…. in furtherance of conspiracy to defraud the United States public over the mold issue with USDOJ contractors, Bruce Kelman, Veritox, Inc, & their CA licensed attorney, Keith Scheuer.
June 27, 2013
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
2031 Arborwood Place
Escondido, CA 92029
In the matter of United States Department of Justice toxic tort expert witnesses, Bruce Kelman & Veritox, Inc. vs. Environmental Advocate Sharon Kramer & the United States Constitution in eight years of California Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (“SLAPP”) by criminal means.
THIS COMPLAINT is filed with the CA Commissioners on Judicial Performance; the Chairwoman of the CA Judicial Council Tani Cantil-Sayauke; the Director of the CA Administrative Offices of the Courts Stephen Jahr; the twenty-three U.S. Senators of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension Committee (“HELP”); U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) & U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA).
This COMPLAINT and linked direct evidence may be read online by July 1, 2013 at: ContemptOfCourtFor.ME under the blog title: “Complaint to Comm on Judicial Performance ~ June 12, 2013, Judge Thomas Nugent & AOC employee use USPS to mail known fraudulent NOTICE from non-existent ‘The Court’ in violation of Penal Code 134”…. in furtherance of court employees conspiring to defraud the United States public over the mold issue with US DOJ contractors, Bruce Kelman, Veritox, Inc, & their CA licensed attorney, Keith Scheuer. Short link: http://wp.me/p20mAH-qe
Re: EIGHT YEARS harassment for telling the truth in America is ENOUGH! I’ve been harassed, terrorized, retaliated against, financial ruined, jailed, caused bodily harm, character assassinated, given a false FBI record and had fraudulent liens placed on my property for my exposing how government and industry have colluded to defraud the public over the mold issue via the use of mass marketed scientific fraud in policy and courts. (See Exhibit 2, pages 4-7, 10-13). Officers of the California courts have been caught red handed aiding it to continue by criminal means. (See Exhibit 1, a fraudulent court NOTICE from a court case that does not exist by a judge without court subject matter jurisdiction. See Exhibit 2 in its entirety)
When those involved stop trying to suppress and ignore the direct evidence that U.S. Department of Justice contractor/expert defense witness in mold litigation, Bruce J. Kelman, committed material criminal perjury in three declarations submitted under penalty of perjury as a plaintiff in California SLAPP to manufacture a reason for my, the defendant’s, alleged malice (See Exhibit 2 pages 15-18); then thousands of lives will immediately be better protected from illness caused by toxins and biocontaminamts in water damaged buildings. Mr. Kelman and his scientific fraud that he proved these illnesses “Could not be” for the US Chamber, etal, will be rightfully discredited and removed from courts and policies all across the United States.
Specifically, the politically motivated scientific fraud that is being shielded to continue by fraud upon the court and concealment of plaintiff perjury in eight years of malicious SLAPP; and attempted concealment of numerous frauds upon the court to try to silence, intimidate and discredit me, is:
It is accurate science to state that we do not know everything of what is causing thousands to experience chronic, systemic, debilitating, inflammatory illnesses upon exposure to biocontaminants and microbial toxins in water damaged buildings, but…..
…….only a idiot could believe that two well connected toxicologist PhDs, Bruce Kelman & Bryan Hardin of Veritox armed solely with a calculator and think-tank money, could apply extrapolations to data taken from a single rodent study and scientifically prove, “Thus the notion that toxic mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim is junk science unsupported by actual scientific study” for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 2003 “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”. A.k.a. “Manhattan Institute commissioned piece”. A.k.a. mass marketing of scientific fraud. A.k.a. subject paper of my 2005 writing for which the CA courts frame me for libel with actual malice over the words, ‘altered his under oath statements”, while knowing they were aiding the scientific fraud to continue via the whims of politicians. (See Exhibit 2 pages 10-18 for the State of California, U.S. Senate HELP, and a U.S. Congressman from California taking direct measures for the scientific fraud to commence and continue in U.S. public health policies and U.S. courts).
THIS COMPLAINT is against JUDGE THOMAS P. (“NUGENT”) & AOC Employee, Deputy Clerk of the Court, JAY W. (“BROWDER”) San Diego Superior Court, Department 60.
1. The complaint is for acts to defraud while feigning court subject matter jurisdiction; mailing fraudulent documents via the USPS under the color of law; obfuscating and retaliating under the color of law for getting caught conspiring to defraud over a matter impacting public health, coram non judice. The complaint is for the latest act of dishonesty, criminality and moral turpitude adverse to public health and safety by NUGENT et al. (See Exhibit 2, pages 1-7)
2. Pursuant to article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution, the Commission on Judicial Performance (“CJP”) is mandated to discipline a judge for ordering the mailing of a fraudulent (“NOTICE”) TO FILING PARTY from a non-existent “The Court” on June 12, 2013. The CJP’s mandate is to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judicial system. Commission proceedings are to provide a fair and appropriate mechanism to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. The commission’s jurisdiction includes all judges of California’s superior courts and the justices of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. The commission also has jurisdiction over former judges for conduct prior to retirement or resignation.
3. The Commissioners are mandated to reprimand NUGENT for the June 12, 2013 act of feigning his acts are the acts of “The Court” and ordering the mailing of a fraudulent NOTICE from “The Court”. As the CJP is well aware, NUGENT never presided over any court in the matter of Bruce J. Kelman & GlobaTox, Inc. v Sharon Kramer, Case No GIN044539. The NOTICE did not come from any “The Court” with subject matter jurisdiction to mail the fraudulent NOTICE.
4. In my June 7th letter, of which the CJP received a copy, NUGENT and others were asked to personally provide evidence that he had not presided over the case of Kelman v. Kramer 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC while concealing that the foundational document to the case was a void judgment from a prior case, Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No. GIN044530. (See Exhibit 1 for my June 7th letter requesting, Thomas Nugent, eighteen CA judiciaries, three AOC employees and a CA licensed attorney prove, by June 20, 2013, that they have not been suborning perjury and conspiring to defraud, coram non judice.)
5. With truly amazing audacity, instead of providing evidence that his court had subject matter jurisdiction when he jailed me for refusing to be coerced into perjury to defraud the public and sign a document containing the sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury”; NUGENT again ordered an AOC employee to mail a NOTICE from “The Court” that has no subject matter jurisdiction over the case stated in the NOTICE. This, while proving my point that NUGENT has no qualms to commit frauds upon the court under the color of law and without any court having subject matter jurisdiction. (See Exhibit 1 for NOTICE from non-existent “The Court”)
6. Under false pretense of Department 60 being “The Court” in a legal matter, AOC employee/deputy clerk BROWDER, stopped the delivery of U.S. mail to Superior Court employee NUGENT at the judge’s directive that this shielding act be done under the false premise of being done by “The Court”.
7. On June 12, 2013, Judge NUGENT and AOC employee BROWDER colluded to use the USPS to mail the NOTICE to me from the non-existent “The Court” feigning court jurisdiction to return my June 7th letter that I mailed to NUGENT, personally. (See Exhibit 1 for their fraudulent NOTICE under the guise that it came from “The Court”. See Exhibit 2 pages 1-6 for detailed description the false statements in the NOTICE — which is all of them.)
8. Their NOTICE is the latest in a series frauds upon the court concealing criminal perjury by U.S. Department of Justice contractors in SLAPP; falsification of several court documents including judgments and remittiturs; and continued usage of the void court documents by court employees, while feigning ignorance that they have been defrauding the public with no judicial immunity. (See Exhibit 2 pages 13-18 “Environmental Advocate Sharon Kramer ~ U.S. Dept of Justice Lying Experts ~ Cal Courts & Mold ~ Not a pretty story!!” http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/environmental-advocate-sharon-kramer-us-doj-expertscal-courts-mold-not-a-pretty-story/)
9. Under California Penal Code 134 it is a felony act for an officer of the court to direct an employee of the AOC to mail a known fraudulent NOTICE under the color of law and false pretense that the NOTICE was issued by “The Court”. P.C. 134 states, “Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.”
10. Under California Government Code 6203, it is a misdemeanor punishable by up to four years in prison for an officer of the court, with no court subject matter jurisdiction, to direct an AOC employee to mail a known fraudulent and obfuscating NOTICE; and for the AOC employee to mail it under the guise that the NOTICE came from “The Court” G.C.6203 states, “(a) Every officer authorized by law to make or give any certificate or other writing is guilty of a misdemeanor if he or she makes and delivers as true any certificate or writing containing statements which he or she knows to be false.(b) Notwithstanding any other limitation of time described in Section 802 of the Penal Code, or any other provision of law, prosecution for a violation of this offense shall be commenced within four years after discovery of the commission of the offense, or within four years after the completion of the offense, whichever is later.
11. Penal Code 162 describes the above directly evidenced acts as criminal conspiracy “(a) If two or more persons conspire: (1) To commit any crime. (4) To cheat and defraud any person of any property, by any means which are in themselves criminal..,. (5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.”
12. Everyday that this is allowed to continue with NO ONE from CA to DC acting to stop the science fraud and punish compromised officers of the California courts/AOC employees/U.S. DOJ contractors for conspiring to defraud by criminal means in SLAPP; is another day that some U.S. citizen’s life is being devastated by the false concept that their illnesses are scientifically proven by Mr. Kelman and Mr. Hardin of Veritox, Inc.,“Could not be” caused by biocontaminants in water damaged buildings.
13. Disclosure: I have an error in my prior communication with legal counsel for the CJP, Karen Clay, Esq. It appears the CJP did not lose a complaint from 2009. My first complaint to them regarding this conspiracy to defraud/concealment of plaintiff perjury in SLAPP involving their then chairwoman, Justice Judith McConnell, was submitted in 2010, to which they replied they could do nothing. Only the State Bar claimed to have lost my complaint to them from 2009 – while simultaneously claiming they somehow magically reviewed the complaint file in 2011 and there is nothing to it. (The reviewer, Wonder Li-ang, retired the next day after sending me the “review” letter upon his one day “review”).
14. Forthcoming is yet another complaint to State Bar against California licensed attorney, Keith Scheuer, for suborning plaintiff perjury and submitting/benefiting from known fraudulent court documents. This, along with a complaint OF the State Bar’s prior concealment of his suborning of US DOJ contractor/plaintiffs perjury and eighteen judiciaries’ involvement in rewarding the criminal perjury in SLAPP, while relentless retaliating for my refusal of silence and continued adverse impact on the public by their aiding and abetting Veritox’s scientific fraud – by criminal means.
- The eighteen California judiciaries named in concealment of US DOJ contractor perjury in
SLAPP and numerous falsified court documents used to harass, retaliate and defraud the public over the mold issue are stated below. Many acted coram non judice, aided yet again to be concealed by the fraudulent June 12, 2013 NOTICE from Judge NUGENT and Clerk BRODER under the guise that the NOTICE came from “The Court” (The CJP already has the direct evidence of the void 2008 judgment and falsified 2010 remittitur concealing parties to the eight years of SLAPP)
1. California Supreme Court Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke, Chair of the Judicial Council
2. Former California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George
3. Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Judicial Council, Justice Douglas Miller
4. Presiding Justice Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Judith McConnell
5. Appellate Justice Richard Huffman, ex-Chair of Executive Comm of Judicial Council
6. Appellate Justice Patricia Benke
7. Appellate Justice Cynthia Aaron
8. Appellate Justice Alex MacDonald
9. Appellate Justice Joan Irion
10. San Diego Superior Court Presiding Judge Robert Trentacosta
11. Former Superior Court Presiding Judge Kevin Enright
12. Superior Court Judge Michael Orfield (retired)
13. Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall
14. Superior Court Judge Joel Pressman
15. Superior Court Judge William Dato
16. Superior Court Judge Thomas Nugent
17. Superior Court Judge Robert Dahlquist
18. Superior Court Judge Earl Maas III
16. Lack of action is an act of individual and/or collective choice. When that choice is to turn a blind eye to collusion to defraud the public by government contractors and officers of the courts, the term for this choice of lack of action is “Deliberate Indifference”. When Deliberate Indifference is rampant and incestuous the term for that is “Conspiracy to Defraud the Public”.
17. See “Demands of a Whistleblower 2/13”. http://contemptofcourtfor.me/demands-of-a-whistleblower-february-2013/ ) This was hand delivered by me in Washington DC on February 6th and 7th, 2013 and discussed with two legislative assistants of Senator Dianne Feinstein; two legislative assistants of Senator Barbara Boxer; two legislative assistants of Senate HELP; and one legislative assistant of Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA)
18. The twenty-five United States Senator noticed of this COMPLAINT by FAX, one-fourth of the entire U.S. Senate, are Dianne Feinstein (D-CA); Barbara Boxer (D-CA); Tom Harkin (D-IA) Chair of Senate HELP; Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Ranking Member Senate HELP; U.S. Senators who are committee members of Senate HELP:
Barbara A. Mikulski (MD) Patty Murray (WA)
Bernard Sanders (I) (VT) Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA)
Kay R. Hagan (NC) Al Franken (MN)
Michael F. Bennet (CO) Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
Tammy Baldwin (WI) Christopher S. Murphy (CT)
Elizabeth Warren (MA) Lamar Alexander (TN)
Michael B. Enzi (WY) Richard Burr (NC)
Johnny Isakson (GA) Rand Paul (KY)
Orrin G. Hatch (UT) Pat Roberts (KS)
Lisa Murkowski (AK) Mark Kirk (IL)
Tim Scott (SC)
Also notice by fax, U.S. Congressman Darryl Issa (R-CA) NorthSan DiegoCounty
19. I have no intention of being silenced until someone gets off their political arses 1. to SHUT DOWN the scientific fraud that it has been proven mold toxins in water damaged buildings could never reach a level to harm; 2. to punish the judiciaries, clerks and attorneys for their criminal roles in aiding U.S DOJ contracted expert witnesses to defraud the public by criminal means in California SLAPP for now eight years; and 3. to punish the U.S.DOJ contractors for criminal harassment, terrorizing, fraudulent liens, and relentless retaliation of a whistle blowing environmental advocate, me, to try to keep their science fraud and their criminal involvement in SLAPP hidden from public light – while their scientific fraud plays on to harm many.
20. It is YOUR JOBS that are funded with tax dollars on behalf of the citizens of California and the United States to stop frauds in policy and corruption in the courts; and to protect me and the public from the systemic corruption – not mine.
21. Please send written responses to this COMPLAINT from the 1.) Commissioners on Judicial Performance; 2.) the Chairwoman of the CA Judicial Council; 3.) the CA Administrator of the Offices of the Courts; 4 -29.) twenty-five United States Senators; 30.) one U.S. Congressman; 31.) the Governor/UC Regent of California; 32.) the CA Attorney General; 33.) the U.S. Attorney General; and 34.) the President of the United States; explaining your intended plans of actions to stop the defrauding of the United States public over the mold issue by federal contractors et.al.; and your plans of restitution to my husband and me for the relentless, malicious, vexatious, harassing retaliation for my daring to expose government rewarded/shielded scientific fraud over the mold issue aided to continue by criminal acts of officers of the California courts.
Dates COMPLAINT Submitted by Mail and Faxes, June 27, 2013
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
CC: Governor Jerry Brown, Regent of the University of California
California Attorney General, Kamala Harris
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, contracted party with
plaintiffs, Veritox, Inc.
U.S. President Barack Obama
See FAXED NOTICES sent to 25 members of the United States Senate, 1 US Congressman and 1 CA Senator regarding Senate HELP and University of California involvment in the debacle.