts and Chairwoman of the Judicial Council and California state agencies in federal court for their involvement in the issuance of, and allowance of subordinates’ issuance of, the newest fraudulent remittitur, while conspiring to defraud:

1. Mr. Michael Roddy, who already has unclean hands in concealing his deputy clerk Garland falsified the 2008 judgment, sole foundational document to this case. This is proven by a forensic audit he did of the predicate case in 2011. Mr. Roddy is also proven to be aware that his deputy clerk’s fraudulent document was used to incarcerate me, coram non judice, for refusing coercion into perjury, where I sustained bodily harm and emotional distress.

2. Mr. Kevin McGuire, who never noticed me of the Supreme Court denial of my PETITION — making it yet another void document aiding yet another fraudulent remittitur to issue to harass and terrorize me.[11] California Rule of the Court 8.528(b)(1) states, “The Supreme Court may dismiss review. The Supreme Court clerk must promptly send an order dismissing review to all parties and the Court of Appeal.  (2)When the Court of Appeal receives an order dismissing review, the decision of that court is final and its clerk must promptly issue a remittitur or take other appropriate action. Rule 8.552(e) states, Order Transfer under this rule requires a Supreme Court order signed by at least four justices; an order denying transfer may be signed by the Chief Justice alone.

3 & 4. Mr. Busskohl and Mr. Lane, for issuing a known fraudulent legal document under the seal of the State of California knowing it would put me in harms way. Penal Code 134 states, ”Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony Government Code 6203 states,“(a) Every officer authorized by law to make or give any certificate or other writing is guilty of a misdemeanor if he or she makes and delivers as true any certificate or writing containing statements which he or she knows to be false.(b) Notwithstanding any other limitation of time described in Section 802 of the Penal Code, or any other provision of law, prosecution for a violation of this offense shall becommenced within four years after discovery of the commission of the offense, or within four years after the completion of the offense, whichever is later.

5. Mr Jahr, for allowing his AOC employees to issue a known fraudulent legal document to aid the judges and justices to commit fraud upon the court for the purpose of harassment and conspiring to defraud the public. Penal Code 162 states, “(a) If two or more persons conspire: (1) To commit any crime. (2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime. (3) Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action, or proceeding. (4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal, or to obtain money or property by false pretenses or by false promises with fraudulent intent not to perform those promises. (5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.”

6. Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sayauke for concealment of Judicial Council members’ and Administrative Presiding Justice McConnell’s et al. fraud upon the court in conspiracy to defraud the United States public. (See Penal Code 162 above).

7. The “independent state agency” the Commission on Judicial Performance, for deliberate indifference while aiding and abetting harassment, terrorizing, suborning of perjury and conspiracy to defraud by leading officers of the California judicial branch and others, including the agency’s former Chairwoman, Justice Judith McConnell. 

8. Evidence of State Bar and Regents of University of California involvement in the fiasco, forthcoming.

              Even though I greatly fear more retaliation, including more false imprisonment and more physical harm by those who are to uphold the law and the Constitution; I will not be silenced of this massive fraud upon the court aiding the continuance of defrauding the public while lives continue to be devastated, daily, directly because of criminal acts of judicial officers of the courts, their clerks, plaintiff counsel and plaintiffs in this matter.  Do not issue the fraudulent remittitur back to the lower court or allow it to be issued or I will, unfortunately be forced to name you, personally, in a federal lawsuit. This continued harassment of me by the courts must stop. 

Thank you,

Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer                                                                                

[1] Motion to disqualify Justice McConnell

[2] Exh 1. $1.3M in Veritox Federal Contracts with US DOJ et al.

[3] Exh 2. Veritox’s calculations as mass marketed by ACOEM   and US Chamber  as fraudulent proof of lack of causation of illness  from toxic mold

[4] Exh 3. March 9, 2005 Exposing how Veritox got the science fraud marketed into policy and who all was involved.

[5] Exh 4. Kelman for US DOJ against mold sick military families 2006 

[6] Body of Petition with working links

[7] Exhibits to Petition with working links

[8] Stated Reason for Emergency

[9]  2008 Void Judgment

[10] 2010 Falsified  Remittitur

[11] May 15, 2013 Letter from Mr. Busskohl stating he is aware I received no notice from Supreme Court w/refusal to record such in the Appellate Court Register of Action . 



  1. I just have to thank you again for your tireless work and putting your life on the line! I recently got yet another unfavorable judgement in my disability case stating once again that the first decision was correct and the court stands by their decision; that I’m not ‘severe enough and can move about’ although they do admit I am sick….. it just boggles my mind the conflict of interest because basically the courts decisions are simply being revisted and ‘investigated’ within the court system instead of using an outside independent judge and doctor, they are keeping the appeals ‘in house’! This I believe is now my fourth unfavorable decision so now on to yet another appeal, this nightmare will never end until the corruption and conflict of interest within the court system ends!

    • I am so sorry this is happening to you and to thousands of others. ONE JUDGE acknowledging the direct evidence that US DOJ contractor, Bruce Kelman, committed perjury to manufacture a reason for my alledged malice; his attorney, Keith Scheuer, repeatedly suborned it; and all courts suppressed the evidence; and the scientific fraud I exposed in 2005 (for which the courts framed me for libel with actual malice), will immediately cease to be used against those sickened by biotoxins in WDB. It will immediately disappear from policy and courts.

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s