This post is in lawful accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure. If anyone can prove any of the following statements are incorrect, send me the evidence at MDResearch@aol.com and I will correct it.
I have one error to correct. The Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) did not lose a 2009 complaint. Only the State Bar claimed to as they simultaneously professed to examine the lost file in December of 2011 for attorney criminal misconduct with the reviewer, Wonder Li-ang, retiring the very next day after the one day review. The CJP just refused to take action on 2010 and 2011 complaints for the courts conspiring with the attorney to defraud.
If you don’t understand something, please ask. There are thousands of lives that hang in the balance of what the Commissioners of the California Commission on Judicial Performance do to discipline their former Chairwoman, Justice Judith McConnell, and co-judicial conspirators, etal. for defrauding the United States public of billions of dollars by criminal means and coram non judice. (That means without subject matter jurisdiction and thus no judicial immunity for conspiring to defraud)
If you are not getting it by now, the reason I put everything on the Net is because it is my only hope to stop the relentless harassment, retaliation and terrorizing of me; and to remove the underlying scientific fraud from U.S. public health policy and U.S. courts over the mold issue that these cases have been all about aiding to continue. That fraud is that two PhDs, Bruce Kelman and Bryan Hardin could apply math extrapolations to data take from a single rodent study and prove mold toxins in a water damaged building could never reach a level to harm any person.
This continues directly because of the California courts framing me for libel with actual malice over the first public writing of how the scientific fraud came to be policy. The harassment of me to conceal what the courts have done continues, while many (almost all) remain silent of what they know and the continued adverse impact on the public because of it.
“She [Defendant Kramer] apparently felt that the remediation work had been inadequately done, and that she and her daughter had suffered life-threatening diseases as a result. I testified that the type and amount of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life-threatening illnesses that she claimed.”
2. His attorney, Keith Scheuer’s, suborning of the perjury three times (2005, 2006 anti-SLAPP brief. In the 2008 MSJ Opposition Motion, he just slying referred to Kelman’s perjured declaration) “Dr. Kelman testified in a deposition that the type and amount of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life threatening illnesses that Kramer claimed. Apparently furious that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled house, Kramer launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputation of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”
When in deposition in DECEMBER 2007 and JULY of 2008 in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Kelman was unable to remember what his testimony was in Mercury, the sole reason given for personal malice in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer. These dates, Dec 2007 and July 2008, are before AND after his MARCH 2008 declaration submission stating under oath that he did remember exactly what he had said in Mercury– as he lied in the declarations to manufacture a reason for malice for yet a third time. July 22, 2008 Deposition of Bruce J. Kelman, couldn’t remember his involvement in Mercury after using perjury to defeat the March 2008 MSJ and the 2006 anti-SLAPP on the issue of malice. (And that, folks! is proof of known perjury in Kelman’s declarations submitted under oath to manufacture a reason for malice while litigating over a writing, mine in 2005, of how his scientific fraud over the mold issue was mass marketed into policy for the purpose of misleading U.S. courts.)
3. October 2008, Declaration of John Richards, Esq. my attorney in Mercury who took Kelman’s deposition in October of 2003. No such testimony was ever given by Kelman in the Mercury case. We received sizable settlements totally approximately $500K and I never “launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputations” of anyone involved in the matter. There was ZERO evidence ever presented in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer that I had even said a harsh personal word of Kelman before I wrote of the mass marketing of scientific fraud in 2005.
4. September 2008 Declaration of William J. Brown III, my first attorney in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer and my attorney in Mercury. The Appellate Court has known since June of 2006 that Kelman was committing perjury and Scheuer was suborning it to manufacture a reason for malice in eight years worth of SLAPP over a matter impacting public health. The trial courts have known since Sept of 2005 via my declaration. Actually, longer. The first judge in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer was the same judge in Mercury, Judge Michael Orfield, who signed three of the settlement agreements worth about $450K in Mercury. We just wanted our house fixed so we could safely go home after a botched remediation. Our insurer sued us for not accepting $30K. We counter sued them, the remediator and the lab. Orfield retired two weeks before the August 2008 trial in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer shortly after denying the 2008 MSJ Motion where Kelman’s perjury to establish malice was again used and the evidence that it was perjury was ignored by him.
5. August 18, 2008 Court Transcript when framing the scope of the trial (as taken from my 2009 Appellate Brief and ignored). The perjury to manufacture a reason for personal malice in the anti-SLAPP/MSJ was then used to frame the scope of the trial so the science fraud in policy could not be discussed in front of the jury. Without being able to understand the underlying fraud, the jury couldn’t understand the reason behind why Kelman “altered his under oath statements” when testifying as an expert defense witness in a trial in Oregon to try to shut down a line of questioning and was obfuscating when discussing how it became a scientific fraud in U.S public health policy that it is proven biotoxins in moldy buildings do not harm…for the purpose of misleading U.S.courts.
6. October 2008 Declaration of Dr. Harriet Ammann, toxicologist and co-author of the National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health”. Because of the perjury to manufacture a reason for malice framing the scope of the trial, she could not testify in trial, including that Kelman could not have given the testimony he claimed he did in Mercury, as a toxicologist with a PhD. She flew from Washington state and sat in a Vista, Ca hotel room for two days hoping to be able to testify. (Besides never claiming to have “acquired life threatening disease”, we made no claims of illness from toxicity in Mercury – the only thing that Kelman can profess expertise to testify to the probability of. We just wanted our cross-contaminated house fixed after a botched remediation so we could safely go home again. What Kelman actually testified to in Mercury was that a physician with knowledge of the child –my daughter with Cystic Fibrosis and Allegic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis — would have to be consulted regarding the safety of the home. Bruce J. Kelman July 2002 letter to Mercury’s attorneys, Hiles and Stone. Bruce J. Kelman entire deposition, October 2003, in Mercury.
7. October 2008 Declaration of mold advocate, Mary Mulvey Jacobson. She flew from Boston to San Diego in August of 2008 to testify in Kelman & Globaltox v. Kramer, but there was no point in her testifying in trial since the mass marketing of science fraud could not be discussed in front of the jury.
8. October 2008 Declaration of my trial attorney, Lincoln Bandlow, Esq., regarding that “over his strenuous objects” the science could not be discussed in trial and that he found out after trial that false hearsay documents got into the jury room that were not discussed in trial, causing a verdict for Kelman (I prevailed over Veritox/GlobalTox).
9. October 2008 Declaration of Juror #5, Shelby Stuntz, Esq, regarding emails calling me a “cyberstalker” (for something I never said) and not discussed in trial, that were read aloud in the jury room causing a verdict for Kelman.
10. December 2008 Declaration of Jury Foreman, Reverend Roy Litzenberg, stating the jury was told by the trial judge that “yes” they had to follow the “Plaintiffs’ Special Jury Instructions Definition of Actual Malice” and instructions one – six to make the finding of libel with actual malice. The instructions were phrased to make it appear it had been predetermined that I failed to investigate and had personal malice for Kelman when I wrote in 2005. (I didn’t then, but I sure do now for his lying under oath to try to destroy me and shut me up of his involvement in defrauding the U.S. public!) In December 2008, the trial judge, Lisa Schall, refused to even hear oral argument for a new trial. In September of 2008, she was publicly admonished by the CJP – then chaired by McConnell. McConnell was the first appellate justice to conceal Kelman’s perjury to manufacture reason for malice in the 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion and the last in 2013 when refusing to be disqualified from the case.
11. Fourteen key lines are missing from the middle of the transcript of Kelman’s Oregon testimony that I was writing of in March of 2005, in the 2006 anti-SLAPP and 2010 “review” Appellate Opinions. This was to make it appear that I failed to investigate and published with reckless disregard for the truth (actual malice). By deleting these 14 key lines, they changed the color of his testimony to make it appear he willingly clarified about the think-tank money, rather than was trying to shut down the line of questioning and then flip-flopping back and forth about the connection of the U.S. medical policy writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM), to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Manhattan Institute think-tank when influencing policy and courts over the mold issue with garbage science.
11. June 2, 2013, Another fax to the Commission on Judicial Performance regarding more information that they don’t want of the California courts being in deep trouble for conspiring to defraud – and them too, if they pretend they don’t know that these conspiring judiciaries need to be thrown off the bench and put behind bars for the thousands of lives they have KNOWINGLY devastated – corum non judice.
And that! folks! is just the Tip of the Iceberg of what I know of the mechanics of HOW the U.S. government, State of California, several medical universities, profitable non-profits, think-tanks and private sector industries have worked in concert to defraud the public over the mold issue – with the CA courts caught red handed aiding it to continue by criminal means.
….and, unfortunately, with many “good men” remaining silent and many caddy, competitive, back stabbing, ignorant, ninnies — aka “self professed advocates for the mold sick” gossiping that I am lying about holding the key to shutting down the fraud while making it harder for me to get the truth out. (I could add several jaw droppingly stupid, mean spirited and self serving links here. But I will refrain out of love and respect for the dead and those they loved and tried to help inspite of themselves.)
This, as the fraud continues to play on in policy and courts to harm the lives of thousands, i.e. that it is scientifically proven by Kelman & Hardin that mold toxins in water damaged buildings could never reach a level to harm and any individual; and I continue to experience a wrath of retaliation for refusing silence — including but not limited to false imprisonment and financial ruination for refusing to be coerced to say this is not happening in the courts of California to aid the scientific fraud to continue in U.S. policy and U.S. courts over the mold issue.
So…..PLEASE raise your hand if you understand perjury, suborning of perjury and concealment of perjury is criminal. PLEASE raise your hand if you understand it is criminal to incarcerate a defendant for refusing to say, in writing and under penalty of perjury, that they don’t believe the plaintiff committed perjury – for the purpose of trying to coerce, intimidate and terrorize the defendant to participate in defrauding the United States public.
PLEASE raise your hand…. because I have little to no faith that the Commissioners of California Commission on Judicial Performance will do a darn thing to stop this relentless harassment, terrorizing and character assasination of me; and the resultant continued defrauding of the U.S. public over the mold issue because of it.