Ms. Crystal Stuckey

Riverstone Residential, the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, and the owners of Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana allow tenants to be exposed to extreme amounts of toxins from molds by intentionally concealing evidence. To this day, I stll receive complaints of residents in the complex on my blog, Katy’s Exposure.

Documented mold inspection reports in 2007 confirming mold in many of these apartments were apparently not considered very important by the sellers, purchasers, Riverstone Residential, the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, and the State of Louisiana when all were involved in a transaction concerning this complex.

My daughter, her one-year-old baby, and I were allowed to lease an apartment in 2005, which was known to have a very serious mold infestation, but they had covered up the problem with paint and cleaning the ducts. As I understand it, many apartments in the complex were filled with extreme amounts of molds.

The owners, Riverstone Residential, the LHFA, and The State of Louisiana, all know of this severe mold infestation. There are several documents including our report in 2005, the report for the sale in 2007, visual mold growth, odors from the volatile organic compounds being emitted and many other complaints. .

Our rights, which include not being intentionally exposed to toxins by an unethical and unconscionable company, have been violated again by obvious manipulation and corruption within the justice system.

All of the parties listed above have shown a conscious disregard for our family’s health, the health of other tenants, and state and federal laws. How dare they be allowed to do this to us and others and then have the courts look the other way.

By leasing an apartment they knew had extreme amounts of toxins from molds and intentionally concealing evidence of this, the owners and the management company of this complex made a choice to expose us to toxins and put our lives at risk. They now need to be held accountable for that choice. The fact that they and others can get out of being held accountable through obvious manipulation and corruption in our case and throughout the legal system does not mean they should not be held accountable. It means they are guilty of obvious manipulation and corruption in our case.

This should never have happened to us or to others and should not be allowed to continue. I will not just walk away from the harm this has caused us.

You might think this is an isolated incidence. It’s not. This same scenario is playing out throughout the country. Many families have been put at risk through slumlords, inhabitable apartments, improper remediation, shoddy construction, bad faith behavior by insurance companies, and corruption and all out coverup within the legal system.

In 2007, I started Katy’s Exposure Blog to help get the word out of the true potential for illnesses caused by water damaged buildings, so no other family across the US would have to experience what our family did.   I am proud to say that my blog has been cited as reference for a Federal OSHA Indoor Air Quality advisory.

I am sad to say, that I have been hacked, invaded, threatened with litigation for exposing the truth and personally stalked; even being told by a stranger, “Ma’am, you are being watched”.   I have been able to determine my phone calls are sometimes rerouted.  If one read all the evidence of corruption over the mold issue, other environmental exposures and corruption in our legal system that is posted on Katy’s, one would understand why there are many who would like to see me silenced.

Regardless, I have no intention of being silenced when so many lives continued to be devastated by the interest of the monied being given precedence over the lives of the citizens of the United States. Not only do I find it deplorable that people are knowingly being left unaware of the potential dangers of poor indoor air quality in moldy buildings and other environmental exposures; I am completely disgusted to experience and witness what happens to US citizens who dare to speak the truth for their fellow man. Since when did speaking the truth in the USA  make one an enemy of the courts, like Mrs. Kramer is experiencing?

Since when do judges have a right to demand that overwhelming evidence of them colluding to defraud the public must be taken off the Internet or they will incarcerate an honest US citizen?


Alert Homeland SecurityI have the direct evidence posted on my blog, Katy’s Exposure, that the San Diego Appellate Court framed Mrs. Kramer for libel while they suppressed the evidence Mr. Kelman committed perjury to establish reason for malice.  Then they gagged Mrs. Kramer from being able to write of it by gagging her from writing the words for which she was framed, “altered his under oath statements”. What they want off the Internet is that we showed they – meaning CA judicial branch leaders – KNOW It.   If I am a liar, it would be very easy for Mr. Kelman, Mr. Scheuer and the California courts to prove it.  All they would have to do is produce two pieces of evidence:
1. that Mrs. Kramer was ever impeached as to the belief of the words “altered his under oath statements” as an accurate description of Mr. Kelman’s testimony in a trial in Oregon, February 2005; and
2. the evidence that would corroborate that Mr. Kelman did not commit pejury to establish a needed theme for malice in the libel litigation.
In seven years time, they cannot produce this. The evidence does not exist!
The courts framed a whistle blower of fraud in environmental policy as they suppressed the evidence the author of the fraud committed criminal perjury, aiding the fraud to continue. Now they want that off my blog or Mrs. Kramer is going to jail!

Below are the three posts they want taken off my blog, Katy’s Exposure, or Ms. Kramer is going to jail.   She doesn’t control my blog and the evidence of the courts colluding to defraud the public is not coming down off my blog. Be sure to read the linked letters to California Judicial leaders of September 11, 2011, of what evidence they REALLY want to remain hidden from public view.

Is the California Case Management System CCMS being misused for politics in policy, litigation…and the fleecing of the California taxpayer over the Mold Issue?  


What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s